Ford Puma ST: Prototypes of new hot crossover spotted

Ford is understood to be readying an ST version of its new Puma SUV, and now what look like prototypes of the model are being tested on the road.  It’s clear despite the disguise that this is no ordinary Puma, as it sports a prominent lower bodykit wrapping around the car from the splitter-style front bumper to a new rear bumper designed around a twin exhaust tailpipe – the same as the Fiesta ST. Bigger wheels appear to hide larger diameter front brakes, too, while the Puma seems lower to the ground than stock, suggesting a bespoke suspension setup. Ford global development boss Hau Thai-Tang told Autocar earlier this year that the Puma “would be a good place for us to look” in expanding the ST range beyond the Fiesta and Focus in Europe.  Thai-Tang stopped short of confirming the model for production, but it is understood that the project is set to be given the green light, with the Puma ST sharing its key running gear, including a 197bhp 1.5-litre three-cylinder turbo engine, with the Fiesta ST. Early development mules have already been seen testing at the Nürburgring.  An ST version of the Puma (as rendered below by Autocar) would be unlikely to vary drastically from the ST Line version of the car, which was revealed back in April. But we can expect a bespoke chassis setup, possibly including an optional limited-slip differential, selectable drive modes and a launch control function. Thai-Tang said Ford is keen to continue leveraging its Ford Performance arm for road car development, but the company would not simply look to create an ST version of each car. In addition to its two European hot hatches, Ford also makes ST versions of its Edge and Explorer large SUVs.  “We look at creating STs by very objective measures to make sure it is credible as an ST,” said Thai-Tang. “Do we have the right building blocks (on which to base it)?”  A new Focus RS is also understood to be in development, but it’s unlikely to appear before 2022, after the Focus’s mid-life update.  “We have nothing to announce but we recognise the importance of that car,” said Thai-Tang.  It is understood that hybrid power is one consideration for the Focus RS. “We’ll see where we go,” Ford’s automotive president Joe Hinrichs said. “The world is changing on powertrain and propulsion. No hints, but there’s a lot to talk
Origin: Ford Puma ST: Prototypes of new hot crossover spotted

Vauxhall to revive VXR performance line with hot Corsa

Vauxhall is planning a revival of its now-dormant performance sub-brand, VXR, and a hot Corsa is on the cards as the next model in the pipeline.  Although a source at the firm indicated that Vauxhall’s rival to Ford’s ST and Honda’s Type R is “in a bit of a hiatus now”, Autocar understands company executives are considering a return to the hot hatch sphere in the near future.  There was some concern that new owner PSA, engaged in a dramatic profit-driven turnaround of the Luton brand, would consign VXR to the history books.  The French firm is yet to officially confirm a new GTI version of the Corsa’s platform-sharing sibling, the Peugeot 208. But bosses are understood to be waiting to decide between petrol or electric propulsion for a new hot supermini, likely based on how sales of the standard electric variant take off.  The Corsa is considered the best hope for a revival of VXR on account of its historic sales success in the UK, and in mainland Europe as an Opel. The past three generations of the Corsa have been available with VXR variants.  The chosen power source for a new Corsa VXR will hinge on PSA’s decision for the 208 GTi. Our source was keen to point out that the VXR sub-brand is synonymous for being “track focused, a bit lairy and very much hardcore” – qualities that would suggest petrol power is the most natural fit. An output of more than 200bhp would be needed to compete with the best in the small hot hatch sector, the Ford Fiesta ST.  A decision has yet to be made on the exact debut date for a performance-oriented Corsa, but insiders suggest nothing will arrive until 2021 at the earliest.  The brand is first focusing on rolling out the models that are core to its crucial electrification strategy, including the new Corsa, plug-in hybrid Grandland X and the new Mokka, which is due next year and will join its supermini sibling in being offered as a pure-electric version.  Also arriving in 2021 will be an all-new Astra, based on PSA’s modular EMP2 platform, unlike the current GM-developed car. The new Astra will almost certainly include an electric version alongside regular petrol and diesel units, although EMP2 hasn’t been developed to take hybrid
Origin: Vauxhall to revive VXR performance line with hot Corsa

