President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at the Tupelo Regional Airport, November 26, 2018 in Tupelo, Mississippi.Drew Angerer / Getty Images The Trump administration has launched a multi-pronged legal assault on an agreement California struck with four carmakers in defiance of the presidents plan to ease national standards on tailpipe emissions.Lawyers from the Transportation Department and Environmental Protection Agency on Friday sent a letter to Californias top air-pollution regulator, urging the state to abandon its pact with the automakers and warning that actions to carry out the agreement appear to be unlawful and invalid.Separately, the Justice Department has opened an antitrust probe into the deal, in which four automakers agreed on compromise tailpipe emissions requirements with California. The administration is also preparing to formally strip Californias authority to set auto efficiency regulations that are tougher than the federal governments, according to people familiar with the matter.The actions amount to a significant escalation of the conflict between the Trump administration and Sacramento over environmental protections. It comes as automakers have urged the administration to moderate its rollback of emissions levels, arguing that a battle with California over the states regulatory powers would leave the industry with uncertainty over the critical standards for years.Automakers want to avoid splitting the market with two different standards a federal mileage requirement in most states versus more stringent rules in more than a dozen states that adhere to Californias standards and account for more than a third of U.S. auto sales.After talks with California and the Trump administration faltered, the California Air Resources Board announced in July an accord with the Ford, Honda, BMW and Volkswagen on tailpipe greenhouse gas emissions regulations.The carmakers had agreed with Californias clean-air regulator to boost the fuel efficiency of autos sold in the U.S through 2026, defying a Trump administration proposal to ease mileage requirements enacted during the Obama administration.Ford and Honda said they would cooperate with the Justice Department, while VW said it was in regular contact with U.S. authorities on a number of matters. BMW of North America said it looked forward to responding to the Department of Justice to explain the planned CARB framework agreement and its benefits to consumers and the environment.In one of the letters seen by Bloomberg, the Justice Department wrote it was concerned that the California agreement may violate federal antitrust laws, noting that the department hadnt reached any conclusions on the matter. The department proposed a meeting to gather additional information about the emissions agreement and communications between the companies about the pact.In the letter sent to CARB on Friday, lawyers for the EPA and DOT said that Californias plans overstep the states authority by intruding on the federal governments power to set fuel economy and tailpipe emission standards.We recognize Californias disagreements with the federal governments policy proposals in this area, but those policy disagreements cannot justify CARBs pursuit of a regulatory approach that would violate federal law, they said.California officials insisted they wouldnt be cowed. California stands up to bullies and will keep fighting for stronger clean car protections that protect the health and safety of our children and families, Governor Gavin Newsom said in an emailed
Origin: Anti-trust probe opened into automakers that sided with California over Trump
Automakers
EPA balks at automakers’ fuel economy pact with California
A measuring hose for emissions inspections in diesel engines sticks in the exhaust tube of a Volkswagen Golf 2.0 TDI diesel car at a garage in Frankfurt an der Oder, eastern Germany, on October 1, 2015. Four major automakers reached a compromise with Californias clean-air regulator to boost fuel efficiency, a move the Trump administration dismissed as a PR stunt that wouldnt affect its plans to ease mileage requirements enacted during the Obama administration.The joint agreement with Honda, Ford, Volkswagen and BMW amounts to a rebuke of the Trump administrations 2018 proposal that recommended capping mileage requirements at a 37 mile-per-gallon fleet average starting in 2020, instead of eventually rising to 47 mpg.That plan also proposed stripping California of its authority to regulate carbon emissions from vehicle tailpipes.The compromise with California gives participating automakers some relief starting in model year 2022 by easing the pace of annual efficiency gains currently required under the California Air Resources Boards regulations on tailpipe greenhouse gas emissions, and extends the program by one year through 2026. Automakers will also receive additional compliance credits for selling electric vehicles under the plan, among other revisions, the states air pollution regulator said.The Trump administration is hell bent on rolling them back. They are in complete denialism about climate change, Californias Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom told reporters on a media call. Regardless of what the Trump administration determines in the next few weeks, we are moving forward and we reserve our right to litigate.California is in talks with additional automakers that are expected to join the pact as well, Mary Nichols, chairman of the states Air Resources Board, said on the call.In a joint statement, the automakers said the pact with California will provide our companies much-needed regulatory certainty by allowing us to meet both federal and state requirements with a single national fleet, avoiding a patchwork of regulations while continuing to ensure meaningful greenhouse gas emissions reductions.The pact comes as the Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are working to finalize their 2018 proposal after discussions with California officials broke down earlier this year.Todays announcement from CARB has no impact on EPAs regulation of greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act, Michael Abboud, an EPA spokesman, said in an email. This voluntary framework is a PR stunt