The Audi S8 of 2006-2010 may not be the first choice of BMW M5 or Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG fanciers, but don’t underestimate its deeply interesting 5.2-litre V10 or the value of its quattro system when conditions are less than ideal. Audi S8, £10,995: And what a talking point that lump is. It’s closely related to the V10 in the Lamborghini Gallardo and, while it’s less powerful, with 444bhp to the Gallardo’s 552bhp, it’s just as torquey, although at half the revs (3000rpm). Other S8 talking points include the car’s aluminium body (reasonably dent resistant but difficult to repair if it gets a bad knock) and suspension. However, things to keep under wraps are a heroic thirst of around 20mpg, a firm ride and high servicing costs – cylinder 10’s spark plug in particular is expensively difficult to access. Our interest in this Audi flagship was prompted by a 2007/07 S8 with 93,000 miles that we found, advertised for £10,995. It’s finished in black and has been serviced every 10,000 miles, although we’d want to scrutinise every invoice to establish exactly what was done. It’s had two previous keepers, the last one its custodian for the past six years. The car is for sale at a dealer with a 12-month MOT. We’re a risk-averse bunch so we’d check the engine for leaks from the cam covers and oil pump, and that the six-speed Tiptronic ’box performs smoothly. Turning to the suspension and brakes, any noises from the front end would have us running for the hills – it could mean replacement of whole suspension arms is needed. Worn brake discs are super-expensive to replace and we’d want to be sure there are no issues with the electronic parking brake. The size of a Land Cruiser but with two doors plus a couple of miniature suicide ones, and powered by a 4.0 V6 with 239bhp, the FJ is an uncompromising beast with a spacious cabin that’s full of details. This ’02 car has done 114,000 miles. Some say the 309 GTi’s stiffer body gave it the edge over the 205. With the numbers of both falling like a lift, it no longer matters. This 1991 309 has 150,000 miles but, says the seller, it runs sweetly. Seats and door cards have just been restored, too. Not pretty in its day but by Jove this one-owner XM estate, with 26,000 miles and a full history, looks the business now. It’s had its suspension spheres and LHM fluid replaced and has no rust, dents, scratches or tears. The velour seats are fully electric. For sale at a Ford dealer, this old Model T is fresh from a restoration at a motor museum. It’s authentic in every detail but has a few mod cons including a push-button start for those times when turning the crank handle seems like too much effort. Auction watch Never mind that this Bluebird made £4000 at auction, has done just 86,000 miles, is over 30 years old (it was registered in 1988) and has one owner in the logbook; more remarkable is that it survived the 2009 scrappage scheme. You’d have thought such an unloved repmobile would have been ripe for the crusher but no, some free spirit had the sense to save it. Its 1.8 turbo engine makes 135bhp and is good for 0-62mph in 8.6sec, and being in Executive spec it has leather, air-con and a radio – in 1988, all sought-after options on more expensive cars. Future classic For a time it looked like the prices of Saab’s big saloon were stabilising, but it was an illusion and now they’re entering the basement. This £3600 SE is a 2010 car with 112,000 miles on the clock and a recent full brake and cambelt service. At the other end of the spectrum, prices peak at around £10,000 for a 2011 TiD with 46,000 miles. However, we’d prefer to put our money in one of the rarer petrols, such as the 2010 2.8 T Aero XWD with 98,000 miles we saw for £7650 (new price £37,795). Clash of the classifieds Brief: Find me the best Q-car for under £5000. 2004 Audi S4 Cabriolet, £4995 2002 Jaguar S-Type V8 R, £4995 Mark Pearson: We’d nearly given up on the dear old S-Type when this humdinger came along, with an Eaton-supercharged 4.2-litre V8 making near enough 400bhp and 0-60mph in 5.3sec. Rock and roll! It’s the perfect Q-car, unlike your, what is it, an Audi A4 convertible? Max Adams: Have you seen the grille on the S-Type? Subtle it is not! Unlike my gloriously understated Audi that also packs a 4.2-litre V8 with 344bhp on tap. MP: Only 344bhp? Why so low? Has it got a fault? I’m surprised it can push that heavyweight drop-top along at all. Mine can carry five fast and in discreet luxury. Wood and leather, old boy… MA: Wood and leather won’t make a car fast; if anything, your luxo-barge will weigh more than my stealthy convertible. MP: So it should, it’s built to impress. Luckily, the S-Type R has got more than enough shove to make life fun – you can hang the tail out and everything. I can’t imagine that Audi’s much fun. MA: Your argument hinges on sliding the tail out? That’s not the fastest way round a corner, so I
Origin: Buy them before we do: second-hand picks for 2 August
