2017 Chevrolet SilveradoChevrolet Transport Canada opened a probe June into 249,700 General Motors trucks and SUVs over whether the vehicles power brake systems could deteriorate prematurely, causing issues for owners and leading to incident or injury.The safety regulator is specifically looking at GMC Yukon, Cadillac Escalade and Chevrolet Suburban and Tahoe SUVs from model years 2015 through 2017; as well as light-duty Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra trucks from model years 2014 through 2017.The move follows the opening of an investigation last November by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) over the same issue.The NHTSA had received 487 reports from drivers of some GM trucks and SUVS alleging their vehicles required hard brake pedal effort to stop adequately, and that stopping distances were extended anyway. This was attributed to a deterioration of the engine-driven brake assist vacuum pump, reports Reuters.That group counted nine incidents of collisions related to poor braking; and two injuries among those reports, and launched its own probe into about 2.73 million SUVs and pickups from model years 2014 through
Origin: Transport Canada investigating 250,000 GM trucks, SUVs over braking issue
000
Porsche recalling almost 9,000 cars in Canada over rollaway risk
Almost 9,000 older Porsche sedans and SUVs are being recalled in Canada because a defect with their gear shifters may put them at risk of rolling away when their owners think theyve put them in PARK.Some 8,742 vehicles are affected in Canada, along with another 99,700 in the U.S., for a total of about 108,400.The specific models affected include Porsche Cayenne SUVs from 2004 through 2010; Cayenne S and Turbo SUVs from 2003 through 2006; and Cayenne Turbo S SUVs from the 2006 model year.Also affected are Porsche Panamera and Panamera 4 sedans from 2011 through 2016; Panamera S, 4 S and Turbo sedans from 2010 through 2016; and a wide variety of Turbo trims and 4 special editions from specific model years in the 2012 through 2016 range.In affected vehicles, a plastic bushing attached to the cable between the gear shifter and the gearbox may separate; even with the vehicle in PARK and the key removed, this means it may be possible for it to roll away.Porsche does not know of any injuries related to the defect, but has received numerous reports of the cables detaching. Porsche dealers will begin replacing the bushing in
Origin: Porsche recalling almost 9,000 cars in Canada over rollaway risk
Ford recalls 28,000 Explorers in Canada over increased crash risk
2017 Ford ExplorerHandout Ford mid-June recalled roughly 1.2 million Explorer SUVs in the U.S. and 28,000 in Canada over an issue with the rear suspension that may lead to diminished steering control and, in turn, an increased risk of a collision. On vehicles that see frequent full rear suspension articulation – that is, that regularly exercise the rear suspension across its full range of motion – the suspension’s toe link could fracture, making the truck harder to control. Ford Explorer SUVs from model years 2011 through 2017 built at the company’s Chicago plant may be affected. The automaker also launched a second recall the same day for the same issue, specifically for roughly 12,000 sedans and crossovers sold in parts of Canada. Affected vehicles in that recall include the 2009 through 2015 Lincoln MKS; 2009 through 2017 Ford Flex; and 2010 through 2017 Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKT if built in the company’s Chicago or Oakville, Ontario plants and sold in Alberta, Manitoba or Saskatchewan. While the Explorer toe link fracture led only to a single report so far or a truck hitting a curb, the Canadian sedan recall has resulted in at least one crash involving minor injuries. The repair in both recalls will see dealers replace the left- and right-hand rear suspension toe links with new forged units and re-align the
Origin: Ford recalls 28,000 Explorers in Canada over increased crash risk
Ram recalls over 38,000 pickups due to airbag issues
2019 Ram 1500 Laramie LonghornBrian Harper / Driving FCA is recalling 38,890 Ram 1500 pickup trucks from the 2019 and 2020 model years due to an internal error in the Occupant Restraint Controller (ORC) that can cause the airbags to turn off. This poses as a safety risk because the airbags may not deploy in a crash, which can cause serious injury, bodily harm, or perhaps even death. To fix the issue, Ram will notify affected vehicle’s owners and instruct them to take their pickups to a dealer, where the Occupant Restraint Controller will be inspected. If found to be faulty, the part will be replaced. If no fault is detected, then it will simply be updated. In Canada, 38,890 RAM 1500 pickup trucks are affected, but it’s estimated that just under 296,000 units are affected in the U.S. alone, along with 1,817 in Mexico and 6,154 outside the NAFTA region. Ram 1500 Classic pickups are not affected. The recall is expected to start on June 20. Customers can either check online, or contact FCA at 1-800-465-2001 and reference recall no. V61 or V71, to see if their trucks are
