Civil case against VW’s diesel emissions scandal to start VW owners are seeking compensation for alleged fitting of emissions defeat devices Class action against Volkswagen will begin today (Monday 2nd December) in the UK, as lawyers representing more than 90,000 VW owners look to settle whether defeat device software fitted to 1.2 million vehicles was designed to illegally circumnavigate clean air laws. More than four years on from when the VW emissions scandal initially broke, VW customers in the UK are taking their case to the courts in the latest round of legal battles for the German manufacturer. The action is a civil suit, rather than a trial to determine any criminal undertakings. Other countries have already seen settlements paid by Volkswagen, with the scandal costing the company billions of pounds in legal damages. VW has paid more than $4 billion in penalties from criminal charges brought two years ago. Penalties in Australia have also been settled for customer compensation. In Europe, there has been no such closure, with cases due to come to court in the UK and a number of other countries. Here, VW claims that the emissions software used was not illegal – despite German authorities having previously ruled that it was. Volkswagen claims that no defeat devices have been installed in any vehicles in the UK, and that it will contest the action.
Origin: Civil case against VWs diesel emissions scandal to start
diesel
Trucks at SEMA 2019: Chevy’s electric vs Dodge’s diesel
Las Vegas, NEVADAMopar or Chevy? Diesel power or electric energy? Battery versus brawn? Old rivalries were made new again at the 2019 SEMA show in Las Vegas, as GM and FCA each breathed new life into a couple of their old trucks.Dedicated to the automotive aftermarket, the SEMA show is jammed with modified vehicles showing off new products. Some of the major automakers get in on the action, creating or commissioning their own builds for the show. This year, that included transforming two trucks a 1962 Chevy C-10 and 1968 Dodge D200.Both drew the crowds, but they were as different as they could be. The Chevy had a couple of electric motors under the hood, while the Dodge went old-school with a diesel. See how they stacked up and which do you prefer?1962 Chevrolet E-10 Chevy changed C-10 to E-10 for what the company dubbed its E-Crate motor, and its basically made by stacking electric motors together and with components from the Bolt electric compact car.The E-10 has a dual-stack system, and GM claims more than 450 horsepower and 470 lb.-ft. of torque at the wheels. Zero to 96 km/h is about five seconds, and the truck is estimated in the high 13-second range for the quarter-mile. But dont expect it to do it silently: theres an emulator on board that churns out the sound of V8 induction and exhaust.A custom truck is more than an engine, and the E-10 has an adjustable air suspension, 20- and 22-inch wheels, illuminated bowtie badges and a digital instrument cluster. The hood and tailgate have been smoothed out, the drip rails have been shaved, and the 62 grille has been replaced with one used in 1964. The E-10 isnt just for show. GM says the E-Crate is a concept but its also a fully-functional prototype that could one day be available to drop into anything that is currently set up for a Chevy LS engine currently (no pun intended) the engine of choice for most hot-rod and custom-car conversions.These next-generation electric motors can be stacked three-high for more than 1,000 horsepower. Right now the E-10s box is taken up with the battery, but the E-Crate can run on a range of 350 to 800 volts, so the battery can be sized for practicality or performance.Mopar Lowliner Concept The Lowliner also has a battery, but its just there to turn over the trucks 5.9-litre Cummins engine. The inline-six is considered legendary by diesel fans, and was first put into a Ram truck in 1989; the Ram brands current 6.7L diesel choice initially appeared in 2007.The 5.9L started with 12 valves but went to 24 valves in 1998, and its the 2-4 thats in this truck now. And heres the best part: the transmission has to be manually shifted through its six gears.The designers started with a 1968 Dodge D200 Sweptline heavy-duty Camper Special that they found in Ohio. They boxed the frame, and in addition to extending the wheelbase, pushed the front axle forward 76 millimetres. An adjustable air suspension on both axles gives it low, driving height, and driving height-plus positions.But while the trucks been lowered, the bed heights been raised by welding in the box floor from a new Ram 1500 and that was done to accommodate the air suspension and the fuel cell.Just about everything on the outside has been customized: the front end flips forward electrically, the handle-free doors open with electric poppers, the badges and chrome have been shaved off, the headlights and taillights are LED, the fuel fillers now mounted in the bed, and the Candied Delmonico red paint has the Mopar M subtly ghosted into the fenders.Take Our Poll The wheels are styled on the smoothie stamped-steel design that was popular in the 1960s, but while those were usually 15 inches, the Lowliner rides on 22s, with wide enough tires that the rear wheel wells have been widened. The interiors done in distressed-look leather, the shifter ball has a Cummins logo, and the original 1968 steering wheel is still in place.Unlike the E-10, which could potentially spin off a production aftermarket conversion, the Lowliner is all about the show. But we like em both, and really like that two old trucks that were already cool have been made even