Car Review: 2020 BMW M340i xDrive

OVERVIEW Competent sport sedan but a bit lacking in soul department PROSVery fast, handles well, comfy seats CONSStyling is good not great, and HVAC controls are not intuitive VALUE FOR MONEYGood WHAT TO CHANGE?More intuitive HVAC panel and more exhaust tone would be nice HOW TO SPEC IT?As you see it Is it possible for a car to be good at everything but still leave you cold? BMW used to own the sporty sedan segment and dominated magazine comparisons, but the past 15 years have seen new competitors spring up and others get more serious. The naturally aspirated engines are gone, and the M brand has grown to encompass more vehicles like this M340i. The question is: Is it good enough to be good in 2019?The M340i recipe starts out with some very good ingredients. It gets a turbocharged 3.0L inline-six making 382 horsepower, a stout 127-horsepower increase over the base 330is 2.0L turbo-four. It also costs a stout $14,950 more than the base 330i; thats a considerable premium. In addition to the brawny engine, the M340i gives you an M Sport tuned differential and a host of exterior upgrades including distinctive (but fake) exhaust tips, and a unique grill with aerodynamic shutters. Our tester was also equipped with $800 adaptive sport suspension and the comically named Premium Excellence package, which equipped it with niceties like heated front and rear seats, interior ambient lighting, laser headlights, a head-up display, a premium Harman/Kardon sound system, and more. All this premium excellence put the M340i at $72,200 out the door. A lot of money to be sure, but fair for a 382-horsepower sport sedan. On the road, its apparent nobody has told the little M340i its not a real M car. The BMW blasts from zero to 100 km/h in just 4.4 seconds. BMW no longer offers a manual, but the shifts of the eight-speed automatic are crisp and the exhaust note sings that famous BMW song, even if it is running through a turbocharger. The BMW also does a very good job of disguising its AWD layout. The system is a boon for winter driving, but it feels like a RWD car most of the time. Turning circle seems to have been affected by running driveshafts to the front wheels, however. But on a twisting road, the M340i feels nimble, sporty, and capable. It also makes plenty of pops and bangs from the exhaust while in Sport mode.Inside, the 340i xDrive is excellent. BMW has clearly spent a lot of time making this wood and leather cocoon an extremely nice place to sit. The interior dimensions are ample and the front seat room is excellent. I especially liked the so-called Cognac Vernasca leather used throughout; the colour and feel is exactly what youd expect from a premium car. Wood trim is used throughout and while it feels legit, it seems out of place in such a tech-heavy car. The centre console houses the shifter and the iDrive infotainment control wheel. Both of these will feel familiar to previous BMW owners, but will take a bit of getting used-to for those coming from other brands. The infotainment system was housed in a dash-top screen canted towards the driver and while the system is beautiful to look at and quick to respond, its overly granular and can take a while to master. My biggest interior gripe was the controls used for the climate control. They were mostly housed in a small aluminum panel with an equally small screen above it to show fan speed, temperature and air direction. The buttons themselves are small, and in bright sunlight, can be hard to read. Also toggling the A/C on and off requires you dive several layers deep into the touchscreen menu. Theres no reason it should be that difficult. I accidentally proved there was no need to have an X3 when I forgot that the M340i was my only car for the week and needed to move several items of furniture across town. Luckily for my organizationally challenged self, each of the BMWs rear seats folds down individually and while they dont fold flat, they leave a pretty generous pass-through. The trunk itself is also rather large.And thus we seem to have found a car with no real faults. The BMW M340i xDrive is fast, drives well, sounds good, costs plenty but offers good value for the price, and it looks sharp to boot. And yet, it doesnt inspire love in the same way that people adore the E30-generation 3 Series. It just feels cold. Theres no factual reason for it and it is entirely possible that I may just be crazy, but while the M340i is extremely capable, its just not a vehicle that warms your
Origin: Car Review: 2020 BMW M340i xDrive

