Graeme Fletcher behind the wheel of Audis A8 with Level 3 autonomy. If the autonomous driver fails, the car has a three-stage intervention process. The Internet is rife with examples of people’s misuse of Tesla’s Autopilot system, and for the most part, it’s pretty clear that it’s the humans who are the problem, and not the machines. But a pair of new studies performed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and funded by insurance companies suggest that your average driver’s knowledge about autonomous features is lacking. What’s more, some of the terms and names used by automakers may be adding to the confusion. “Current levels of automation could potentially improve safety,” said IIHS President David Harkey. “However, unless drivers have a certain amount of knowledge and comprehension, these new features also have the potential to create new risks.”One study tested how well people understand the messages communicated by autonomous system displays, while the other measured the impact of the names used by brands on driver comprehension. For the latter survey, over 2,000 drivers were asked a series of questions about a handful of Level 2 system names like Audi and Acura’s Traffic Jam Assist, Cadillac’s Super Cruise, Nissan’s ProPilot Assist, BMW’s Driving Assist Plus and Tesla’s Autopilot. Participants weren’t given the manufacturer, only the system name, and then asked to play a little game of Is It Safe? According to the study, 48 per cent of people polled thought it’d be safe to take their hands off the wheel while using Tesla’s Autopilot. It’s not. Only Cadillac’s Super Cruise, which uses eye-tracking tech to measure driver attentiveness, doesn’t require the driver’s hands to stay on the wheel. (Not that the whole ‘hands on the wheel’ thing has stopped Tesla drivers from doing all sorts of other things with their hands off the wheel—the system can be fooled.) Tesla’s system wasn’t the only that sparked confusion either. Thirty-three per cent of respondents thought it’d be cool to take their hands off the wheel with Nissan’s ProPilot Assist activated. For BMW’s Driving Assist Plus, that number was 27 per cent. Participants were also asked about talking on the phone, texting, watching a movie and taking a nap, all of which are obviously a no-go for any of the systems. Again, Tesla’s Autopilot was the most misunderstood, with 34 per cent claiming they’d take a call, 16 per cent willing to text, 8 per cent ready to watch a movie, and 6 per cent believing falling asleep behind the wheelwouldn’t be an issue so long as Autopilot was on. Naturally, Tesla defends its system and its name. “This survey is not representative of the perceptions of Tesla owners or people who have experience using Autopilot, and it would be inaccurate to suggest as much,” Tesla said in a statement. “If IIHS is opposed to the name ‘Autopilot,’ presumably they are equally opposed to the name
Origin: Drivers don’t understand the limits of today’s semi-automated vehicles: studies
Drivers
Caddy says new V-Series’ horsepower is lower because drivers were ‘intimidated’
The 2020 Cadillac CT5-VGraeme Fletcher / Driving.ca As we recently covered, the new 2020 CT4-V and CT5-V have arrived with upgrades across the board, except for in the power department. That’s down, but why? According to statements made by GM president Mark Reuss and reported by Automotive News, people were scared of the gobs of horsepower in the last V-Series, so the company is pulling back a bit for this new generation to make them more appealing. There was, frankly, some people who were intimidated by the cars, Reuss said following the unveiling of the cars last week. When we did a V-Series, they were hammers. There’s some intimidation there. Those “hammers” included the CTS-V, which claimed 640 horsepower from its supercharged V8 and topped out at over 320 km/h; and the ATS-V, whose twin-turbo V6 made 464 horsepower and could push the car to 304 km/h. In contrast, the new V-Series CT4-V makes 320 horsepower from its turbocharged four-cylinder, while the CT5-V gets 355 from its turbo-six. So, yeah, they’re less intimidating now, perhaps hinting at a detuned CT6-V on the way, too (its 550 horsepower will no doubt be too scary for drivers, as well). Meanwhile, Cadillac has been testing a pair of track-ready V-Series prototypes that Reuss says “represent the next step in Cadillac’s V-Series performance legacy.” It’s expected the track-approved CT4-V will house a 3.0-litre twin-turbo V6 with 400-plus horsepower, and the matching CT5-V either a twin-turbo 4.2-litre V8 with 500-plus horsepower or the same 640-horsepower supercharged V8 that currently powers the CTS-V. Pricing for the now-less-intimidating V-Series cars hasn’t been announced, but Caddy says they’ll be the most accessible to date.
