1966 Ford Bronco ICON DerelictIcon Tom Petty once sang that waiting is the hardest part. Hes exactly right especially when it comes to the new Ford Bronco.It seems like an eternity since the company announced the trucks return in Detroit nearly three years ago. Since then, weve been kept alive with the dribs and drabs of teasers and leaks.The latest leak comes courtesy of the sharp eyes at AutoGuide, who have found patent drawings which seemingly confirm rumours the new Bronco will have removable doors in addition to a removable top. These drawings depict a squared-off SUV with, to put it mildly, a free-flow interior.Binning the doors on command would be a great feature, one that until now was reserved for owners of Jeep Wranglers and Gladiators. Nothing is certain, of course, especially since car companies frequently patent ideas and never use them for any number of reasons. But even the possibility of a door-less Bronco gets us jonesing to visit a Blue Oval dealer post-haste.Also buried in these patent drawings is a nifty method of providing side protection for occupants. It seems that the company is developing some sort of remote inflator, one which could be permanently fixed in the door pillar but fire its charge some distance to inflate a bag located inside a set of rugged tubular doors.The filings suggest this could be accomplished by way of a stout-but-telescopic bar equipped with strategically placed holes. As for the rest of this new Ford, well have to wait like everyone else. Your author found a listing at Canadian Tire, of all places, suggesting the 2021 Bronco will have a 2.3-litre four-banger under its hood, a mill which likely shares much with that found in the Ranger.This man is also willing to bet money a removable roof, or at least removable roof panels, will be in the offing on Bronco, along with off-road kit from the Ranger
Origin: More patents further hint new Ford Bronco could have removable doors
further?
Jaguar Land Rover owner open to further partnerships
The head of Jaguar Land Rover’s parent company is open to the British firm seeking further partnerships with other car makers – saying it is the “only way” to fund the necessary investment in future technologies. Jaguar Land Rover has suffered heavy losses in recent months due to falling sales, which have also hit the profits of its Indian parent firm Tata Motors. But JLR is facing the need to invest in electric powertrains, autonomous systems and mobility services for the future. Jaguar Land Rover has agreed a partnership with the BMW Group to jointly develop electrified powertrain components. Autocar has learned that partnership is set to expand to include engine sharing – and, as revealed in this week’s magazine, could lead to select JLR models being built on BMW Group platforms in the future. Speaking at Tata Motors’ AGM, chairman Natarajan Chandrasekaran said that he was open to more partnerships in the future. “Like any other auto company, JLR has to invest in future technologies to address the move away from (internal combustion engines) to hybrid and electric,” he said. “It also has to invest in future models, make necessary investments in areas like shared mobility, and also beyond that. That’s very important to stay alive in this ecosystem. “All this means is there is a need for capital investment if you want to be future-ready. The only way to handle this need for (capital investment) is additional investment through partnerships, because we want to spread the investment. There are many discussions underway, from tactical to strategic.” Asked about future partnership opportunities, Chandrasekaran added: “These opportunities keep coming and we keep evaluating every one of these opportunities and as long as it is in the interest of Tata Motors, we will forge such partnerships so that we are able to address the capex.” Tata was recently reported to be in talks to sell Jaguar Land Rover to the French PSA Group, which it denied at the
Origin: Jaguar Land Rover owner open to further partnerships
Aston Martin shares slide further after 2019 loss posted
Aston Martin’s share price has taken another hit after the firm announced a pre-tax loss of £78.8 million in the first half of this year. The price is now below £5 a share for the first time, hitting a low of £4.40 as trading opened this morning before rebounding to £4.88 after Aston held a press conference. The losses were blamed on lower-than-expected sales in Europe and expansion costs – but company boss Andy Palmer insists the firm’s ambitious growth plan remains on track. The publication of Aston Martin Lagonda’s latest results came a week after the firm issued a profit warning in which it cut its wholesale forecasts. That first caused shares in the company to dive to less than £6 per share, compared to £19 when the firm first floated in October 2018. Aston’s retails sales in the first half of 2019 were up 26% year-on-year, with growth in the USA and China off-setting a steep decline in the UK and Europe. Wholesale volumes – cars being distributed to dealers – were up 6% year-on-year. Aston boss Palmer admitted that “this has been a difficult period and we’ve clearly seen the market reaction”. But he noted that the firm’s sales were up year-on-year, and added: “I’m confident we are taking the right actions and that we can successfully deliver our strategy.” While sales were up, driven largely by demand for the Vantage and DBS Superleggera, Aston’s revenues dipped in part because