Jim Mason, a forensic engineer with ARCCA, helped us access and download the contents of our cars infotainment computer.Geoffrey Fowler / Washington Post Behind the wheel, its nothing but you, the open road and your car quietly recording your every move.On a recent drive, a 2017 Chevrolet collected my precise location. It stored my phones ID and the people I called. It judged my acceleration and braking style, beaming back reports to its maker General Motors over an always-on Internet connection.Cars have become the most sophisticated computers many of us own, filled with hundreds of sensors. Even older models know an awful lot about you. Many copy over personal data as soon as you plug in a smartphone.But for the thousands you spend to buy a car, the data it produces doesnt belong to you. My Chevys dashboard didnt say what the car was recording. It wasnt in the owners manual. There was no way to download it.To glimpse my car data, I had to hack my way in.Spilling our Chevy Volt’s secretsJim Mason hacks into cars for a living, but usually just to better understand crashes and thefts. The Caltech-trained engineer works in Oakland, California, for a firm called ARCCA that helps reconstruct accidents. He agreed to help conduct a forensic analysis of my privacy.I chose a Chevrolet as our test subject because its maker GM has had the longest of any automaker to figure out data transparency. It began connecting cars with its OnStar service in 1996, initially to summon emergency assistance. Today, GM has more than 11 million 4G LTE data-equipped vehicles on the road. I found a volunteer, Doug, who let us peer inside his two-year-old Chevy Volt.Modern vehicles dont just have one computer. There are multiple, interconnected brains that can generate up to 25 gigabytes of data per hour from sensors all over the car. Even with Masons gear, we could only access some of these systems.This kind of hacking isnt a security risk for most of us it requires hours of physical access to a vehicle. Mason brought a laptop, special software, a box of circuit boards and dozens of sockets and screwdrivers. Buried behind the touch screen and radio controls sits our Chevrolet’s infotainment computer, a box identifiable here by a circle for its fan. Geoffrey Fowler / Washington Post We focused on the computer with the most accessible data: the infotainment system. You might think of it as the cars touch screen audio controls, yet many systems interact with it, from navigation to a synced-up smartphone. The only problem? This computer is buried beneath the dashboard. After an hour of prying and unscrewing, our Chevys interior looked like it had been lobotomized.(Dont try this at home. Seriously we had to take the car into a repair shop to get the infotainment computer reset.)It was worth the trouble when Mason showed me my data. There on a map was the precise location where Id driven to take apart the Chevy. There were my other destinations, such as the hardware store Id stopped at to buy some tape.Among the trove of data points were unique identifiers for my and Dougs phones, and a detailed log of phone calls from the previous week. There was a long list of contacts, right down to peoples address, emails and even photos.Infotainment systems can collect even more. Mason has hacked into Fords that record locations once every few minutes, even when you dont use the navigation system. Hes seen German cars with 300-gigabyte hard drives five times as much as a basic iPhone 11. The Tesla Model 3 can collect video snippets from the cars many cameras. Coming next: face data, used to personalize the vehicle and track driver attention.A privacy policy only a lawyer’s mother could loveMy volunteer car owner Doug asked GM to see the data it collected and shared. The automaker just pointed us to an obtuse privacy policy. Doug also (twice) sent GM a formal request under a 2003 California data law to ask who the company shared his information with. He got no reply.GM spokesman David Caldwell declined to offer specifics on Dougs Chevy, but said the data GM collects generally falls into three categories: vehicle location, vehicle performance and driver behavior. Much of this data is highly technical, not linkable to individuals and doesnt leave the vehicle itself, he said.The company, he said, collects real-time data to monitor vehicle performance to improve safety and to help design future products and services.But there were clues to what more GM knows on its website and app. It offers a Smart Driver score a measure of good driving based on how hard you brake and turn, and how often you drive late at night. Theyll share that with insurance companies, if you want. With paid OnStar service, I could, on demand, locate the cars exact location.The OnStar privacy policy, possibly only ever read by yours truly, grants the company rights to a broad set of personal and driving data without much detail on when and how often it might collect
Origin: What does your car know about you? We hacked a Chevy to find out