Origin: Ram recalls over 38,000 pickups due to airbag issues
Hertz launching car subscription service for US$1,000 per month
Hertz is joining a host of other companies, including several automakers, in offering a vehicle subscription service, which lets customers take home and used a borrowed car for an indefinite period of time, for a monthly fee. Labelled Hertz My Car (your author would have gone with Hertz My Ride, but whatever) the program will offer two different tiers of cars. Tier One is priced at US$999 per month and includes full-size sedans, small SUVs and trucks. Tier Two offers snazzy luxury sedans, regular SUVs and large trucks for US$1,399. Customers can exchange their vehicle twice a month for another make or model within the tier but, if they want to switch it up more frequently, they can do so for a US$75 surcharge. There’s also a one-time enrolment fee of US$250. The all-inclusive monthly subscription covers vehicle maintenance, roadside assistance, vehicle damage and limited liability protection. There’s a US$1,000 deductible if you beat stuff up, by the way. Hopefully Hertz has cleaned up its computer records, as a “glitch in the system” recently led to several people being summarily hauled away by the cops after Hertz reported the vehicles they were renting as stolen. One person apparently spent over a week behind bars while others tell tales of ending up on the business end of handcuffs before getting the whole mess sorted out. One thing that’s certain is that consumer preferences toward vehicle ownership and leasing are shifting. Hertz cites a survey by Cox Automotive that claims nearly 40 per cent of respondents said while access to transportation is necessary, owning a vehicle is not. For urban respondents, 57 per cent said private vehicle ownership is not necessary to get from point A to point B. Hertz My Ride kicks off in the cities of Austin and Atlanta, but sadly does not include any scheduled appearances by Xzibit or Chamillionaire at those launch
Origin: Hertz launching car subscription service for US$1,000 per month
VW brand to trim as many as 4,000 jobs amid digital overhaul
A Volkswagen badge on a Golf GTI steering wheel.Nick Tragianis / Driving Volkswagen’s main car brand will let lapse as many as 4,000 general and administrative jobs while adding at least 2,000 IT positions over the next four years, avoiding layoffs at its German factories as it negotiates a major shift toward electrification and self-driving cars. The move, brokered with VW’s powerful unions, includes job guarantees through 2029, the manufacturer said Wednesday in a statement. The brand will rely on partial retirement and attrition to help reach targeted staff reductions as it culls models and focuses on new technologies that require fewer factory workers. With earlier job cuts, VW is on track with a plan announced in March to improve profit by 5.9 billion euros (US$6.7 billion) a year, the unit’s chief operating officer, Ralf Brandstaetter, said in the statement. “We are making the company fit for the digital age in a sustainable way.” The prospect of deeper cutbacks had alarmed VW’s union leaders as manufacturers wrestle with the transformation of sprawling industrial operations. App-based services like ride-sharing and car-sharing are already threatening the industry’s traditional business model of individual car ownership — a trend that may accelerate once self-driving vehicles reach critical mass — and electric cars require fewer parts and workers for assembly. The extended job guarantee is “an important signal,” VW works council chief Bernd Osterloh said in Wolfsburg, near the company’s headquarters. VW signed a broader labor pact in 2016 to cull 30,000 jobs worldwide, with Germany accounting for 23,000, to generate about 3 billion euros in annual savings. The VW car brand, which accounts for about half the group’s global deliveries, employs roughly 110,000 workers in Germany out of a global workforce of 663,000 across the Volkswagen group, the world’s largest automaker. The unit has been pushing to rein in bloated expenses to lift profitability that’s trailing rivals like PSA
Origin: VW brand to trim as many as 4,000 jobs amid digital overhaul
How the scrappage scheme sold 39,000 Hyundai i10s