Origin: Trucks at SEMA 2019: Chevy’s electric vs Dodge’s diesel
Bristol City Council approves first UK ban for diesel cars
Bristol City Council has approved plans for Britain’s first no-diesel zone in the city centre as part of a drive to improve air quality in the area. The so-called Clean Air Zone, to be implemented in 2021, has been devised as a means of delivering “the fastest possible improvement in air quality against targets for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) legal limits”, according to the council. The measures will see privately-owned diesel vehicles banned from entering a designated section of the city centre between 7am and 3pm every day. A wider charging zone would be in constant operation for high-emission commercial vehicles, with vans and taxis facing a £9 fee and buses and taxis facing a £100 fee for entering it. The announcement comes two years after Bristol City Council was ordered by the government to produce a plan for bringing the area’s NO2 levels to within legal limits. It has been suggested that the Clean Air Zone could help to achieve this by 2025. The proposal still needs government approval, however. Bristol Mayor Marvin Rees said: “These ambitious plans demonstrate our commitment to tackling air pollution so we meet legal limits within the shortest time, without disproportionally affecting citizens on lower incomes, which would happen with a blanket approach to charging vehicles. “Protecting the most vulnerable people from pollution is central to these plans and we have ensured that all impacts have been carefully considered. If approved, mitigation measures will support those most affected, especially those living in the most deprived communities.” Nicholas Lyes, head of policy at the RAC, said the planned restrictions could have an adverse affect on roads elsewhere: “Major routes into, out of, and even around the city – like Temple Way and Brunel Way – would become out of bounds, with diesel vehicles forced onto other roads, which risks causing congestion problems where they don’t exist at the moment.” He also called attention to the fact that “drivers of diesel cars who are locked into finance packages may face a significant penalty to exit their contract early”, and suggested that drivers of older vehicles could be forced into upgrading at significant cost. SMMT boss Mike Hawes echoed the RAC’s concerns, adding that “this proposed blanket ban, which goes against government’s guidelines, fails to distinguish between modern vehicles and decades-old technologies and will only cause confusion for drivers while also undermining efforts to boost air quality”. The predicted cost of implementation of the scheme totals £113.5 million, with comprehensive upgrades to the city’s ANPR network, road marking and signage necessary to its successful operation. The final business case is due to be submitted to government in February next
Origin: Bristol City Council approves first UK ban for diesel cars
Diesel ban for Bristol approved
Diesel ban for Bristol approved Plans to ban diesel cars from the city centre look to improve air quality Bristol will become the first city in the UK to ban diesel cars from its streets, to tackle illegal levels of air pollution. Bristol City Council voted for the plans to remove privately-owned diesel cars from the city centre between 7am and 3pm each day. The proposed scheme still needs government approval, but is set to start in 2021. Any diesel vehicles entering the zone within that time will incur a fine. Vehicles such as those used by the emergency services will be exempt from penalties, while commercial vehicles will have to pay to enter the area. In what is a wide-reaching zone, the areas impacted will include part of the M32, Redcliffe, the Harbourside, Spike Island, part of Hotwells, and the city centre, as well as the main hospitals in Bristol. The is also a Clean Air Zone proposed that would reach further out from the centre. Number plate recognition systems will be used to enforce the system, though details of how much fines are set to be are yet to be decided. Should the zone come into force in 2021, it is expected that air pollution levels will drop to compliant levels by 2025. Other cities have discussed implementing clean air zones banning the use of certain cars and London already has an Ultra Low Emission Zone in place, fining those cars that don’t reach certain Euro Missions standards. The Bristol plans look to be a blanket ban on all diesel vehicles, regardless of whether they meet the latest emissions regulations or not. There are arguments for and against the plans, with an improvement in air quality in the city centre largely undisputed. However, the blanket diesel ban – whilst allowing older, more polluting petrol vehicles in – has been suggested to be too simplistic, and a more sophisticated system would improve air quality sooner. NGC believes that the best way to improve air quality in urban areas is to move to electric vehicles, and it is hoped that the ban will add further impetus to those considering EVs in the region to make the transition.