does
Emory does it again with the gorgeously resto-modified Outlaw 911K
Rod Emory has carved out a place for himself and his business in the world of Porsche by taking vintage 356s and bringing them into the modern era with mad style, grace and motorsport engineering. Now, with the Outlaw 911K, the Porsche experts at Emory Motorsports have completed their first project based on a Porsche 911. Commissioned by a special client, the project is based on a 1968 SWB 911 and inspired by the short-tailed Porsche 908-010 K-body prototype. It’s a new-age beauty with shades of retro stylings, which is classic Emory. But there’s a certain amount of playfulness here that not all the other Outlaws have. Features like the air horns mounted under the front, auxiliary lights, the Mobil Pegasus painted on the side, the 901 five-speed manual transmission or the cream-and-orange paint combo all bring a sense of fun to the custom build. Powering the 911K is a 2.5-litre twin-plug six-cylinder 911 engine that makes 190 horsepower with a modern ECU and a cooling fan from a 935. The car also got upgraded brakes with 911 S alloy calipers, a fully adjustable three-way KW shocks and Pirelli tires. Inside, there are 908-inspired seats with red covers and racing harnesses, a Prototipo steering wheel, an amber-coloured fibreglass dash cover and leather straps for the windows to round out the vintage rally feel.The Emory Outlaw 911K hasnt revealed the price the customer paid yet, so feel free to browse through the gallery of photos below and take a guess at the number of zeroes the tagll end
Origin: Emory does it again with the gorgeously resto-modified Outlaw 911K
Doing 147 km/h in a 50 zone—where does it end?
A speeding driver had his Cadillac impounded for street racing in Brampton July 2019.Peel Regional Police / Twitter “A driver has had his car seized after blasting through a construction site in Brampton at nearly three times the posted speed limit,” says a report from Toronto’s CityNews. In a change from the usual highway stunt charges we’re used to hearing about, this incident happened instead in a construction zone that was set to 50 km/h in a residential area. A 24-year-old man decided 147 km/h was a better speed to enter the zone. He had his licence suspended for seven days, and his newer Cadillac was impounded. Toronto and the GTA continue to be experiencing an increase in pedestrian and cyclist fatalities, despite efforts by local governments to introduce safety measures to counter them. They’re not working, and stories like this one are indicative of why: motorists are not buying into their responsibility on the issue. If ever-increasing fines aren’t stopping it, what will? Zoom Zoom = Ticket Ticket and Bye Bye car. This afternoon on Countryside Dr. #Brampton, in an active construction area a man decided to drive 147km/hr in a posted 50 zone. I don’t know about you but 🤯. #PRP pic.twitter.com/AY4GVsIY7P Peel Regional Police (@PeelPoliceMedia) June 11, 2019 Police have indicated in this case, the fine will be doubled, as it should be in a construction zone. A recent piece on driving.ca revealed that if drivers are distracted by something, even for a moment, as they enter a construction zone, those working have a twenty-nine-per-cent increased risk of being injured or killed. A construction zone in a residential neighbourhood. Three times the posted limit. Seven days without a licence doesn’t feel nearly harsh
Origin: Doing 147 km/h in a 50 zone—where does it end?
Hellcat-swapped Mazda Miata does massive smokey donuts
A YouTube channel gaining notoriety for building a Hellcat-swapped Mazda Miata has just released a video of the thing pulling off a massive smokey donut session during an event put on by Cleetus McFarland, another YouTube car builder. In the last video KARR posted about the project, it was not running, but the engine and transmission were installed, and the crew was buttoning up final details to make the car work. Obviously now the car is complete, and ready to do what it was built to do: kill tires. It should be sort of expected a car with over 700 horsepower can rip a massive smokey donut—after all, it only weighs as much as a cup of coffee. The 6.5-litre supercharged V8 engine came courtesy of a wrecked Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat, and the car is a standard NB Mazda Miata, just with most of the engine compartment hacked away to fit the massive motor. In this excessively long video, KARR takes the sports car to a dyno to test how much horsepower it really makes, but what they learned was that the car slides the tires on the dyno while in sixth gear, at 4,600 rpm. Yikes. It must take either big bollocks or a tiny brain to drive this thing, but either way, we’re happy somebody did it. By the way, the car made 460 horsepower and 569 lb.-ft. of torque at the
Origin: Hellcat-swapped Mazda Miata does massive smokey donuts
Disruptured: Just how well does Uber treat its ‘Partner’ drivers?
