Analysis: why Vauxhall’s Luton plant has a bright future

Britain’s biggest commercial vehicle plant, Vauxhall Luton, last month started production of a new Vivaro van as part of a £100 million investment under new PSA ownership that secures 1250 jobs.  The new van provides Luton with long-term security, gives a huge vote of confidence in the plant’s ability to adopt PSA manufacturing and quality standards and potentially opens up opportunities to build other vehicles based on the PSA EMP2 platform, which also underpins the Vauxhall Grandland X.  “This is a very, very important investment for Vauxhall,” said plant director Mike Wright. “In less than two years, the workforce has turned this plant into one of PSA’s ‘European champions’. The amount of change at the plant has just been huge.”  Such accolades are particularly crucial when you consider how under threat Vauxhall’s other major plant – Ellesmere Port – has appeared to be in recent months.  Five years ago, Wright guided Autocar through a tranche of £168m of investment that put the revamped Gen-3 Vivaro into production under GM ownership in conjunction with Opel and Renault, securing the Luton plant to 2025.  Now it’s all change after PSA bought Vauxhall/Opel in March 2017, with the Vivaro name switching to the design that serves as the Citroën Jumpy/ Dispatch, Peugeot Expert and Toyota ProAce Verso.  Like the outgoing Vivaro, it’s front-driven, but, being based on a platform that also supports SUVs, has refinements such as a multi-link rear axle, a more complex electrical system and a panoramic roof option for passenger versions.  Switching to the new platform has required significant changes to the Luton plant layout. The bulk of the investment – £65m – has gone into a new, heavily robotised body-in-white assembly plant for the new platform.  To accommodate the new line, Vauxhall cleared out a cavernous 8000-square-feet underground car park and installed 300 new robots plus assembly jigs and mechanical handling gear capable of pushing out 24 chassis platform underbodies every hour. “With a lot of blood, sweat and tears, we’ve transformed this space and installed and commissioned a whole new chassis line in just 12 months,” said Wright.  This might just be a record for a new assembly plant body shop, the urgency of PSA to speed up the turnaround providing the impetus.  Such speed of delivery is possible since the line at Vauxhall replicates the one installed at Sevel Nord, PSA’s van plant at Valenciennes in northern France.  Luton is now part of PSA’s ‘van cluster’, led by Sevel Nord, and featuring Luton, Sevel Sud in Italy and Gliwice in Poland. Quality is benchmarked against Nord and, on our visit, Citroën and Peugeot vans are in production as a quality yardstick.  Operations at Luton have been simplified by bringing in kits of pressed body panels from Sevel Nord’s suppliers, although this has diluted local content to 22% – below the 40% that it was under GM. Vauxhall hopes to raise the local content in future.  With panels coming in from France, Luton’s ageing press shop is quiet for now. The speed of the model changeover at Luton allows insufficient time to build new body dies, which typically takes two years.  Previously, the press shop was fully occupied stamping out panels both for Luton and Renault’s Normandy van plant. Replacement work might include panels for the PSA family of vans.  As well as the new platform bodyshop, the Luton plant has reorganised its flow of parts and assembly to use two floors instead of three, dedicating the ground floor solely for assembly and final trim.  A conveyor moves platforms from the new underground welding line to the first floor where the bodies are built up, before dropping down to the ground floor.  Machines are crammed in to these new areas as PSA cracks the whip to improve workflow and shrink the production line footprint, one of its production efficiency measures.  Body assembly starts when body panels arrive in trucks from France, crated in sets of 18 and paired left/right to ensure full sets.  After being loosely ‘tabbed’ together they move into assembly, where 128 new robots are deployed on bodyside welding alone.  Sparks fly, as usual, in the body-framing welding station, which is also new, and is the centrepiece of the plant.  Usefully, more automation has raised output, and by mid-2020 Vauxhall plans 90,000 to 100,000 units per year, considerably more than the 60,000 annually under GM. At 100,000, the paint shop will be at full capacity.  PSA has introduced innovations in final assembly, too, notably a new automated parts handling system dubbed the ‘supermarket’ that automatically loads components into bins to be delivered line-side by a fleet of 19 robotic, automatically guided vehicles (AGV).  This reduces line-side clutter at the 200-plus final assembly stations, essential because the new PSA van offers more build variations, requiring more parts at each station.  A spin-off from this extra complication is a
Origin: Analysis: why Vauxhall’s Luton plant has a bright future