Origin: Diesel ban for Bristol approved
Bristol City Council plots diesel vehicle ban
Bristol City Council is consulting on proposals to introduce the UK’s first no-diesel zone by 2021, as part of a drive to improve air quality in the area. The so-called Clean Air Zone has been devised as a means of delivering “the fastest possible improvement in air quality against targets for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) legal limits”, according to the council. If implemented, the measures would see privately-owned diesel vehicles banned from entering a designated section of the city centre between 7am and 3pm every day. A wider charging zone would be in constant operation for high-emission commercial vehicles, including buses, taxis, HGVs and LGVs, with suggested costs yet to be announced. A diesel vehicle scrappage scheme would launch at the same time, to encourage Bristol drivers to swap into less polluting cars. The announcement comes two years after Bristol City Council was ordered by the government to produce a plan for bringing the area’s NO2 levels to within legal limits. It has been suggested that the Clean Air Zone could help to achieve this by 2025. Bristol Mayor Marvin Rees said: “These ambitious plans demonstrate our commitment to tackling air pollution so we meet legal limits within the shortest time, without disproportionally affecting citizens on lower incomes, which would happen with a blanket approach to charging vehicles. “Protecting the most vulnerable people from pollution is central to these plans and we have ensured that all impacts have been carefully considered. If approved, mitigation measures will support those most affected, especially those living in the most deprived communities.” The predicted cost of implementation of the scheme totals £113.5 million, with comprehensive upgrades to the city’s ANPR network, road marking and signage necessary to its successful operation. The proposals will be fully detailed and debated at a meeting of Bristol City Council’s cabinet on 5 November. The final business case is due to be submitted to government in February next
Origin: Bristol City Council plots diesel vehicle ban
James Ruppert: Get pumped up for a mid-noughties diesel
I am always relieved to discover that it isn’t just me who reckons motor cars, for some of us anyway, are a bit too complicated for their own good. If your requirements are fairly modest and you want to spend money on a mortgage or food, then constantly upgrading to the latest model is not the best policy. Steve is like me and wasn’t at all sure what he should do with his lovely 2003 Audi A4 in Ming Blue with 160,000 miles when he had the offer of a friend’s 2008 Jaguar X-Type Tourer with 50,000 miles, a full service history and new clutch. Both cars are diesels. The issue was that Steve’s A4 has sickly air-con and fixing it is way more than the car is worth. But that is not necessarily the point. If a car is doing a job, then it’s often worth sticking with it. There is 160,000 on the clock of Steve’s A4, though, so maybe some bits are wearing out. More to the point, the X-Type he has been offered is in superb condition. So I told him he’s better off spending a bit more and going for the Jag. Anyway, let’s stick with this, as that era of diesels did not deserve to die and, more lately, be drowned in AdBlue. Steve, like many others, needs a car that can cope with lots of short city work and doesn’t have a silly diesel particulate filter (DPF). If you wanted a town runabout with 50mpg-plus potential and a very groovy on-trend boxy style that doesn’t cost £26,000 like one of those new-fangled Honda Es, what about a Lupo? These teeny Volkswagens came with a 1.4 engine and Pump Diesel technology. A 2002 one in tidy condition and with the Sport moniker starts at £595. More ambitious sellers try and get a more substantial £1500. It is tiny, though. Fun, but tiny. I’d be inclined to go for a VW Passat, but then again, what could be more exciting than an Alfa Romeo badge? So why not go for a pretty 156 JTD? The Sportwagon is not the biggest estate car in the world, so just regard it as a largish hatch. I came across a 2002 example with a solid 160,000 miles and lots of recent work, such