The beginning of April 2009 was a pretty miserable time in the British car industry. The Lehman Brothers bank collapse in 2008 had triggered financial meltdown on a global scale. Other financial institutions were at risk of collapse and car buyers – both fleets and private – kept their chequebooks in their pockets. As a result, car sales plummeted for a straight year. During the first three months of 2009, new car registrations were down by 30%. Total UK vehicle production was 57% lower than the year before. Showrooms were deserted and pens were poised over P45s. No one could have predicted that just a month later – 10 years ago this week – several dealers would be forced to install ticketing systems to manage the crowds in showrooms. The difference was scrappage, a scheme that was designed to keep the car industry afloat and get drivers to swap into less polluting, safer cars. It was controversial at the time and still causes resentment today. It propelled some manufacturers to stardom and sent nearly 400,000 cars, including some bona fide classics, to the crusher. How did it come about? And what effect has the scheme had on the market since? Convincing the government The main proponent of the scheme was the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, whose chief executive at the time was Paul Everitt. “Car sales were an important barometer of the economy and, month after month, registrations were going down,” he says. “There was a strong political will in Gordon Brown’s government to do something which would change the ‘weather’. The news talked of an impending financial collapse, and no one knew where the bottom was.” Consequently, there were meetings organised between industry CEOs, the SMMT and the government’s business secretary, Peter Mandelson. The industry pointed to the successful scrappage scheme in Germany and put a case for how it could work here in the UK. One of the industry executives Everitt took with him was Bill Parfitt, then chairman and managing director of GM in the UK. Parfitt recalls: “Mandelson was polite but not convinced at first. So I came at it from the manufacturing point of view as the slump was really hitting the component suppliers. I was nursing about six or seven of them at the time and if one went down it would have been a major problem for everybody because we’d have had to stop production and re-engineer the parts using a different supplier. That can take months. “Mandelson argued that scrappage would only suck in imports of cheaper small cars and people like Kia and Hyundai would gain a foothold in the market. He was right, of course, but I showed the upside with a series of sums showing what they would get from VAT and road fund licence, and also what would happen if a component company went bankrupt taking other companies with them. It was the supplier argument which won the day.” The scheme was finally announced in chancellor Alistair Darling’s budget statement, and although it had been widely expected, the actual details had been a closely guarded secret. The deal Darling dished up was not as generous as the German government’s as it gave a £2000 discount to the consumer but only half would come from the government – the other £1000 had to be given up by the manufacturer. Parfitt also worked out the mechanism that would ensure no one could cheat the system. Automated checks between government departments made sure the scrapped cars had a valid MOT, had been owned by the purchaser for more than 12 months and – crucially – were issued with a certificate of destruction to ensure they never returned to the road. Without it, the dealer wouldn’t get his money. This caused a flurry of calculator tapping in car company HQs as finance directors attempted to see if they could still make a profit. Showroom boom One maker that was prepared was Hyundai, whose managing director at the time was Tony Whitehorn. He explains: “At the beginning of 2009, we heard that scrappage was likely so I asked my German colleagues for advice, as they’d done really well with it. They said you needed stock. So I took a risk and ordered 7000 i10s – I usually ordered 1000 a month. The factory phoned up and assumed it was a mistake.” When scrappage was announced, Whitehorn was ready: “We had it all pre-planned based on several likely scrappage scenarios: price lists, press releases, everything. All the media wanted to talk about it and customers wanted to place orders, but none of our rivals were ready so they were turning down TV interview requests and customers. We took one of our ready-made plans off the shelf and we scooped up the buyers and got all the publicity.” Hyundai’s headline was that an i10 Classic could be had for £4995 after the scrappage discount, or £85 a month on finance. Hyundai sold all its first shipment before the boat had even docked. By the end of 2009, the brand had sold 39,000 cars under the scheme, more than doubling its 2008
Origin: How the scrappage scheme sold 39,000 Hyundai i10s
Total rebates of up to $10,000 cause EV supply shortage amongst B.C. dealers