Lotus CEO Phil Popham on the Evija hypercar, future plans and Brexit

Lotus has just revealed the 1973bhp Evija, the all-electric hypercar it claims will be “the most powerful production car in the world”. Talking to Autocar at the reveal event, CEO Phil Popham explains the thinking behind the Evija and the next steps for the iconic sports car brand. Why have you chosen to build a car like this — so exclusive and expensive? Popham: “We believe that if you want to make ripples, you have to made a splash. If you want to be on the map, you have to make a mark. This car shows what our future can be like. It shows what we can do, and it paves the way for future visionary Lotus models.” Does it mean you’re planning a succession of hyper-expensive models? “First of all, our 10-year plan, which we call Vision 80, contains a commitment to be ‘for the driver’, first, last and always. Lotus models will always be at the heart of driver involvement and enjoyment. But the range of cars we have now runs from the mid £50,000s to well over £100,000 and we see our core future models, apart from our new Hypercar, as continuing to be in the that range. Having said that, we do believe the Lotus brand has the equity to go beyond where it is. But that’s not our immediate strategy.” What is your immediate strategy? “After we’ve built our 130 hypercars we’ll concentrate on rebuilding our core sports car range. We will have a combustion-powered sports car to show you towards the end of next year, for sale after that. Beyond that car, every Lotus, in whatever segment, will have a full electric version.” There’s been a suggestion that in your journey towards electrification you might skip hybrids all together… “That is certainly an option.” How much will you grow under the 10-year plan? “Let’s start from the beginning. We made 1700 cars last year, but as it currently stands Hethel make over 5000 on a single shift. That means over 10,000 on a double shift — and I believe we’ll outgrow Hethel in its current guise. After all, we have an ambitious plan to move into new segments.” What will you do when you’ve outgrown Hethel? “We can either do something radical at Hethel, or we can move somewhere else as well. But it’s important to say that making cars in different locations wouldn’t change the DNA of the company. We won’t build anything unless it’s a) profitable, and b) can be called a true Lotus. And we’d never made the same car in multiple locations.” Isn’t your ‘For the driver’ strap-line rather time-limited? Surely we’re moving closer to full autonomy? “I don’t believe it will become time expired. Progress with other, much bigger manufacturers tends to focus on mobility and ownership models, which are leading to cars becoming commoditised. But a Lotus will always be a car to use and enjoy in your leisure time. But we’ll certainly harness some of the great technology of the future.” How do you believe Brexit is affecting Lotus? “Our message to the government over the past three years hasn’t changed: we just need to get this deal done. And it now looks like that’s what will happen. Even if we exit without a deal, we believe other deals will be done; we have hundreds of years of history as a trading nation to help us through. Meanwhile at Lotus we’re taking short-term contingency steps. We’re planning for some disruption. But nothing about Brexit will change our core
Origin: Lotus CEO Phil Popham on the Evija hypercar, future plans and Brexit

A meeting of minds: Aston Martin, JLR and Porsche lead engineers debate the future of performance cars