Origin: Caddy says new V-Series’ horsepower is lower because drivers were ‘intimidated’
Most Subaru BRZ drivers prefer manual while Toyota 86 drivers go automatic
Last week Toyota told the world just how many of its drivers were champing at the bit to drive a car with a manual transmission. It wasn’t many. Just one per cent of Corolla drivers opted for the stick shift in 2018, while around 33 per cent of the far-sportier 86’s buyers preferred the manual. Following the news, Autoblog recognized the opportunity to perform a twin study and asked Subaru for the BRZ’s manual uptake numbers. Hypothesis: It’s basically the same car, so it should have the same appeal as a manual. Conclusion: Nope. Compared to the previously reported one-third of Toyota 86 models ordered with a stick, buyers of the Subaru BRZ preferred the manual transmission 78 per cent of the time in 2018. Regarding the ‘nature vs. nurture’ debate in this particular twin study, nurture dominates. There must be something about Subaru branding that appeals to the part of the enthusiast crowd that prefers to have busy hands. For context, the Mazda MX-5 Miata soft top has a manual take rate of 76 per cent, and that’s a car that basically shouldn’t even be offered with an automatic. The Subaru WRX also had an impressive stat in this column, with 90 per cent of buyers ordering the manual. That’s weighted, no doubt, by the fact that the WRX STI is sold exclusively as a manual. But before you go declaring Subaru the Queen of the Manual, know that the automatic is still vastly preferred within the brand’s less-sporty models. The Subaru Impreza sells with a stick 8 per cent of the time, followed by the Crosstrek at 6 per cent and the Forester at 3 per cent.
Origin: Most Subaru BRZ drivers prefer manual while Toyota 86 drivers go automatic
Uber’s luxury clientele can now request silence from drivers in-app
Jesse Vega checks a vehicle at the first of Ubers Work On Demand recruitment events where they hope to sign 12,000 new driver-partners, in South Los Angeles on March 10, 2016.Mark Ralston Ever climbed into an Uber only to immediately wish you could flip a switch and put your overly chatty driver on mute? With the app’s latest update, you kind of can. This week, Uber announced new features to its rideshare platform, specifically for those booking Uber Black rides, the app’s luxury experience that offers trips in high-end vehicles. Most notably, the “enhanced” experience includes an option called Quiet Mode where users can can request the driver remain silent during the trip. Quiet Mode, available now for users booking trips on Uber Black, includes three options: “quiet preferred,” “happy to chat” or “no preference.” Uber Black is, on average, 100 times more expensive than UberX, and 200 times more expensive than Uber Pool. It sounds like this could be a welcomed feature, not only for busy professionals looking to take a business call or have a moment of silence, but also for anyone whose skin crawls at the thought of making awkward small talk. Or worse: becoming a therapist for a disenchanted driver. The concept is sort of like a digital version of the quiet floors that GO Transit implemented on its commuter trains in the Toronto area a few years back. Still, Uber isn’t known for making the best HR moves, and some outlets are accusing the ride share app of “dehumanizing” its drivers. With this new update, Uber Black users will also be able to request the driver adjust the temperature or notify the driver if they have luggage that needs to be loaded into the vehicle. All of these preferences need to be selected before you book the fare, not while the vehicle is in transit or while you’re on a ride. Is this a smart business play or just plain rude? Tell us in the comments. Or keep your silence, that’s cool, too.