as clutch and cambelt, for £1200. Then again, a Peugeot 406 is another wonderful blast from the past. A 2.0 HDi estate makes all sorts of sense and I found a 65,000-mile 2002 example. It was on offer for £1800. That was with a dealer. Provided you don’t want to go inside Ultra Low Emission Zones, there are still excellent reasons for looking back into the early 2000s for one of those rather excellent old-school diesels. Steve did. What we almost bought this week Dodge Ram 3500 5.7: Memories of a second-generation Ram 8.0 V10 sampled in 1998 are still vivid, but until one falls into our hands again, this more modest third-gen 5.7 double-cab of 2004 will do. It has done only 59,000 miles and the seller, a Dodge specialist, says it’s rust-free with an immaculate interior. He wants £8000 for it. Tales from Ruppert’s garage We got a letter in the post from Porsche. I believe it is recall number R/2019/204 and there are 11,745 vehicles affected by it. This recall was issued on 29 July 2019. Basically, it is all about the automatic gearbox because the selector lever cable plastic sleeve may break. The remedy is to replace it. All we have to do is book it in with our local dealer, who isn’t very local at all. So we are trying free up some time to do this. It takes around an hour and I am not sure if there is much to do there apart from test drive a Taycan. Reader’s ride Audi A4: Well, this is nice. Here’s Steve’s lovely A4 (see above) and he doesn’t like the direction modern diesel engines have been going in: “The world has gone backwards and produced an engine with little or no low-end torque and lots of DPF problems. “That’s why I bought a 2003 A4 PD TDI 1.9. The PD engine has solenoid-operated injectors running in oil. Even the cables run in oil. I also like the north-south layout of engine/transmission, which allows equal-length driveshafts and superb weight distribution.” Readers’ questions Question: My 2007-reg Focus ST has lost power. It’s making no unusual mechanical noises, but I’m sure I can hear it whistling. I’m worried it’ll cost a bomb to fix. James Davies, Exeter Answer: Don’t despair. It sounds like the oil diaphragm has failed, a common problem on early, second-generation STs. You can check by removing the dipstick. If the whistling stops, it’s the diaphragm. The good news is that you can fix it yourself since it’s fairly accessible. (You can see it below the top of the engine on the left-hand side. It’s covered by a round plastic cap.) Detach and move aside the airbox and trunking to access it. Pop off the cap and remove the diaphragm. A new one is £20. John Evans Question: Are RDE2 diesels on sale now or must buyers still pay more road tax and company car tax while car makers recover from the dash to WLTP? Steve Lynch, Burgess Hill Answer: Although this new, tougher version of the Real Driving Emissions test, which will run alongside WLTP, doesn’t come into
Origin: James Ruppert: Get pumped up for a mid-noughties diesel
Honda to remove diesel in Europe by 2021
Honda to remove diesel in Europe by 2021 Electric and hybrid models will replace diesels within the next few years Honda will phase out all diesel cars from its line-up by 2021, replacing them with electric and electrified powertrains. Reports from Reuters say that the Japanese firm is ditching diesel power as Honda moves to electrify all of its European models by 2025. Plans include pure-electric models – like the forthcoming Honda e – as well as plug-in hybrids and other electric vehicles. These will account for two-thirds of its car line-up by 2013, if all goes to plan, compared to a figure of less than 10% now. Declining demand for diesel power in Europe is a key reason behind the move, and Honda’s latest hybrid powertrain – launched on the CR-V – is expected to largely replace diesel options in the near future. Stricter emissions limits means the CR-V has already had a diesel option removed, and the Jazz only has a petrol engine in its line-up. The Civic and HR-V are currently the only models in the Honda range that have a diesel engine. The next-generation Jazz will be a hybrid-only model in Europe, having previously been confirmed as such by Honda, and the Honda e is due on sale early next year.