Pick three blokes – any three blokes in the world – to sit around a table with and talk cars. Fast cars, interesting cars, everyday cars, driver’s cars, electric cars, motorsport and more. Come on – who are you gonna pick?  Well, you couldn’t do much better than these three: Matt Becker (chief engineer of vehicle attribute engineering at Aston Martin), Mike Cross (chief engineer, vehicle targets and sign-off, at Jaguar Land Rover) and Andreas Preuninger (director of high-performance cars at Porsche).  These three blokes will each be well known to regular Autocar readers because they’re among the most influential figures in the industry for defining and tuning the character traits of the very best driver’s cars in the world. They collectively have years of experience doing the sort of job most of us could only dream of, and have personally shaped and tailored some utterly unforgettable metal.  We have occasion to talk to them, each in isolation, pretty regularly. But never before the chance to sit them around the same table to gossip about the state of the sports car industry, about each other’s wares, and about all of our hopes and fears for the future of enthusiast motordom.  Not, at least, until now. You guys have what some would consider the best jobs in the world. But how do you know when it’s done? When is a car finished?  Mike Cross: The trouble is they never really are.  Andreas Preuninger: It’s never done (smiles).  Mike Cross: You just get to a point of sufficiently diminished returns that you know you’re ready for production. I’m not sure I’m ever completely satisfied with something, but I know when I’ve achieved my targets. Would your colleagues call you a perfectionist?  MC: Definitely. They’d be exasperated with me.  Matt Becker: They might use some other words, too Do you find you agree with your peers about what makes a really good driver’s car?  MB: There’s certainly agreement within my team, because my guys are hand-picked to recognise what ‘good’ is. It’s a little bit subjective. But you can’t do it all yourself. You need a team with the same instincts as you.  AP: That’s especially true, even now, with chassis engineering. You’re so dependent on what you feel in a car; and that’s really what we try to create and fine-tune. We want the driver to feel what the car is doing and to be sure that the electronic systems are adding to that feeling. It’s a challenge – but it’s important. It’s not just about empirical tests and computers and simulations. What do young engineers do better now than you did at their age, and what do you wish they did better?  MC: They’re a lot smarter academically than I was, but I’m not sure they’re quite as practical. I think they’ve got to want to love cars, they’ve got to be interested on a mechanical level, and they need an aptitude for it.  AP: I second that completely. Right now, there are still enough engineers with gasoline in their veins to keep us going, because you have to live for the job, to be creative and to think about it day and night in order to be really good. The generation of youngsters right now needs pushing a little bit more and their practical thinking is a little bit short. Could you pick the guy in your department who’ll be doing your job in 20 years’ time?  AP: Yes.  MB: Not yet.  MC: Not sure. If you were starting out today, do you think you’d pick the same career?  MB: Yes. Because, as Mike says, you don’t stop learning; and making use of the talent of the younger guys, with the heads for software, to get the feeling you want in the car is great fun.  MC: It never becomes routine because the next car is always different. Always more to learn.  AP: I’d definitely do it all over again. The sports car has been declared dead so many times, but where there’s technology, there’s always a way. The next 20 years will be even more exciting than the last.   Have driver assist systems made your cars better?  MB: The systems can – and do – enhance the appeal of the car. And in our cars, when you switch them off, they stay off. They’re not still active in the background. The fact is stability and traction control systems have improved so much and have become so clever, they can even pre-empt what’s going to happen to the car. It’s all about tuning them properly so they don’t dilute the driving experience – which is why we’re here.  AP: The big question about them for me is always ‘what purpose is it achieving?’. Torque vectoring on a sports car is very useful. People taking their cars on track days at the weekend want to be quick. So there is a tangible benefit.  MC: Also, getting the vehicle fundamentals right is so important. Then the assistance systems only need to augment what you’ve already got. You want the car to be engaging at low speeds and high speeds. Can you get the same character we currently see from the engine in a Porsche, Jaguar or Aston Martin from an electric motor?  MC: No. And I
Origin: A meeting of minds: Aston Martin, JLR and Porsche lead engineers debate the future of performance cars