it sold fewer high-price Special models, reducing the average selling price of its cars. The firm anticipates sales of its Specials will increase later this year, particularly with the ultra-limited run DB4 GT Zagato Continuation due in the fourth quarter. In its profit warning last week, Aston Martin revised planned wholesale volumes for the full year. From 7100 to 7300 units originally forecast when it published its annual results in February, the target has now dropped to 6300 to 6500 units. Palmer said that reduction was a result of the firm being “responsible and disciplined in the approach to our balance sheet”, and was designed to ensure that supply of the firm’s cars did not exceed demand, which could force dealers to offer discounts. He added: “Retails are up, wholesales are up, market share is up – we’re just not as up in wholesale as we’d like. In order to protect the market position of the brand we thought it right and proper to cut the wholesale (numbers) to ensure that we don’t simply make the mistakes of history and have to discount cars to get them away.” Aston’s profits were hit by a one-off £19 million provision for a ‘doubtful debt’ charge, relating to the planned sale of some intellectual property rights in the previous year. The firm has also invested heavily in its ambitious Second Century growth plan, and particularly in developing the DBX SUV, which is due to be launched in December and go on sale early next year. Palmer said that Aston remained “focused completely” on the execution of the plan, and insisted that the wholesale volume revisions and falling share price wouldn’t impact that. “We recognise there are headwinds and continuing uncertainties, and you’d correctly expect us to keep our financing arrangements under review to ensure we have appropriate resources around us,” said Palmer. He noted the first has greater cash reserves than it did this time last year, and would be prepared to secure additional funding “from sources with which we’re familiar” if needed. He added: “Our basic intention is the execution of the (Second Century) plan. We have some short-term headwinds and one would hope we move through this short-term correction and then carry on with what we’re doing. “You always take opportunities to be leaner and fitter, and that we will do. We’ve seen through the development of DBX so far that the efficiency of the development is much greater than it was with DB11, (with) far fewer design changes, far fewer needs to correct things not modelled correctly. “That efficiency and things we learn through development are then cascased into (development of the) Vanquish replacement and eventually the Lagondas. We’ll take the opportunity of those learnings, but the plan remains
Origin: Aston Martin shares slide further after 2019 loss posted
Could Alberta drive B.C. gas prices up even further?
A tanker tractor-trailer semi truck driving down a rainy road.Fotolia Drivers in Canada’s westernmost province have historically paid more at the pumps for gasoline than their Alberta neighbours. A combination of demand and taxation, amongst other reasons, conspire to hose British Columbia’s drivers with fuel prices generally much higher than the rest of the country. It doesn’t help the Lower Mainland used to have four refineries but shuttered three of them over twenty years ago, but that is a topic for another day. With a new premier in the Alberta driver’s seat, the energy-rich province has sparked a war of words with its west coast neighbour. By enacting Bill 12 into law, premier Kenney has thrown down the gasoline gauntlet. If you have been living under an especially virulent rock, know that Bill 12 gives Alberta the ability to restrict the export of crude oil, natural gas and refined fuels, if necessary. It was actually passed by the previous NDP government, who intended to hang onto it and only enact it into law if needed. A bit of background on how fuel makes its way into British Columbia might be helpful. With a dearth of refineries, the province relies on a series of import systems to quench its thirst for the almighty go-juice. It is estimated Alberta supplies well over two-thirds of the gasoline and diesel used in B.C., liquid gold that is sent west via trucks and a pipeline. With the latter full to capacity, B.C. needs to ship in more gas via trucks and barges, both of which are eye-wateringly expensive ways to move fuel. It’s clear, then, why some think the threat of tightening the taps in Alberta should scare the bejeebers out of folks in British Columbia. With gas prices rapidly approaching $2.00/litre, they may have a point. But there’s a problem. Lawmakers in B.C. have filed a constitutional challenge to Bill 12, arguing it contravenes the Constitution Act, 1867, which allows for the free flow of goods throughout the provinces. The new bill would give the provincial government authority to require companies to obtain a licence before exporting energy products from Alberta via pipeline, rail or truck. Those export licences would be required for every company if the energy minister determines it’s in the public interest to ensure adequate pipeline capacity is available to maximize the return on resources and supply is maintained for Alberta’s needs, now and into the future. It’s likely that latter stipulation that has rankled the crew in B.C. We won’t have long to wait: an initial hearing on the issue is set for May 7 in
Origin: Could Alberta drive B.C. gas prices up even further?