Fiat mechanic leaves behind literally tons of vehicles for sale
Have you ever dreamed of owning 75 Fiats? No? Does that literally sound like the definition of a nightmare to you? Well, luckily enough for you, this yard full of 75 Fiats is selling them off one by one. Relieved?Unfortunately, the cars are coming up for sale due to the death of the owner of the shop theyre parked behind.Tom Dotter of Denver, Colorado was a mechanic who specialized in Fiats; he passed away in May due to a heart attack, followed by a stroke.Thats why Dotters surviving family is holding the Great Fiat Yard Sale, which lets you show up, take a look at the collection and potentially walk (or trailer) away with a classic Fiat project.According to the Everything Fiat 124 page, the vehicles are being sold at US$250 apiece. Some have titles, some dont, some of them already have owners that are trying to be reached, like all the Lancia Scorpions drat!Most of the vehicles are 124 Spyders, but there are also a handful of 128s, as well as 131s and Bravas. Some 850 Coupes and Spyders are also peppered among the metal, along with X1/9s. Theres even a couple Yugos and Subaru XTs in there, just to keep things interesting (as if a yard full of Fiats wasnt already).It almost goes without saying, but none of these cars are in perfect shape all will require work, but for somebody whos always wanted an old Fiat, this is the time to buy. The owners would like to see every car go to a new home, whether its being restored, or raced, or even enjoyed
Origin: Fiat mechanic leaves behind literally tons of vehicles for sale
19-year-old charged with stealing $1.26M of new Toyota, Lexus cars in Toronto
Slow U.S. sales spell the end for the Lexus CT200h south of the border. A 19-year-old man is facing dozens of charges in the investigation of $1.26 million worth of stolen vehicles, Toronto Police say.From November 20 to December 22, 2018, police say an organized motor theft operation targeted new, high-end Lexus and Toyota vehicles in the wee hours of the morning.Thirty-six vehicles were stolen.Kevin Ramnaraine, of Montreal, was arrested July 19 and charged with 71 offences including with 35 counts of theft of a motor vehicle, 35 counts of commit an indictable offence for a criminal organization and possession of property obtained by crime.He is to appear in College Park court on Aug.
Origin: 19-year-old charged with stealing $1.26M of new Toyota, Lexus cars in Toronto
Driver allegedly bear-sprayed during B.C. road-rage incident
In this file photo, officers from the Greater Sudbury Police and Ontario Provincial Police conducted spot checks on Municipal Road 80.John Lappa / Postmedia Network Burnaby RCMP is investigating a road-rage incident in which a man says he was attacked with bear repellent.The man told police he was involved in an accident at the intersection of Lougheed Highway and Madison Avenue in Burnaby, B.C. on the evening of July 14. He was stopped at the intersection when his vehicle was struck by an SUV, believed to be a gold Lincoln Navigator.When the man pulled his vehicle to the side of the highway, the SUV pulled up beside him and a man in the passenger seat unloaded a can of bear spray into his car. The man said the driver of the SUV then repeatedly rammed his vehicle before fleeing the scene.The SUV was described as a newer-model Lincoln Navigator, gold or beige in colour, with a distinct black bumper. The two suspects inside were white men in their 20s, wearing dark clothing.The suspect vehicle is quite unique in appearance so were hopeful that someone will have information about this vehicle that will help further our investigation, said Burnaby RCMP spokesman Cpl. Mike
Origin: Driver allegedly bear-sprayed during B.C. road-rage incident
Driver who filmed video on phone cleared by high court
The high court has ruled that using a mobile phone for certain functions while driving is not necessarily illegal. Ramsey Barreto, 51, was convicted at a magistrates court for using his mobile phone while driving to film a crash in north London in 2017. His conviction was subsequently overturned at crown court last October, when a judge ruled the law did not prevent using a phone to film a video while driving. That verdict was referred to the high court and two judges have now upheld it. They ruled that laws banning phone use while driving, introduced in the Road Safety Act 2006, do not apply in all cases, because of how the law defines a ‘hand-held mobile telephone’. The high court ruling judgment read: “The legislation does not prohibit all use of a mobile phone held while driving. It prohibits driving while using a mobile phone or other device for calls and other interactive communication (and holding it at some stage during that process).” That means the law, as written, only prohibits use of a hand-held mobile device when it is being used to make a phone call, or other “interactive communication”. That potentially means