Bristol City Council approves first UK ban for diesel cars

Bristol City Council has approved plans for Britain’s first no-diesel zone in the city centre as part of a drive to improve air quality in the area. The so-called Clean Air Zone, to be implemented in 2021, has been devised as a means of delivering “the fastest possible improvement in air quality against targets for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) legal limits”, according to the council.  The measures will see privately-owned diesel vehicles banned from entering a designated section of the city centre between 7am and 3pm every day. A wider charging zone would be in constant operation for high-emission commercial vehicles, with vans and taxis facing a £9 fee and buses and taxis facing a £100 fee for entering it.  The announcement comes two years after Bristol City Council was ordered by the government to produce a plan for bringing the area’s NO2 levels to within legal limits. It has been suggested that the Clean Air Zone could help to achieve this by 2025.  The proposal still needs government approval, however. Bristol Mayor Marvin Rees said: “These ambitious plans demonstrate our commitment to tackling air pollution so we meet legal limits within the shortest time, without disproportionally affecting citizens on lower incomes, which would happen with a blanket approach to charging vehicles. “Protecting the most vulnerable people from pollution is central to these plans and we have ensured that all impacts have been carefully considered. If approved, mitigation measures will support those most affected, especially those living in the most deprived communities.” Nicholas Lyes, head of policy at the RAC, said the planned restrictions could have an adverse affect on roads elsewhere: “Major routes into, out of, and even around the city – like Temple Way and Brunel Way – would become out of bounds, with diesel vehicles forced onto other roads, which risks causing congestion problems where they don’t exist at the moment.” He also called attention to the fact that “drivers of diesel cars who are locked into finance packages may face a significant penalty to exit their contract early”, and suggested that drivers of older vehicles could be forced into upgrading at significant cost.  SMMT boss Mike Hawes echoed the RAC’s concerns, adding that “this proposed blanket ban, which goes against government’s guidelines, fails to distinguish between modern vehicles and decades-old technologies and will only cause confusion for drivers while also undermining efforts to boost air quality”.  The predicted cost of implementation of the scheme totals £113.5 million, with comprehensive upgrades to the city’s ANPR network, road marking and signage necessary to its successful operation. The final business case is due to be submitted to government in February next
Origin: Bristol City Council approves first UK ban for diesel cars

Bristol City Council plots diesel vehicle ban

Bristol City Council is consulting on proposals to introduce the UK’s first no-diesel zone by 2021, as part of a drive to improve air quality in the area.  The so-called Clean Air Zone has been devised as a means of delivering “the fastest possible improvement in air quality against targets for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) legal limits”, according to the council.  If implemented, the measures would see privately-owned diesel vehicles banned from entering a designated section of the city centre between 7am and 3pm every day. A wider charging zone would be in constant operation for high-emission commercial vehicles, including buses, taxis, HGVs and LGVs, with suggested costs yet to be announced.  A diesel vehicle scrappage scheme would launch at the same time, to encourage Bristol drivers to swap into less polluting cars.  The announcement comes two years after Bristol City Council was ordered by the government to produce a plan for bringing the area’s NO2 levels to within legal limits. It has been suggested that the Clean Air Zone could help to achieve this by 2025.  Bristol Mayor Marvin Rees said: “These ambitious plans demonstrate our commitment to tackling air pollution so we meet legal limits within the shortest time, without disproportionally affecting citizens on lower incomes, which would happen with a blanket approach to charging vehicles. “Protecting the most vulnerable people from pollution is central to these plans and we have ensured that all impacts have been carefully considered. If approved, mitigation measures will support those most affected, especially those living in the most deprived communities.” The predicted cost of implementation of the scheme totals £113.5 million, with comprehensive upgrades to the city’s ANPR network, road marking and signage necessary to its successful operation.  The proposals will be fully detailed and debated at a meeting of Bristol City Council’s cabinet on 5 November. The final business case is due to be submitted to government in February next
Origin: Bristol City Council plots diesel vehicle ban

Edmonton council hotly debates lowering city speed limits

B.C.s capital city of Victoria has lowered its inner-city limit to 40 kilometres an hour from 50 km/h.Aaron Lynett Those holding the reins in E-Town are once again debating the merits of lowering speed limits on local, residential streets. Proponents of the change want to see a 40 km/h city-wide maximum on local and collector roads, with the exception of those same streets in core neighbourhoods, which would be slapped with a 30 km/h limit. Most streets currently have a 50 km/h limit. It was decided this week in council where, after an interminable debate, 10 of 13 councillors voted in favour of a blanket 40 km/h rule. Six councillors voted against the 30 km/h motion, some of whom were in favour of a single-tier limit as a starting point. Given timelines set forth by council, it’s likely the new limits should come into effect in January 2020, assuming it passes successfully through the Byzantine network of votes that is Edmonton city council. Supporters of the change are already celebrating. A citizen group promoting the hashtag #yegCoreZone on social media say these lower speed limits will increase livability in the city, especially in the core. If you’re wondering, that area is suggested to be roughly from 118th Avenue in the north to 61st Avenue and Argyll Road in the south; and from 142nd Street in the west to 75th Street to the east. Under the old rules, only playground areas are 30 km/h zones. WHOA! Great to read the good news while I’m away in Toronto. Congrats to #yegCoreZone citizens for your vision and hard work! pic.twitter.com/REs3WDiXpL Donna Fong (@FongPageNews) May 15, 2019 Elsewhere in the country, Ontario just approved an increase in speed limits, albeit ones on major highways where most drivers are zipping by at those velocities anyway. Our own Lorraine Sommerfeld mused on the subject a couple of days ago, doing a great job outlining decision factors and attempting to “unbundle the ball of knots” that make up the speed limit debate. Predictably, some readers went into nuclear orbit while others had a more measured response. Additional safety measures, especially in residential areas where children play, are noble efforts. Any parent worth their salt would accept a slightly slower drive if it meant little Johnny could ride his bike safely. It’s worth remembering, however, that speed limits are like glitter: once you’ve got ‘em, it’s unlikely you’ll get rid of
Origin: Edmonton council hotly debates lowering city speed limits