Origin: Honda to remove diesel in Europe by 2021
Hot diesel saloon showdown: Audi vs Alpina vs Mercedes
Diesel. Thought it was dead, didn’t you? And maybe it is. Sales have been down in the UK for the past 26 consecutive months and, anecdotally, more of the new cars arriving at Autocar road test headquarters now read 95RON on their filler caps; 98RON if we’re lucky. But try telling this to Audi. Audi spent millions (billions?) winning Le Mans time and again with smooth and bizarrely quiet TDI thrust, and now it’s fitting sophisticated diesel engines to its aspirational road cars. Models such as the S6 saloon and Avant, which only two generations ago used a normally aspirated 5.2-litre petrol V10 shared with Lamborghini. The S7 Sportback didn’t exist in the glory days of Audi’s supercar-engined but otherwise amusingly low-flying exec saloons, but it’s of the same ilk as the S6 and fundamentally they’re the same machine. It’s why the new S7 Sportback now also gets nothing more exotic, enticing or enthralling than a medium-sized V6 diesel. Madness or masterstroke? Anyone craving unleaded performance will soon have the option of the RS7 – which packs around 600bhp and is faster and firmer than ever before – so perhaps the S7 can thrive as a sub-sonic diesel express. And yet even if you ditch the exciting engines, Audi’s S moniker still needs to mean something to the person paying over £70,000 after options. Which is why today we’re putting the S7 up against Mercedes’ aristocratic CLS 400d 4Matic and the lesser-spotted but dynamically very well-sorted Alpina D5 S. These cars have different identities but a shared philosophy: namely, that in the real world, big diesel four-doors can be almost as quick and just as desirable as their pumped-up petrol counterparts, only more refined and much more economical. In terms of crucial ‘fitness for purpose’, their case is stronger more of the time than for the 600bhp car that flirts with single-digit fuel economy the moment you explore its potential. At £68,000, the S7 Sportback is by £6000 the most expensive car here, but it’s an otherwise cosy clique: six-cylinder engines, four-wheel drive, easily more than 300bhp and, in the case of all three, precisely 516lb ft served up ‘from the basement’, as one nameless Autocar tester once put it. The Audi uses a dual-clutch gearbox whereas the others have automatics, and it’s the only car here with rear-wheel steering, although that is an option on the Alpina. As you notice straight away in the metal, the Audi is also the longest, widest and lowest car here – marginally more so than the Mercedes, with the more conventionally proportioned BMW 5 Series-based Alpina a little way off either. But none stands out as a design marvel. The inoffensive CLS underplays its hand as a sophisticated ‘four-door coupé’ whereas the S7 Sportback chokes a good degree of its natural elegance with an enormous grille and odd details such as the halfhearted diffuser. Meanwhile, the D5 S sports Alpina’s usual aerodynamic fastenings and, unlike the Audi, its four exhaust tips are genuine. It looks the most serious, although you can nevertheless see why someone might go for the sleeker cars. Their level of presence marks them out as something unusual and quite special. We should now talk about the Audi’s new 3.0-litre V6 TDI. The block is ordinary in the sense that you’ll find it on regular models such as the A7 50 TDI but the pistons, conrods and crankshaft are all upgraded. There’s not only a variable-geometry turbocharger fed by exhaust gases but also an intake-side electric compressor that doesn’t require gas flow. It spools to 70,000rpm in an instant and, in theory, covers off the old-school turbocharger’s more laggy response. Beyond 1650rpm, it’s an ornament, being primarily designed to give sharp step-off and acceleration from low engine speeds, and can react so quickly because it’s driven by a 48V system whose lithium ion battery resides under the boot floor. That’s right. Never mind a big-capacity V10: the medium-rare Audi four-door of 2019 is a diesel mild hybrid. There’s also a battery alternator/starter connected to the crankshaft. It can scavenge electrical energy during deceleration and get the V6 going again after periods of engine-off coasting. Fit for purpose in the real world? Almost 35mpg combined and 344bhp suggest that’s very much the case. The first stint in this test takes us straight into an area where these cars need to excel: motorway driving. Refinement starts with comfort and here it’s difficult to look past the Mercedes, whose leather chairs have the sort of deep, low-set curvature that makes it feel by far the most GT-esque. The leather steering rim is wide, thin and firm – old-fashioned but good to hold. The Alpina is also supremely comfortable, feeling more materially rich than either of the others and with switchgear that’s simpler and more elegant. What you don’t get is the sensation that you’re sitting in a car with a particularly sporting persona, which, of course, you’re not. Alpina