James Ruppert: with small cars, choose substance over style

It’s funny how some car buyers just want something that is funky-looking and on-trend, when really all they need is a hard-working hatchback. Here’s what Ryan said to me: “Hey James, I’m looking for a small and cheap motor to run between local schools for my sports coaching company. I’ve looked at a Smart car and a Toyota iQ. Could you recommend any?”  Well, the Smart is quite an old bit of kit now and the Toyota iQ is no longer with us but that doesn’t make them bad choices. The Smart is well proven and the Toyota is a Toyota, so it won’t break down. Both are small and neither is that cheap, although a tidy 2003 Fortwo Passion with 50k miles is around a grand and a proper warranted iQ from 2009 is £2500. That’s not too bad, but if you’re using a small car for work, it can turn out to be not that practical – especially a minimally booted Smart. That’s why an old-school shopping hatch is always going to be a better idea.  The Ford Ka won’t be around for that much longer, but I rather like them. I was surprised that a pre-Aston grille example from 2009 is just over £1000. The mileage was 100k, but it had service stamps and was at a dealer, so they had a responsibility if anything was awry. For that money, it would be a three-door 1.2 Zetec.  Ryan might find he wants a couple more doors, so let’s think Kia Picanto. They’re mostly privately owned and well looked after. Picantos have tiny wheels and do look a bit toy-town, but a 2004 1.1 SE with lots of MOT and a fresh service for £700 is pretty good going. It would do a spectacular job and keep Ryan running for a year without a worry, proper cheap motoring and high-50s economy.  At this point, Ryan came back to me. The Ka seemed to fit his criteria pretty closely and I had mentioned the Toyota Aygo in passing, but he was unaware of the badge engineering which also created the Citroën C1 and Peugeot 107. A 2008 1.0, for instance, is £20 road tax and, with 100,000 miles showing, costs £750. So that’s a contender. Ryan, though, had his head turned by a Volkswagen Up. More style over substance? I like them, but Ryan would struggle to get very much below £3000 and he would be dodging insurance write-offs to do it. But if he wants to Up his budget, then by all means do it.  New small cars are going out of fashion, but used ones will be around for some time to come yet. It’s the continuing beauty of buying used. What we almost bought this week Once we’d mastered the name and sampled the eager motor and kart-like handling, the Sporting won a place in our heart. This 1996 car with 36,000 miles, full history and one former keeper brings it all back. It’s just £2295. Best feature? The sporty red seatbelts. Tales from Ruppert’s garage The immediate follow-up to last week’s fat-pin-in-tyre crisis: the Michelin Fit2Go tyre checker said the pressure was dropping fast, and a tyre specialist condemned the rubber. Given that the car belongs to Miss Ruppert, it’s up to her to do the shopping around. She found a 205/55 R16 19W Michelin Energy Saver to match the rest for £76 fitted. At times like these, a good old-fashioned space saver would really help, and my daughter wasn’t keen on using a tin of tyre gunge. The garage, though, took the car in a day early.  Reader’s ride Skoda Fabia vRS: Here is part two of Nick’s inspiring tale, which began last week with his Peugeot 206 banger.  “My colleague’s granny bought a Skoda Fabia vRS diesel new in 2004 and then passed it on a couple of years back. It’s done 99,000 miles with full history but it isn’t perfect: the bushes need replacing, the fuel cap doesn’t clip shut, the radio maintains a poor grasp on a signal and the bonnet is sun-bleached. But I’m now stopping at the pumps once every seven days rather than every four. It cost me £700 with no increase on my insurance. I put a fresh MOT on the Peugeot 206 and sold it – for £700. I’d call that a free upgrade!” Readers’ questions Question: I’ve seen a oneowner, 2015 BMW i3 Range Extender with 77k miles for £12,950. It would be my first EV. Does it sound like a good buy? Don Shelby, Bristol Answer: The range extender version is no longer made so used ones are sought after. You can expect up to 180 miles of range from the car compared with 100 miles max from the regular i3. If the batteries have always been topped up and the extender never used, the 650cc motor occasionally cuts in to keep itself fresh. Its servicing is condition-based and should be recorded on the key fob. However, the motor was subject to recalls, so check they were actioned. All being well, it sounds good. John Evans Question: I’m planning a driving trip after October, but how will Brexit affect my EU driving entitlement? Simon Fisher, via email Answer: It’s all still a bit uncertain but there’s nothing like being prepared so get an international driving permit, find that old GB sticker in your garage and pack the car’s V5 along with your motor insurance green
Origin: James Ruppert: with small cars, choose substance over style