A man checks his smartphone while standing against an illuminated screen bearing the Uber logo in London on June 26, 2018.Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg Twenty-seven months ago, I wrote a comedy of errors about trying to become a licensed Uber driver in Toronto over the winter holidays. The conclusion of the piece was that Uber wasn’t a great deal for its drivers. Of course, Uber looking less than stellar may sound appropriate with your 2019 glasses on, but it was a different world in January 2017. Uber and Lyft (and Twitter, Facebook and Google) were still darlings of the business press, pop culture and Generation Techs. Over those twenty-seven months, Uber’s been busy shooting itself in the foot and a few fig leaves have withered. There’s the tech-bro issue: Uber’s been lambasted in the press for bullying and toxic masculinity in the office. (It’s hard to believe the #metoo movement only kicked in with the fall of Harvey Weinstein in October 2017. Wasn’t that a generation ago?) The resulting press was a litany of PR disasters. Small wonder Uber launched several safety features last month after a student in North Carolina was murdered in March after boarding what she thought was an Uber ride she’d hailed. It’s important to be seen doing something. There’s also the question of market leadership. Lyft got the jump on Uber, going public this same March 31, 2019. Lyft also beat them into the post-IPO slump, dropping 10%, on the poetically just a day after, April 1. This image provided by the Tempe Police Department shows an Uber SUV after hitting a woman on March 18, 2018 in Tempe, Ariz. The Associated Press Then there’s that whole killing and maiming people thing. One of Uber’s experimental self-driving cars killed a pedestrian in March 2018. In fact, Uber (and Lyft) drivers have injured and killed loads of pedestrians over the years. They didn’t talk about that much while heroically disrupturing reactionary oligopolies held by those evil taxi companies and converting the market to their own functional monopoly. A corporate travel fleet called Atchison listed reported incidents involving Uber and Lyft drivers. The egregious list read like a hip-hop hero’s rap sheet: deaths of pedestrians, cyclists and passengers; alleged assaults; untold dozens of alleged sexual assaults and harassments; five kidnappings; fifteen felons behind the wheel; sixteen DUIs and other nasty offences; and twenty cases of impostors posing as drivers. Compiling their list must’ve become tiring. Atchison stopped in July 2016, six months before I briefly joined the ranks of Uber drivers. Wait a second! Did that say Uber’s been experimenting with self-driving cars? They’re testing them right now, right here in Toronto! The Uber Advanced Technologies Group hopes to employ 100 researchers on self-driving technology this year alone in Toronto. Uber’s been on the self-driving vanguard for years. An entertaining Wired video from 2016 shows Uber testing the proto-versions of self-driving cars in Pittsburgh “with trained engineers at the wheel just in case.” However, the video cryptically continues, “Of course, if they do their job right, they won’t be needed forever.” Clearly the long-term plan is to get rid of those millions of ‘partners’ (aka independent and responsible for their own holidays, taxes, dentist bills, free water and newspapers for customers, etc.) many of whom have committed crimes. Meanwhile, suicide rates among taxi drivers in places like New York City are skyrocketing. City taxi licenses that recently cost millions are now virtually worthless. Thinking of driving an Uber yourself? Here’s what else to consider. Regulations vary by region. For instance, to drive an Uber in Toronto, you need to be 21+ years, possess a valid provincial driver’s license, legal work status in Canada, and have access to an eligible vehicle. The vehicle mustn’t be older than seven years. There’s also a background screening of your driving and criminal records. Insurance is paid by Uber but is only valid when you activate the app; you still need personal insurance. Be aware: Uber flatters its drivers that they’re independent business people. But Uber sets the rates and drivers cannot negotiate rates within the app. What about hours? The way the rating system and surge pricing work, drivers are continually nudged towards what is functionally shift work. Which sounds like what a low-powered employee does, not some independent tech business entrepreneur. Your boss is a weird amalgamation of an app and the passenger. Moreover, if you don’t play according to their rules, they cut you off. You need high acceptance and low cancellation rates to continue being connected to fares. On the other hand, you are assuming severe costs and risks, from overhead and gasoline to complex tax implications. Every mile you drive depreciates the value of your car. If you drive as your job, it depreciates fast and you‘ll have to replace the car every few years.
Origin: Disruptured: Just how well does Uber treat its ‘Partner’ drivers?