that does nothing to further the one national standard that will provide certainty and relief for American consumers.In the statement, NHTSA said work continues on a final rule with which all companies must comply. Automakers for months have urged the Trump administration to moderate its rollback, fearing a lengthy legal battle over Californias regulatory powers would throw the critical standards into uncertainty for years. Those efforts have had little sway so far on the White House, which rejected a plea by 17 carmakers last month to work out a compromise with California.The companies also want to avoid a split market with federal mileage requirements in most states and more stringent rules in more than a dozen states that adhere to Californias standards. The states that follow California standards account for more than a third of all U.S. auto sales.General Motors, which did not sign the pact with California, said in a statement its focus remains on working with all parties on a solution that would involve a 50-state solution and a national electric vehicle
Origin: EPA balks at automakers’ fuel economy pact with California
Automakers question B.C.’s plan to phase out gas vehicles by 2040
A Hyundai Sonata Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV) at a charging station outletHyundai Big automakers are questioning B.C.’s proposed 2040 ban on the sale of new gas-powered cars, SUVs and light trucks. Japanese automaker Honda said it has been trying to tell the B.C. government that limiting new sales in 2040 to electric and hydrogen vehicles, while discounting gains in fuel-efficiency for future hybrid electric-gas engines, may not be the best way to achieve the province’s pollution reduction goals. “With the way technology is advancing it’s hard to predict, said Honda Canada president Dave Gardner. And that’s what we’re concerned about. At this stage of the game, let’s not pick a winning technology. Let’s just embrace anything that will achieve the overall goals. South Korean-based Hyundai, which is riding high on the successful launch of its new electric Kona SUV, said Ottawa should be regulating vehicle sales and not individual provinces like B.C. But Hyundai Canada president Don Romano also applauded B.C. for at least trying to push the issue. He said the province could become a leader if it mandated that existing gas stations – often owned by oil companies – also install electric and hydrogen fuel chargers, automatically creating a vast new charging network. I would cite to the B.C. government the fact they haven’t done anything with the gas industry, Romano said. If you want to see electric vehicles at 100 per cent at that time, or hydrogen vehicles, you need electric and hydrogen charging stations at every gas station across the province. It just makes sense. Energy Minister Michelle Mungall said B.C. is not considering such a move. Right now the private market is responding to building infrastructure associated with charging, and they are doing that at a fairly rapid pace, said Mungall. In terms of using the policy mechanism of government intervention, at this point I don’t know that that’s necessary. I haven’t even asked that question because the private sector is jumping in that quickly with charging stations. Mungall also said she believes B.C.’s legislation is flexible enough to accommodate Honda’s concerns. B.C.’s electric vehicle legislation is currently being debated in the legislature. In the first quarter of 2019, electric vehicle sales accounted for six per cent of B.C. vehicle sales. There are more than 17,000 zero-emission vehicles currently on B.C. roads. Plug-in hybrids, with batteries and gas engines, will still be allowed after 2040, but B.C. will award auto companies significantly reduced credits for selling them compared to fully electric models. Companies will need to accumulate enough credits to avoid being fined by the government. Hybrids without plug-in capability – currently more common in the marketplace – won’t be allowed for new sales in B.C. after 2040. Mungall said the proposed system rewards the cleanest vehicles with the longest range, and is the most flexible way to approach the issue. Honda Canada’s popular Civic sedan and CR-V SUV are both currently only available in gasoline models. Honda also sells a plug-in hybrid called the Clarity, which starts at $40,100. The next big thing you’ll see from Honda is to gasoline-electric, what you’d call a traditional hybrid engine, said Gardner. Because the traditional gasoline-electric hybrid can reduce or improve fuel economy from 20 to 25 per cent.” It’s not a position shared by Hyundai, which said plug-in hybrids still pollute. B.C. should stick with a zero-emission definition that is fully electric or hydrogen, said Romano. Ultimately, we need to remove combustion engines, he said. Hyundai’s electric Kona is the first electric subcompact SUV in Canada, with a starting price of $44,999. Hyundai says it has a travel range of 415 kilometres on a single charge, meaning it may only need to be charged once a week for some consumers. Kona EVs went on sale in January with 1,854 vehicles sold in February, then increased 197 per cent in March to 2,717 vehicles, and a further 53 per cent in April to 2,348 vehicles. Romano said government electric vehicle subsidies – $5,000 provincially and $5,000 federally – caused a run on demand and Hyundai is sold out of Konas. It’s an anomaly, he said. It doesn’t reflect the sustainable demand we’re going to see over the next couple of years. An EV electric vehicle charging parking spot in a parking lot at UBC, Vancouver, February 20 2019. Gerry Kahrmann / Postmedia Honda cited another trend that B.C.’s legislation fails to account for—mainly the consumer push away from fuel-efficient sedans toward larger SUVs and light trucks, where electrification is more difficult. Passenger cars are now accounting for less than 30 per cent of the marketplace, and we’re not motivating or trying to change the consumers who want bigger more utility vehicles and therefore by their nature are less fuel efficient, said Gardner. Hyundai disagreed, saying its Kona is proof that electric SUVs are possible and
Origin: Automakers question B.C.’s plan to phase out gas vehicles by 2040