the law does not prohibit filming a video, taking a photo, playing a game or other functions that don’t require two-way communication. However, in their conclusion, Justice Thirlwall and Justice Goss stated it “should not be thought that this is a green light for people to make films as they drive”, noting that such behaviour could result in drivers being charged with careless or dangerous driving. The law banning mobile phone use when driving was written before the widespread take-up of smartphones and it is likely that the loophole uncovered by the ruling could now be closed – although the two high court Justices noted that “whether a review of the regulations is necessary to take account of the myriad current and potentially dangerous uses of a mobile phone or other device while driving is a matter for Parliament, not the
Origin: Driver who filmed video on phone cleared by high court
Buy It! This wide-body 1991 Acura NSX packs a hidden surprise
The NSX is Hondas idea of a supercar, but for some, it isnt quite super enough. Lots of NSXes are modified under the hood, but few take liberties with the frankly perfect styling. This wide-body example challenges the norm.The kit youre looking at is one of only two made, with the car wearing the other one remaining in Toyko.The changes wrapped up in it include a roof scoop; vented side skirt extensions; exposed headlights; a rear wing; and four round taillights.If youre worried about hitting the rare kit on speed bumps, the car is also equipped with an air lift system; Zeal coilovers keep it planted when youre far away from traffic-calming devices.The 3.0-litre VTEC V6 has been upgraded with a CT Engineering supercharger, ECU tune, and a new exhaust, as well as a Comptech intake system, all which add up to 351.8 horsepower according to the included dyno sheet. The dyno sheet also shows the engine spins up to almost 8,000 rpm.A five-speed transmission connects the power to the rear wheels, which are Enkei RPF1s. The wheels are a nice fit here, with just the right width, and the car is lowered nicely to fill up the wheel well.While the wide-body kit might be divisive for some, we think it gives off great Midnight Club vibes. Our only complaint may be the colour; a dark shade of red or blue would give this thing more street cred.In 28 years, this NSX has managed to amass only 39,900 miles, with 4,000 of those being the current owners, who has had the car since 2005. Find it on Bring a
Origin: Buy It! This wide-body 1991 Acura NSX packs a hidden surprise
Ferrari orders fashion designer to take his shoes off his car
Ferrari is ordering a fashion designer to remove an Instagram photo of his shoes on the back of a Ferrari a car that he owns and paid for The Fashion Law reports.At first, the cease-and-desist order sounds ridiculous, but Ferrari actually has a case.The argument goes the Ferrari brand name invokes a sense of luxury and exclusivity, so displaying any other brand alongside it makes or attempts to make that brand seem luxurious and exclusive, too.According to the letter to designer Phillipp Plein from Ferraris outside counsel Fabrizio Sanna, Pleins photo attempts to associate the automaker with a lifestyle (that is) totally inconsistent with (its) brand perception.The undesired connection between Ferraris trademarks on the one hand, and Philipp Pleins line of shoes (and the questionable manner in which they are promoted) on the other hand, is interfering negatively with the rights enjoyed by Ferraris selected licensees, which are exclusively entitled to use Ferraris trademarks to produce and promote line of shoes Ferrari branded, the letter reads. View this post on Instagram 50 shades of 🍏 🍏 🍏 A post shared by Philipp Plein (@philippplein) on Jun 30, 2019 at 9:10am PDTComplicating matters is the questionable manner in which Pleins fashions are promoted: in the past, Plein paid Chris Brown, whos faced felony charges for rape, sexual battery and assault (among countless other allegations) to take the stage (at his S/S18 fashion show) alongside Tekashi 6ix9ine, the rapper currently facing jail time for pleading guilty to sleeping with an underage girl and filming the act, according to GQ.Plein has called the letter blackmail, but he might want to stop and think about how all the above-mentioned context doesnt put his brand in the best light.Plein has 48 hours to comply with the formal ask, lest Ferrari bring such unlawful, unfair and harmful behavior to the attention of the Courts.Our take? Keep your stupid $800 shoes and your gaudy-green-wrapped $350,000 Ferrari 812 Superfast away from us,
Origin: Ferrari orders fashion designer to take his shoes off his car
SUV Review: 2019 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S