Origin: Uber’s luxury clientele can now request silence from drivers in-app
Eliminating mailed-out reminders is hitting some Newfoundland drivers in the wallet
A wall of American licence plates in a Maine bar.Dixipix / Deposit Photo A cost-saving measure enacted in 2018 in Newfoundland and Labrador is taking its toll on residents’ pocketbooks. As part of last year’s provincial budget, the government of Newfoundland decided to eliminate the practice of mailing out written notices for vehicle license renewals and switch to e-mailing them instead, saying the cut would save the province about half a million dollars per year. At the time, opponents of the change said it would cause a spike in people running around with invalid plates. Turns out they were right. From the months of July to December, a total of 1,509 people were convicted of driving with expired registration stickers, an increase of about 300 more than the average for the same time period over the previous four years. This means, of course, that the gubbmint is making money on two fronts: the initial savings from stopping the notifications; plus the funds collected from the extra convictions, at $250 a pop. Using those numbers, basic math teaches us the lapsed tags lined government coffers with an additional $75,000 or so. While it’s true that drivers are indeed responsible for the condition (and legality) of their vehicles, not everyone is in tune with the status of the stickers on their car’s license plates as you or I. After all, for many, it’s just one more bill to pay, on par with condo fees or the electric bill. The problem is compounded in this author’s home province of Newfoundland, where many communities rely on internet services with speeds not much higher than dial-up, if they have any access to internet at all. E-mailed reminders may not reach all of their intended recipients. Another quirk of the Newfoundland vehicle registry is that license plates are tied to the vehicle, not the person. With a few exceptions, a driver cannot move their tin tag from one car to another. The takeaway from all this, of course, is that one should pay attention to the expiration date of their car’s registration. Stay alert,
Origin: Eliminating mailed-out reminders is hitting some Newfoundland drivers in the wallet
Disruptured: Just how well does Uber treat its ‘Partner’ drivers?
A man checks his smartphone while standing against an illuminated screen bearing the Uber logo in London on June 26, 2018.Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg Twenty-seven months ago, I wrote a comedy of errors about trying to become a licensed Uber driver in Toronto over the winter holidays. The conclusion of the piece was that Uber wasn’t a great deal for its drivers. Of course, Uber looking less than stellar may sound appropriate with your 2019 glasses on, but it was a different world in January 2017. Uber and Lyft (and Twitter, Facebook and Google) were still darlings of the business press, pop culture and Generation Techs. Over those twenty-seven months, Uber’s been busy shooting itself in the foot and a few fig leaves have withered. There’s the tech-bro issue: Uber’s been lambasted in the press for bullying and toxic masculinity in the office. (It’s hard to believe the #metoo movement only kicked in with the fall of Harvey Weinstein in October 2017. Wasn’t that a generation ago?) The resulting press was a litany of PR disasters. Small wonder Uber launched several safety features last month after a student in North Carolina was murdered in March after boarding what she thought was an Uber ride she’d hailed. It’s important to be seen doing something. There’s also the question of market leadership. Lyft got the jump on Uber, going public this same March 31, 2019. Lyft also beat them into the post-IPO slump, dropping 10%, on the poetically just a day after, April 1. This image provided by the Tempe Police Department shows an Uber SUV after hitting a woman on March 18, 2018 in Tempe, Ariz. The Associated Press Then there’s that whole killing and maiming people thing. One of Uber’s experimental self-driving cars killed a pedestrian in March 2018. In fact, Uber (and Lyft) drivers have injured and killed loads of pedestrians over the years. They didn’t talk about that much while heroically disrupturing reactionary oligopolies held by those evil taxi companies and converting the market to their own functional monopoly. A corporate travel fleet called Atchison listed reported incidents involving Uber and Lyft drivers. The egregious list read like a hip-hop hero’s rap sheet: deaths of pedestrians, cyclists and passengers; alleged assaults; untold dozens of alleged sexual assaults and harassments; five