Origin: Hot diesel saloon showdown: Audi vs Alpina vs Mercedes
First Drive: 2020 GMC Sierra 1500 Diesel
2020 GMC Sierra 1500 DieselDerek McNaughton / Driving JACKSON HOLE, Wyo. General Motors, after announcing last January it was bringing a diesel engine to its Sierra and Silverado light-duty pickups, delayed releasing power and torque figures for what seemed like forever. The reason? Its brand new 3.0-litre baby Duramax engine, developed specifically for the freshly redesigned pickups, had to compete with Ford’s new diesel in the F-150, as well as a looming update to the long-running EcoDiesel in the Ram.Ford had come out swinging with 440 lb.-ft., besting the Rams 420. Most figured GMs new 3.0L diesel would, at the very least, produce 450. But in March of this year, GM Authority revealed the secret: The 3.0L Duramax would come with an SAE-certified 277 horsepower and 460 lb.-ft. of torque, making the Sierra and Silverado the most powerful half ton diesels on the market. And for a few short months, GM proudly wore the crown.But competition and bragging rights in this category matter and RAM, never to be outdone raised the stakes by recently proclaiming its EcoDiesel would deliver 480 lb.-ft., although less overall horsepower than GMs pair of trucks. The torque war was suddenly on full display and GM lost its best-in-class status. But while GM may have lost the early numbers battle, it may have won the war simply through intelligent engine architecture: Instead of using a V6 for its diesel, GM chose a straight six a configuration long known for its inherently superior balance and buttery smooth delivery of power.That decision paid off. Touch the throttle on the 2020 Sierra equipped with the diesel and the reaction is quick, only the slightest pause as the Hydra-Matic 10-speed automatic transmission figures out where it needs to be before unleashing the engines full fury. Astonishing in force, the small diesel rockets the Sierra ahead with power that feels as strong and stout as GMs 6.2-litre V8. And, wow, is it ever smooth, with just enough feel through the cabin and steering wheel. Exceedingly quiet at idle, the engine delivers an almost BMW-like roar under full power, a hearty mix of turbocharger, high compression, and pistons all surging in perfect harmony. Engineers say they worked specifically on the intake sound, combining an air induction system with noise-reducing elements. Instead of blanketing the engine sound, GM has enhanced it. Yes, theres a bit of diesel clatter at throttle tip-in as would be expected and nearly impossible to eliminate, but in simple cruising theres just a low and deep and pleasing hum to the engine. Even though Ram has more torque, theres something about this engine that simply feels better behind the wheel, more satisfying when the foot hits the floor.No doubt some of that comes from an engine mount solenoid that basically acts as an adaptive shock absorber to control vibration and lower NVH levels. But some also comes from an aluminum cylinder head that caps an aluminum block (with iron cylinder liners for durability) to reduce mass over the front wheels. A variable-geometry turbocharger adjusts boost pressure according to demand, and air flow into the intake manifold is electronically controlled.An inline-six also has less moving parts than a traditional V6 two fewer camshafts and the chains to drive them, so theres no need for balancing shafts. Overall friction is less, too, all of which resulting in a clean, higher purity of power that begins to peak in this engine as early as 1,250 rpm and summiting at 1,500 rpm, sustaining itself through 3,000 rpm.Stepping on the gas returns some long legs of power, tapering off only after the truck blows past 110 km/h. Like a performance car, the Sierras power is constantly tempting and teasing the driver to explore its depths. Its almost too much seduction for a truck. If I were ordering a Sierra tomorrow, there is no doubt what engine Id choose, even if it does cost an extra $3,135 and is available on all trims (except the base truck) and only in double and crew cabs. Thats also because Im frugal, and would love to be able to travel more than 1,000 kilometres between fill-ups as the Sierra diesel should. Transport Canadas official rating for the 4WD diesel is 10.5 L/100 kilometres city, 9.1 highway and 9.9 combined. Two-wheel-drive trucks get an 83-litre fuel tank, while 4WD trucks get a 90.Mileage in the real world might skew lower, too, more toward the estimates on the Chevy Silverado which can be optioned with the same engine and returns 8.0 highway and 10.4 city on 4WD trucks. GM says the Sierra has more content and typically wears more aggressive tires that affect fuel economy. Based on the couple of hours we spent driving the Sierra on some mountainous roads, we achieved a low of 7.6 L/100 kilometres in some steady, 90 km/h driving, while the longer average on the trucks computer showed 11.2, though we had no idea how hard the truck was driven before our drive or how much it was idled.