OVERVIEW Small Merc crossover gets big muscles PROSSpectacular engine, luxurious and reasonably comfortable, plenty of utility CONSOptions add up quickly, low speed transmission jerkiness, potential for high-speed driver jerk-ness VALUE FOR MONEYfair WHAT TO CHANGE?Smooth out that transmission HOW TO SPEC IT?Load it up, you’ve come this far Theres a delicious irony associated with muscle-bound SUVs, and this 2019 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S is particularly tasty. Historically, AMG has proven quite adept at squeezing big engines into unsuspecting Benzs, so lets cast our eyes upon this rolling dichotomy: a normally four-cylinder-powered compact Mercedes crossover pounding all comers into submission with a 503 hp, 516 lb-ft bi-turbo 4.0-litre AMG V8. Cue the hilarity.The GLC 63 Ss 4Matic all-wheel-dive, nine-speed auto and electronically controlled limited slip rear differential come from the E 63 S uber sedan, so yes, this small SUV is armed to the teeth. Keeping body motions in check are air springs and adaptive dampers, and while the ride is pretty firm at all times, it never crosses over to uncomfortable or jarring.This uber GLC gets the toothy AMG Panamericana grille, and here it manages to look fabulously menacing yet still sophisticated, which is in keeping with the rest of the GLC 63 Ss disposition. The staggered 21-inch rollers (265/40R21 front, 295/35R21 rear) fill the wheel wells, and the car crouches on the tarmac with ominous purpose. The optional $1,000 AMG Night Package dresses it up with gloss black trim and black chrome exhaust tips. The cabin gets super supportive AMG sport seats and a three-spoke flat-bottom AMG steering wheel. The $5,800 Premium Package bestows proximity key with push-button start, garage door opener, Active Park Assist, AMG Track Pack, touch pad controller, 360-degree camera, navigation, Burmester audio, foot-activated power tailgate and a handy 115V outlet. The $2,700 Intelligent Drive Package adds the expected suite of safety systems and driver aids.All indications suggest the Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S might be a hairy beast intent on harming all who dare venture within. On the contrary, when driven with civility it comes across as an impressively sorted, perfectly tame crossover that handles very well while also possessing a, ahem, nice reserve of power. However, select Sport+ Mode and flex the right foot a bit and the 63s Mr. Hyde side leaps to the foreground. The suspension firms up, throttle sharpens and transmission mapping gets all in-yer-face. The rear bias of the 4Matic system lets itself be known too.This tester was still wearing winter tires, so I cant really comment on its ultimate grip and handling prowess, but still, the GLC always felt planted and predictable, directed by sharp, feelsome steering and brought into check via strong and easily modulated brakes. It wont handle with the fluidity of the benchmark Porsche Macan, being more muscle car than true sophisticate. But then, thats the whole point, isnt it?This hand-built AMG 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 is a masterpiece. Known as hot-V configuration, the turbos nestle within the V of the engine where normally the intake hardware would be. Turbo lag is a non-issue, and power is delivered in a linear rush right up to the redline. It sounds the business too, barking out a symphony of howls, cackles and pops thatll send nearby rodents into early hibernation. How AMG makes a relatively small turbocharged V8 sound like a naturally-aspirated big block without any piped-in audio fakery, I should add is some kind of voodoo magic.About the only complaint one might register is the occasional low-speed jerky shifts from the nine-speed, wet-clutch automatic transmission. A subtle hint, perhaps, that this dog wants off its leash.Yes, the 2019 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S is deliciously nuts, but what a guilty pleasure. It has all the utility of the regular GLC, will tow up to 1,588 kg (3,500 pounds) with the optional $750 hitch, but can also blast you to 100 km/h in under four seconds. Does anybody need this? Heck no. But the fact that Mercedes-AMG produces it is a wonderful thing. And interestingly, the Americans dont get this S version, making do with a mere 469 hp, while we in Canuckia have only the 503-hp S on the menu.Price? Base sticker is $90,500 but as is the way with such things, this tester has almost 20 grand in upgrades. For those who want the most muscle-bound compact brute-ute extant, and can afford it, the 2019 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S will be worth every
Origin: SUV Review: 2019 Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S
Analysis: why the public is split on speed limiters