Back to the future: revisiting the Audi A2

I’m not old enough to reminisce about when this part of East London was all fields, but I do remember a time when the Greenwich Peninsula seemed to be mud and cranes. I did a photoshoot here almost exactly 20 years ago, when what was then the Millennium Dome was still being hastily constructed ahead of its official opening on 1 January 2000.  Back then, the Dome looked like a vast circus tent – pretty much what it was. It stood by itself in the middle of a wilderness of reclaimed industrial land. Now renamed the O2 Arena, it is surrounded by so much development that photographer Luc Lacey struggles to find a vista that will allow both it and the Audi A2 to occupy the same frame.  O2 and A2 seem like an appropriate fit given it is also 20 years since Audi’s forward-looking supermini went on sale. When we decided to do a story about cars that were ahead of their time, there were several strong candidates for the starring role but one clear winner. The A2 was so futuristic in 1999, it feels as if the world is only just catching up to it; the similarly sized AI:ME concept that Audi showed at this year’s Shanghai motor show seems hardly more daring.  Yet, like the Dome, the A2 was a failure. Visitors trickled rather than flocked to the expensively assembled Millennium Experience, it drew less than half the numbers it was meant to and closed at the end of 2000 having racked up big losses. The Audi lasted longer, on sale until 2005, but high prices and limited practicality restricted sales success.  Yet it was a hugely brave statement. When Audi showed an aluminium-bodied supermini concept in 1997, few thought it would make production. Audi had never produced a car in this segment – the first-generation A3 was still a novelty at the time – and the only aluminium car in the line-up was the range-topping A8. Yet Audi did it, building the A2 around what was basically an aluminium spaceframe. It wasn’t just a car, it was a manifesto piece. In the days before premium superminis (this was two years before the first BMW Mini launched), Audi wanted to prove that small and relatively inexpensive didn’t have to mean basic and cheaply engineered. But it was also built to answer the very 2019 question of how to transport four people while using the minimum amount of fuel.  Weighing less than 900kg meant that small, efficient engines could be used. In the UK, there was the choice at launch between a four-cylinder 1.4-litre petrol and a three-cylinder TDI diesel of the same displacement, both of which made 74bhp. A more expensive 1.6-litre direct injection FSI petrol followed later. In Europe, Audi also offered an ultra-frugal 1.2 TDI version, which was the first production car to deliver ‘three litre’ consumption, returning 94.2mpg. Packaging perfection The utter familiarity of the A2 means its design has lost almost all of the radical originality it possessed at launch. Even this gleaming example borrowed from Audi’s heritage collection, and with just 28,000 miles showing, blends invisibly into any UK streetscape. But as numbers continue to dwindle – and they are falling fast – that freshness will return; the A2 sits close to the top of my list of near-certain future classics.  It is still one of the most space-efficient vehicles of all time, vying with the original Mini for packaging magic. Tall, narrow construction was chosen to both minimise aerodynamic drag and create serious interior volume. While a strict four-seater, the A2 has proper space for four adults, yet overall dimensions are shorter than almost any modern supermini – it is fully 200mm shorter than the new A1 but roomier inside.  The pared-back ethos holds true for equipment levels. Audi demanded A2 owners share the car’s minimalist philosophy when it came to extras. This SE model got air conditioning and a single-slot CD player – neither of which was standard on the base car – but that’s pretty much it for toys. The A2 was the last Audi sold in the UK with manual rear windows.  The driving experience is rich in contrast. Much is impressively modern: the A2 still feels light, agile and responsive – far more so than the stodgy first-generation Mercedes A-Class ever did. Low-speed ride is as clumpy as I remember it being when new, although the cabin is completely free of squeaks and rattles over Greenwich’s many traffic-calming measures. But on the long motorway schlep to London from the car’s home in the Midlands, the baby Audi feels composed at a rapid cruise, the tall seating position giving a crossover-ish eyeline and with refinement levels that still feel good for a supermini.  The 1.4-litre TDI engine has aged considerably less well; its main instructional role here is showing just how far diesel technology has come on in the past two decades. It’s vocal and unrefined, filling the cabin with thrum and vibration at idle and turning positively industrial when pressed harder. The powerband is narrow – there’s little urge below
Origin: Back to the future: revisiting the Audi A2