Origin: First Drive: 2020 GMC Sierra 1500 Diesel
First Drive: 2020 GMC Sierra HD Diesel
2020 GMC Sierra HD DieselDerek McNaughton / Driving JACKSON HOLE, Wyo. Pulling a 13,000-pound Keystone Cougar trailer up and down mountain roads for a summer vacation is not going to be stress free nor is it something that can be typically done in a half-ton pickup, even if the maximum tow rating of said half-ton is 13,200 pounds. For massive loads like these, a heavy-duty truck is the only way to go.Ford, Ram and GMC all produce HD trucks, of course, but GMC has the newest HD on the market. The 2020 GMC Sierra 2500 HD diesel is not just a towing machine, its a leather-lined luxury cruiser that coddles its occupants in quiet and technology as much as it works to carry big things.Taller and longer than its predecessor, the 2020 Sierra HD looks especially good without being overwrought or too blingy the way other trucks sometimes tend to get, especially in the new AT4 trim, which looks perfect without all that chrome. Proportions on all the HD trucks are just about ideal, the bed made lower by one inch and three inches of legroom added to the crew cab, while the larger grille complements a functional hood scoop that feeds the cooling system for the Duramax diesel. New side steps on all box styles, located just behind the rear door, smartly pair with truly functional (and now deeper) rear-bumper steps. GMCs unique, six-way MultiPro tailgate is also available on all trim levels and standard on some, although its use is limited when a hitch is in the receiver.But the diesel is the real draw in the Sierra 2500. A 6.6-litre turbocharged V8 with cast iron block and aluminum heads, the diesel will deliver 910 lb.-ft. of torque as early as 1,600 rpm and 445 horsepower peaking at 2,800 rpm, meaning full power arrives early without having to wring out the engine for all its got. The diesel is actually more detectable by the badging on the front fender than it is at idle. Even under load, this engine is no noisier than a gasoline engine on the highway, although it is far more efficient. We were able to achieve an astonishing low of 8 L/100 kilometres in some very gentle 90 km/h driving with a 2,000-pound payload in the bed and no trailer, but averaged closer to 11 without trying to be thrifty. While towing the big Keystone through Wyoming, we dropped to an average of 25 L/100 kilometres. Good thing crew-cabs get a 136-litre tank, which would mean a little over 500 kilometres of travel when pulling a massive trailer through the mountains, or roughly 1,200 highway kilometres in regular use.The standard engine on the 2500 HD truck is a 6.6-litre gasoline V8 with 401 horsepower and 464 lb.-ft. of torque. Diesel adds an extra $11,195 to the base price of $46,998 for the regular cab, two-wheel-drive short box.And the diesel brings the power. Sure, going up some long uphill grades with that big trailer, the Sierra HD wouldnt much budge beyond 100 km/h even with a foot to the floor, but it had no difficulty maintaining a constant 90 uphill. Better was coming downhill and using diesel-exhaust braking, which can hold the trucks speed during a descent in combination with what should be a bulletproof 10-speed Allison automatic transmission the first-ever 10-speed in the HD segment, but expect to see a 10-speed in the competition soon.It certainly makes towing gentler, the transmission ironing out the shift points so perfectly they are almost not noticeable. I only wish there was a solution to the old-school column shifter, in an interior that doesnt exactly overwhelm with its sophistication. The primary center screen could easily be much larger, but at least theres a good compliment of knobs and buttons, and a proper restraint in using too many digital controls. Compared to the previous-generation truck, the 2020 Sierra HDs new architecture feels quieter overall and more tightly welded together. Brakes are smooth, the steering tight, the ride surprisingly comfortable given how tightly sprung the suspension is for the weight its meant to tow. Maximum conventional towing on the 2500 diesel is rated at 18,500 pounds in crew cab form, with a max payload of 3,597 pounds. With a gooseneck or fifth-wheel set up, the number is the same.As before, the HD trucks can be ordered in myriad bed and cab configurations in the 2500 and 3500 range, available with either a six-foot-nine or an eight-foot bed. Also available is a 15-inch head-up display, another first among HD trucks. The 2500 can also be optioned with GMs ProGrade trailering system that also includes an in-vehicle trailering app to check lights, trailer tire pressures, and even how much fresh water or wastewater is in the holding tanks of the trailer.An optional camera system can show up to 15 unique camera views including an industry-first transparent trailer view. Using the tailgate camera and a camera mounted on the rear of the trailer, software mixes the views of both cameras to make the trailer in back look invisible. That should help remove a
Origin: First Drive: 2020 GMC Sierra HD Diesel