The recent burst of publicity around the mandatory introduction of speed limiters on new cars from 2022 has certainly brought them to the attention of car buyers. But how will they be received? Are they seen as a brilliant safety initiative that will save lives or an Orwellian intrusion adding to the danger of our roads by taking control away from the driver? Market research firm Simpson Carpenter questioned more than 1000 car buyers on behalf of Autocar to find out. Supporters of speed limiters outnumber opponents by two to one: 49% are in favour of speed limiters, while 24% are opposed. But those with strong feelings on an issue are always the most vocal and here the gap is much narrower – 18% are strongly in favour while 12% are strongly opposed. Support for speed limiters is strongest among women and those intending to buy a hybrid or electric car next time. The most strongly opposed are those whose car has an engine size of 2.0 litres or bigger. Among this group, there are as many opponents as supporters (39% in each camp) and opponents are nearly twice as likely to feel strongly about the issue as supporters. Reasons given spontaneously for favouring speed limiters focus on the expected improvement in road safety and the reduction in the number of people speeding. Among supporters, those intending to buy a hybrid or electric car next time round are much more likely to point to road safety and reducing accidents as the reasons for their support. Older drivers are more likely to cite the reduction in the numbers speeding. Questioned in more detail, a strong majority of car buyers agree that reducing speeds will be good for the environment and will save thousands of lives each year. Nevertheless, there are major reservations: more than half think that drivers are better than technology at deciding on the right speed. Nearly half (47%) think speed limiters are a major intrusion into personal liberty and 41% believe they’ll cause more accidents than they prevent. What is remarkable is the stark difference in opinion between those in favour and those opposed to speed limiters, particularly in relation to their safety benefits and their intrusiveness. Nine in 10 of those in favour believe speed limiters will save thousands of lives each year. In contrast, more than eight in 10 of those opposed believe speed limiters will cause more accidents than they prevent. Almost nine in 10 opponents see them as a major intrusion into personal liberty, with as many as six in 10 feeling very strongly about their intrusiveness. The bad news for the industry is that many new car buyers plan to take avoiding action. Half of those against speed limiters say they will delay their next purchase so they can keep on driving without restriction and a further 30% say they will buy used rather than new. Even among those in favour of speed limiters in principle, nearly one in four will seek to avoid them. The good news is that one in four of those who support speed limiters say they would now be more likely to buy a new car. However, the net effect looks like being another drag on new car
Origin: Analysis: why the public is split on speed limiters
Audi E-tron 50 revealed as value version of flagship EV
Audi has revealed the E-tron 50 as a cheaper and lighter version of its flagship electric SUV. Due to arrive in the UK in early 2020, the new variant weighs roughly 120kg less than the 2565kg E-tron 55, primarily as a result of its smaller battery pack. The E-tron 50’s 71kWh pack – likely to be the lowest-capacity battery Audi will offer in the E-tron – enables it to achieve a range of up to 186 miles on the WLTP test cycle. That’s 55 miles fewer than the 95kWh E-tron 55. By comparison, the E-tron’s main rival, the Mercedes-Benz EQC, has a WLTP-certified range of 259 miles in its standard 400 form. A future lower-spec variant could be expected to offer less than 200 miles. While the E-tron 55 is compatible with 150kW chargers, the E-tron 50 can only accept up to 120kW. It can still, however, be charged to 80% in approximately half an hour at a rapid-charging station. The E-tron 50 is also less potent than the E-tron 55. It employs the same twin-motor setup, but maximum power is down from 402bhp to 308bhp and maximum torque is down from 490lb ft to 398lb ft. The E-tron 50 has a 0-62mph time of 7.0sec and an electronically limited top speed of 118mph. Regenerative braking technology recuperates energy in more than 90% of brake applications, working alongside an electrohydraulic brake assistance system that activates when braking force exceeds 0.3g. Audi says this “results in short braking distances in all situations”. The E-tron 50 will be built alongside the more powerful version at Audi’s EV production facility in Forest, Belgium. Exact pricing is yet to be confirmed, but the E-tron 55 can be expected to cost around £10,000 less than the E-tron 55, which starts at £71,520 before government grants. Audi isn’t the only manufacturer to offer a range of battery sizes across its new family of electric vehicles. Tesla has long employed this strategy, while the new Volkswagen ID 3 hatchback will be offered with three different units when it launches later this year, with range rising from 205 miles in the entry-level model to 342 miles at the top of the
Origin: Audi E-tron 50 revealed as value version of flagship EV