Autocar confidential: Alfa plots next-gen Giulia, Pininfarina’s usable hypercar and more

In this week’s round-up of automotive gossip, we hear how Volkswagen’s inching nearer to a brand-wide electric revolution, why Pininfarina thinks its Battista has the edge over the Aston Martin Valkyrie and more.  New plan for Milan’s sedan Sales of Alfa Romeo’s critically well-received Giulia are not strong, saloons being a declining segment – and FCA’s European design boss Klaus Busse says Alfa is already thinking about what kind of vehicle might replace it. “We have an idea, but it’s too early to share,” he said.  Vorsprung durch tech-quick  Audi exterior design chief Andreas Mindt said the E-tron GT, the firm’s Tesla Model S-rivalling flagship electric saloon, is a “miracle”, owing to its short development time. He added that “our competitors will be shocked” by the performance of the production version, due next year with Porsche Taycan underpinnings.  Pininfarina’s 1900bhp runabout Pininfarina boss Michael Perschke reckons the forthcoming 1900bhp Battista EV shouldn’t be compared with track-focused machines such as the Aston Martin Valkyrie. Perschke said the Valkyrie is “designed with a different purpose: it’s a collector’s item for crazy guys who want a track tool, but are probably never going to use it to its best. Our purpose is to give you a car you can drive on a daily basis and, if you want to go on a race track and clock more than 200mph, it’s doable.”  Volkswagen’s new ‘green’ house Volkswagen is converting its Zwickau factory in Germany from Golf and Passat assembly into its first home for electric car production. The site should be ready in the next couple of months. In time, up to 330,000 electric cars a year will be built there for VW, Audi and Seat, the first being the VW ID hatch due next
Origin: Autocar confidential: Alfa plots next-gen Giulia, Pininfarina’s usable hypercar and more