kidnappings; fifteen felons behind the wheel; sixteen DUIs and other nasty offences; and twenty cases of impostors posing as drivers. Compiling their list must’ve become tiring. Atchison stopped in July 2016, six months before I briefly joined the ranks of Uber drivers. Wait a second! Did that say Uber’s been experimenting with self-driving cars? They’re testing them right now, right here in Toronto! The Uber Advanced Technologies Group hopes to employ 100 researchers on self-driving technology this year alone in Toronto. Uber’s been on the self-driving vanguard for years. An entertaining Wired video from 2016 shows Uber testing the proto-versions of self-driving cars in Pittsburgh “with trained engineers at the wheel just in case.” However, the video cryptically continues, “Of course, if they do their job right, they won’t be needed forever.” Clearly the long-term plan is to get rid of those millions of ‘partners’ (aka independent and responsible for their own holidays, taxes, dentist bills, free water and newspapers for customers, etc.) many of whom have committed crimes. Meanwhile, suicide rates among taxi drivers in places like New York City are skyrocketing. City taxi licenses that recently cost millions are now virtually worthless. Thinking of driving an Uber yourself? Here’s what else to consider. Regulations vary by region. For instance, to drive an Uber in Toronto, you need to be 21+ years, possess a valid provincial driver’s license, legal work status in Canada, and have access to an eligible vehicle. The vehicle mustn’t be older than seven years. There’s also a background screening of your driving and criminal records. Insurance is paid by Uber but is only valid when you activate the app; you still need personal insurance. Be aware: Uber flatters its drivers that they’re independent business people. But Uber sets the rates and drivers cannot negotiate rates within the app. What about hours? The way the rating system and surge pricing work, drivers are continually nudged towards what is functionally shift work. Which sounds like what a low-powered employee does, not some independent tech business entrepreneur. Your boss is a weird amalgamation of an app and the passenger. Moreover, if you don’t play according to their rules, they cut you off. You need high acceptance and low cancellation rates to continue being connected to fares. On the other hand, you are assuming severe costs and risks, from overhead and gasoline to complex tax implications. Every mile you drive depreciates the value of your car. If you drive as your job, it depreciates fast and you‘ll have to replace the car every few years.
Origin: Disruptured: Just how well does Uber treat its ‘Partner’ drivers?
Drivers in Alberta saw the steepest hike in auto insurance rates
The upcoming hard market for insurance wont be easy on your wallet.Susan Gamble / Sun Media Of all the provinces in Canada, Alberta drivers saw the steepest rise in their auto insurance over the last year, with Ontario and Atlantic Canada not far behind. In the first three months of 2019, rates have climbed 11.2 per cent in Alberta, while they’re up 9.0 per cent in Ontario, and 6.5 per cent in Atlantic Canada, according to online insurance comparison site LowestRates.ca. The site released its Q1 (first quarter) 2019 Auto Insurance Price Index, which tracks the average cost of car insurance each quarter. The site said that the price rise was further aggravated in Alberta and Ontario by the announcements that Esurance and AIG Insurance will leave Canada, and that other companies have said that price caps in those provinces have led to them paying out more in claims than they received in premiums in some instances. In Atlantic Canada, the highest prices are in Newfoundland and Labrador, which the Insurance Bureau of Canada says is due to a lack of limits on minor injury claim amounts, while the other provinces have capped the maximum payout. The report broke down insurance costs for men and women in the first quarter of 2019, when compared to the last quarter of 2018. In Ontario, men paid 9.4 per cent more, while women paid 6.3 per cent more. In Alberta, the rise was 4.7 per cent for men and 2.1 per cent for women; and in Atlantic Canada, rates climbed 0.7 per cent for men and 4.1 per cent for women. Some rate hikes were even higher when compared to the first quarter of 2018, with drivers in all three areas hit with increases as high as 11.6 per cent. The site reports that prices are now in at the highest levels in most markets since it began tracking prices in 2016, even though governments are trying to enact laws that will lower insurance costs for
Origin: Drivers in Alberta saw the steepest hike in auto insurance rates