2018 Nissan LeafHandout / Nissan The British Columbia provincial government is encouraging its citizens to buy electric vehicles with one of the best incentives known to man: free money. The province is echoing the federal government’s incentives with CEVforBC, a program that offers $2,500 rebates on the purchase of hybrids; and $5,000 on fully electric vehicles. But EV buyers in B.C. won’t just qualify for provincial incentives of up to $5,000; there are, of course, also new federal rebates. When it’s all added up, some B.C. shoppers could be looking at $10,000 in discounts. Combined with sky-high gas prices at the pumps, the appeal of the EV is so great for some B.C. shoppers that, as Automotive News Canada reports, some dealers are having trouble keeping EVs in stock. It’s huge,” James Hartley, sales manager at Morrey Nissan in Burnaby, told the outlet. “Every second customer wants to test-drive a Leaf. As of May 1 or just before that, people were coming in.” And demand is a wonderful thing, so long as you’ve got supply, which many currently don’t. Didier Marsaud, Nissan Canada spokesman, says the brand is working to get more cars to the places that need them within two months of ordering. “As we did last year to address the pickup of demand in Ontario just before the (EV incentive) program was canceled, we are working extremely hard to maximize our production to suffice our demand,” he told Automotive News Canada. “Last year we reached 60-day supply, which is the standard day supply for any vehicle.” An insatiable demand for your product is a good problem to have for EV makers and sellers, but for now it’s still a
Origin: Total rebates of up to $10,000 cause EV supply shortage amongst B.C. dealers
Couple loses $14,000 after buying stolen SUV covered by Manitoba Public Insurance
2015 Ford Explorer LimitedGraeme Fletcher When a Manitoba couple bought a used 2015 Ford Explorer for $14,500 from an independent seller last August, everything about the deal appeared legit. They had no idea the vehicle was one of thirteen taken from a Winnipeg used car dealership in an alleged inside job involving a former sales manager. The SUV looked and was running fine, and the paperwork was all there. Manitoba Public Insurance (MPI) was happy to cover the vehicle for its new owners, which as you’d expect made them feel completely safe in their new purchase. But all was not as it seemed, and soon the police came for the vehicle, seizing it and telling the owners it had been stolen from a Winnipeg dealership. According to the CBC, the vehicle hadn’t been reported stolen by the dealership, Auto List of Canada, when its new owners went to have it insured at MPI, which is why it didn’t set off any alarms. Normally the company’s system prevents registration of stolen vehicles, but police weren’t notified of the Explorer’s theft until two days after it had already been sold. It all unraveled for the thieves when a call from Winnipeg police informing Auto List of a stolen vehicle prompted the dealer to do a count—turns out 13 vehicles had disappeared from the lots. From there it was simply a matter of following the paper trail. Two men, including a former Auto List sales manager, have been charged with multiple counts of possessing stolen vehicles, forging bills of sale and transfer of ownership documents, and defrauding the purchasers. The hot Explorer was returned to Auto List, leaving the couple that purchased it out the full $14,500. MPI says they can attempt to bring legal action against the person who sold the hot SUV.
Origin: Couple loses $14,000 after buying stolen SUV covered by Manitoba Public Insurance
Ford will axe 7,000 workers by September in cost-saving efforts
A Ford employee works on the final assembly line for the Ford F-150 pickup in this file photo.Larry W. Smith When big companies use terms like “redesign” and “restructure,” you know the axe is going to fly. As part of its ongoing restructuring meant to cut costs and reduce bureaucracy, Ford has announced it will continue lopping off salaries through buyouts and job cuts, starting with 800 jobs by the end of June, and ramping up to 7,000 total by September. Most of the positions will be cut from overseas locations, with 2,300 jobs being lost in Canada and the U.S. According to the CBC, of those 2,300 from the U.S. and Canada, 1,500 cuts have already been made, with an estimated 500 more happening this week, followed by an additional 300 by August. In a letter to Ford employees, CEO Jim Hackett laid out the plan to lay off around 10 per cent of the company’s management workforce worldwide. Unlike the media coverage of the news which brings the job losses to the forefront, Ford’s internal email communication – published by CNBC in full here – is titled “Smart Redesign Update,” and doesn’t mention salary cuts until two-thirds of the way through the document. Sometimes it’s better to ease the people into the bad news. Ford is a family company and saying goodbye to colleagues is difficult and emotional, Hackett wrote in the email. We have moved away from past practices in some regions where team members who were separated had to leave immediately with their belongings, instead giving people the choice to stay for a few days to wrap up and say goodbye. He went on to encourage employees to “take a moment to thank them personally for their service and commitment to Ford.”
Origin: Ford will axe 7,000 workers by September in cost-saving efforts