Motorcycle Review: 2019 Yamaha Niken GT

I really thought there’d be more gaping, Sideways glances to be sure. Questions even. Some quizzical looks at the very least. Especially from any seasoned motorcyclists that happened by. Maybe even a few curious car guys would manage the casual WTF that is common to every gearhead, even if that particular form of motorization isn’t their gig.But no, the Niken GT, odd double fork arrangement, desultory predatory beak and a front-to-rear weight imbalance that only a mother could love, barely garnered a sideways glance. Oh, there was the occasional gawk and one or two instances of sincere staring, but nobody asked me what it’s like to steer a motorcycle with two front wheels. There were no queries as to its ability to lean into corners, whether it could stand up by itself or even — and this was something I would have asked considering the state of the roads in my home of Toronto — does having two front tires mean you hit twice as many bumps.But there was none of that. Nothing. Nada. Not a single query. I don’t know what it means when a motorcycle company produces something as genuinely outrageous as the Niken and its Leaning Multi-Wheel Technology — for that is Yamaha’s official name for the GT’s novel front suspension — and nobody notices, but that’s exactly what happened. Is the outrageous now so commonplace that it barely garners a second glance? Or am I really the only one interested, the remnants of my now 40-year-old engineering degree the source of an uncommon curiosity. I don’t know. But like I said, I was surprised at the lack of reaction from passersby. Whatever the case, the three-wheeled Niken was the bike I was most eager to test this summer. Oh, I’ve seen — and driven — more than my share of three-wheelers over the years, from Harley’s two-wheel-in-the-back Freewheeler to Can-Am’s only slightly less ungainly Spyder with its twin wheels in the front. But, front or rear oriented, they were basically the same, just a car with one less wheel. No leaning in turns, no scraping of footpeg to be had. In fact, neither alternative offered much in the way of the traditional motorcycling experience other than getting wet in the rain.Not the Niken. Two wheels it might have in front, but the way that Yamaha has arranged those twin forks and other joints and linkages, the GT feels very familiar. Oh, the width of the front end — both mechanical bits and the bodywork — surprises and one does have to get used to the weight at walking speeds. But it steers like a motorcycle, stops like a motorcycle and will topple over like a motorcycle if you don’t put your feet down at stoplights.Indeed, other than being a little ponderous at the slowest of crawling speeds (caused by the friction of two tire contact patches) and then a smidge reluctant to turn at very high speeds (this time the result of the extra gyroscopic forces of two wheels), the Niken felt every bit the common motorcycle on most roads. Countersteer into corners and the GT leaned over with a neutrality of steering belying its odd front end. Grab the front brake and you have twin contact patches to scrub off speed.All normal. Why the twinned front end then, you ask? Well, firstly, Yamaha has a history of this funny front end stuff. Back in the ‘90s it produced the equally novel GTS1000 with a James Parker-designed front wishbone suspension. Technologically speaking, however, the Niken’s twin front tires are of particular benefit when the road turns nasty, especially wet and nasty. With two front tires, grip at the front is heightened when a single tire might hunt for grip. Likewise with two wheels, if a bump sends one wheel careening while you’re leaned over, there’s still one more to hold down the fort. On a dry, well-paved road, the Niken is no quicker than the Tracer GT from which it liberates its 847-cc three-cylinder engine. On a wet, frost-heaved road, you’d likely feel much more confident aboard the three-wheeler than anything with just two.If the novel suspension layout has any weakness, it is that it highlights the limits of the rear shock Yamaha chose. Where the front end is particularly well damped and compliant, the rear shock is more than a little stiff. Bumps that the front end barely skips over send a shock through the rear end. With all the effort it put into the front suspension, I don’t understand why Yamaha didn’t install a superior rear shock.As, for the rest of the Niken, it is very much a comfortable “GT” bike, the seating position — wide adventure-style handlebar, wide, flat seat and low footpegs — calibrated to eat up miles. Despite the growl from the engine, there’s precious little vibration in the handlebar and the seat is amongst the most comfortable available on stock motorcycles. As to the heart of the Niken, the aforementioned 847-cc triple, it’s one of the sweethearts in Yamaha’s lineup. Torquier than a four, more growly than a twin, three cylinders strike a nice balance between two and four. Its 115 or so
Origin: Motorcycle Review: 2019 Yamaha Niken GT

Ian Callum revives Aston Martin Vanquish for debut project

Former Jaguar design boss Ian Callum and his new Callum design group are planning to build a batch of comprehensively rethought and re-engineered Aston Martin Vanquish V12s as their new business’s first bespoke car project.  Delivery of finished cars is due to start late this year and the full batch of 25 should be completed and delivered at the end of 2020. Each car is expected to cost around £400,000.  The Astons will be returned to bare metal and rebuilt from scratch in Callum’s new Warwick-based workshops. They will incorporate dozens of subtle and not so subtle changes, some of which Ian Callum has wanted to make since his original Vanquish design hit production in 2001.  “There are things on the car I’ve always wanted to fix,” he said. “Now I have the chance.”  One strong theme running through the whole car is a unique fabric and trim pattern that Ian Callum, a loyal Scot, calls his “abstract tartan”. It appears in the Vanquish in surprising places, such as air outlets and speaker grilles, as well as seating and trim panels and will be used on Callum cars in future.  The partners at Callum have already built two Vanquish prototypes, one to show off their body and cabin developments and another to perfect a new suspension set-up that runs to bigger wheels and tyres, stiffer springs and dampers plus changes to anti-roll bars and suspension bushes.  All cars also get larger-diameter carbon-ceramic brakes plus new 20in wheels that use the Vanquish’s original pattern but are now offset to improve stability and stance.  Each V12 engine gets software, camshaft and exhaust changes to boost its power by around 60bhp to between 500bhp and 600bhp, depending on the model. A modern six-speed torque-converter automatic is offered, although many owners are expected to stick with the Vanquish’s original automated manual gearbox.  Ian Callum’s “new old” Aston is still very recognisable as an original Vanquish but has many modern details. There’s a new-style front bumper and grille, the latter subtly framed with carbonfibre and its horizontal bars most prominent. The lights are new LED units and the old, round foglights (Callum calls them “frog eyes”) are dropped in favour of air scoops for the bigger front brakes. There are new-design exterior mirrors (“we’ve dropped the old boxing gloves”) plus handsome side skirts incorporating a four-notch design that will become a feature of future Callum cars.  The exhaust’s back box has been reduced in size and incorporated into the rear bumper assembly to improve the efficiency of the rear diffuser and the car gets new LED tail-lights, an unusual and expensive feature (but necessary, Ian Callum insists).  More subtle improvements abound. Special Michelin tyres carry the Callum tartan on their sidewalls. The side windows are framed with specially fabricated trim pieces (not the Jaguar cast-offs of the original). The interior is completely retrimmed over new architecture, with the emphasis on high-quality materials and execution. The new front seats adopt a more sporting profile and the tiny rear seats have been ditched in favour of better accommodation for those in the front. There’s a new screen-based HMI and a demountable Bremont watch is fitted into the centre of every fascia.  Although Ian Callum left Jaguar only a couple of months ago, his design partners — David Fairbairn, Adam Donfrancesco and Tim Bird — have been working on the project for much longer. “We want to get back to making things,” said Ian Callum. “The idea is to do bespoke projects for customers as individuals.”  The original Vanquish, born from a 1998 concept designed by Ian Callum before he joined Jaguar, introduced a new era of Aston design and construction in 2001 that led directly to the successful years of the DB9 and smaller V8 Vantage. The car, although handsome, never found buyers as readily as others and was discontinued in favour of a new, DB9-based Vanquish in 2007.  Donor Astons for the Callum treatment will come either from existing owners or the company will source suitable cars itself. A fairly restricted series of colours and interior treatments will be offered: Ian Callum and his colleagues aren’t keen to over-decorate their cars or offer wide colour or trim palettes. They hope customers will accept ”design guidance” and customer reaction so far seems to back that up. “Put it this way,” said the designer bluntly: “If we don’t like it, we won’t build it. Opinion: This is design done differently It’s easy to view Ian Callum’s new design house, Callum, as one of those places that set out to change everything about a car, and to charge a lot for doing it, for very little rhyme or reason. Such places exist. But Warwick-based Callum already looks very different.  This first Vanquish project shows what they’re about: a design group with the restraint and good taste of those used to setting the best OEM (original equipment manufacturer) standards, freed from big
Origin: Ian Callum revives Aston Martin Vanquish for debut project

Porsche’s US$3,100-a-month subscription service is coming to Canada

2019 Porsche Cayenne SNick Tragianis / Driving Porsche is expanding its app-based subscription service to four new cities in the U.S. and Canada, deepening its experiment in flexible car ownership even as other automakers back away.The luxury sports-car brand of Volkswagen is adding Las Vegas, San Diego, Phoenix and Toronto to the pilot program it started in Atlanta almost two years ago.The price of its two-tiered monthly subscription service, Porsche Passport, will cost US$3,100 a month in the States; and $3,200 a month in Canada.In Canada, the first tier will let users swap between Porsches 718, Macan and Cayenne models and their variants; while the higher $4,200-per-month Accelerate level opens up the chance to drive its 911 and Panamera cars as well.Automakers are dangling subscriptions to try to reach younger consumers accustomed to streaming movies on Netflix or summoning rides from Uber, with mixed results. While Porsche and Mercedes-Benz are expanding their tests, General Motors pulled the plug on its Cadillac BOOK subscription service in December; and Volvo Cars is battling California car dealers over its Care by Volvo program, which combines lease, insurance and maintenance into one monthly payment.Its not fundamentally a cheaper way of consuming your mobility, said Mark Wakefield, head of the automotive practice at consultancy AlixPartners. There has to be enough people that want to pay for the convenience factor.Most subscription services cost more than a comparable three-year lease, which limits their growth potential, according to a study that car-shopping researcher Edmunds released last year.That may not be a problem for a company like Porsche. The US$2,100 tier of Porsche Passport is 20 per cent more expensive than leasing a Porsche for three years, the automaker said. Still, 180 people subscribed over the course of two years, 80 per cent of whom had never owned one before. Typical users were in their mid-40s, eight years younger than the average Porsche owner.The question is not a bookkeeping exercise or accounting; the question is how much are you willing to pay for that much freedom? said Klaus Zellmer, head of Porsche Cars North America.Monthly subscribers can drive as many as 20 different model variants, have vehicles delivered to them, and only pay for gas, after a US$595 one-time activation fee. Insurance and maintenance are included. Porsche chose the four additional cities based on their support of the brand and the companys expectation of
Origin: Porsche’s US$3,100-a-month subscription service is coming to Canada

Kia adds new PHEV options to Ceed SW and XCeed

Kia adds new PHEV options to Ceed SW and XCeed Both estate and crossover will get a new Kia electric powertrain Kia has revealed two new plug-in hybrid models to join the company’s electric line-up – the Ceed Sportswagon and XCeed crossover. Both models will get a new powertrain, which features an 8.9 kWh battery, good for an electric-only range of around 37 miles on a charge. It powers a 44.5 kW electric motor, which works with a 1.6 litre petrol engine for a combined output of 139 bhp and 265 Nm of torque. In terms of performance, the Ceed Sportswagon covers 0-62mph in 10.8 seconds, while the XCeed takes 0.2 seconds longer. Both see power transferred to to the front wheels via a six-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission. Both models will be offered with a Towing Pack, which is unusual for plug-in vehicles, and will appeal to a number of buyers, and they get Kia’s seven-year, 100,000 mile warranty. According to the company, one in seven new Kia cars sold in Europe in the first half of 2019 was electrified, and the new models will only add to that number. The Ceed SW and XCeed plug-in hybrids will go on sale across Europe in early 2020, with a UK on-sale date and specifications due to be confirmed closer to launch.
Origin: Kia adds new PHEV options to Ceed SW and XCeed

BMW reveals details of new X5 PHEV

BMW reveals details of new X5 PHEV The X5 xDrive45e gets a 24kWh battery pack BMW has launched a new version of its X5 xDrive45e, with this new generation PHEV offering a range of up to 54 miles on a single charge. This figure is possible because of a new 24 kWh battery – 21 kWh usable – added to the plug-in X5. This powers an 83 kW electric motor, which works with a 286 hp straight six petrol engine to produce a combined 394 hp (290 kW) and 600 Nm of torque. As such, the X5 is a quick SUV, completing the 0-62mph sprint in just 5.6 seconds – a 1.2 second reduction over the previous model. Despite this performance potential, the official efficiency figures come in at 27 – 44 g/km CO2 and 235.4 – 148.7 MPG, depending on specification. The electric motor’s efficiency is rated at between 23.1 and 28.3 kWh/100km. All of the above are calculated on the WLTP test cycle, which is a fairly reliable set of results as to what is achievable in real-world driving. Looking at the NEDC figures that the previous model was tested under, the electric driving range has more than tripled. Energy managements systems have been refined from earlier models, aiding drivers further in making the most of the electric driving potential. Familiar plug-in car systems such as regenerative braking, pre-conditioning, and charger timing are fitted. BMW calculates that the new X5 xDrive45e has a CO2 footprint 40% smaller than that of the comparable petrol-powered X5 xDrive40i, based on average European electricity mix. When using electricity from renewable sources, that figure is reduced by as much as 70%. UK pricing and specifications when the model goes on sale at a later date.
Origin: BMW reveals details of new X5 PHEV