FCA boss sees a future of electrification for Dodge’s performance cars

2019 Dodge Challenger Hellcat RedeyeNick Tragianis / Driving Dodge has always hung its hat on power and performance. With vehicles like the 797-horsepower 2019 Dodge Challenger Hellcat Redeye shouldering the legacy set by decades of angry, old-school American muscle cars, whatever comes next had better bring the grunt. If you ask Tim Kuniskis, head of passenger cars for Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, what the future of Dodge looks like, the answer is simple: electric.“I think the absolute future is electrification of these cars,” Kuniskis said in an interview with Automotive News following the recent unveiling of the wide-body versions of the Charger SRT Hellcat and Scat Pack. “That’s not necessarily bad. It could be (battery electric), it could be (plug-in hybrid), it could be regular hybrid, could be e-axles, any one of the number of electric technologies. But I am a firm believer that electrification will be the key to high performance in the future.”While using the phrase “not necessarily bad” doesn’t exactly set the bar sky high, you can understand what Kuniskis is getting at. What’s keeping Dodge on the sidelines of the performance electrification race is the price. While high-end brands like Porsche, Ferrari and Acura are finding success in the segment, Dodge’s brand tenant of affordability has limited the pursuit of fully or partially electric Dodge performance vehicles.  “We don’t have the price points of the batteries down to a place where, quite honestly, it’s a mainstream proposition,” Kuniskis said. “You do see it in the upper end. You see it in the new Ferrari that just came out, you saw it in the LaFerrari before that, you saw it in the 918, you saw it in the NSX.” “So there’s absolutely a performance advantage to it, it’s just a question of when the consumer acceptance is going to be for that. And I think it’s going to be as soon as the price points come down, it becomes a mainstream viable option.”But what would a Hellcat be without its angry howl? I guess we’ll find out sooner or later.  Until then, rev it if you’ve got
Origin: FCA boss sees a future of electrification for Dodge’s performance cars

Rivian is devouring staff from Ford, Apple, Tesla, Faraday Future and more

2019 Rivian R1T Electric TruckHandout / Rivian One EV startup’s loss is another EV startup’s gain. If struggling brand Faraday Future doesn’t understand this now, after having around 50 employees (some who had been furloughed) cross over to take positions at the up-and-coming EV-maker Rivian, it likely never will. And it’s not the only company having its engineering department hollowed out by Rivian. According to some LinkedIn profile-combing performed by The Verge, Rivian has on-boarded dozens of employees from Tesla, McLaren and Ford, as well as some key players from other big tech brands like Apple. In fact, when it recently came time to name its first CTO, the Michigan-based startup called over Mike Bell, a former Apple bigwig who was one of the important players behind the first iPhone. And this aggressive hiring pace is apparently ongoing. Rivian’s director of corporate communications, Michael McHale, told The Verge that the company has a “natural hiring process and is always looking for people with the right skills.”Now, Rivian has been rocking the boat in other ways, too, like when it received support from Amazon to the tune of US$700 million, or when it got another US$500 million from Ford, granting the automaker exclusive access to Rivian tech.  But for all the hype and financially backed votes of confidence, some still have their doubts about the brand’s ability to meet its promises, especially when it comes to that pickup truck and its projected 640-km range, which is really what all the hoopla is all about.The race to be the first long-range EV pickup truck to market is ongoing, but Rivian now has 750 reasons (and counting) why it could get there first.
Origin: Rivian is devouring staff from Ford, Apple, Tesla, Faraday Future and more

James Ruppert: the future of the banger is in danger

I must say I’m a bit concerned about the future of the banger. In 10 or 20 years’ time, I may be too incoherent and senile to care, but right now, it doesn’t look that good.  Insurers Admiral did the usual attention-seeking thing and revealed that there are just 799 Ford Granadas in circulation. Or at least on our roads. Well, that always happens: what was once street furniture eventually, through natural wastage and rust, becomes a rarity. This isn’t bangers dying out: it is just them becoming classics. What is supposed to happen is that you move on to the next generation of neglected and overlooked 2000-onwards motors.  Things like a Honda Civic, which is a recurring favourite of yours. A 2001 Civic 1.4i with 112,000 miles as an unwanted dealer part-exchange costs £295. It has those massive wide-eyed headlights and just some age-related cosmetic marks and knocks. That’s value for money right there.  The Toyota equivalent is the Corolla. A 1997 1.6 GS can still do a job, especially at £475, which seems rather pricey actually, but if it never breaks down, then that’s a just-add-petrol situation.  The point I am making here is that these are the utterly reliables that have proved themselves in the real world. However, the next generation of potential bangers is not looking good. A reader writes – and I will protect his identity – that he has recently spent quality time delivering hire cars and what he is experiencing is not great when it comes to wear and tear. Obviously, hire cars lead a very hard life indeed, but these are 19-plate vehicles and are no more than 10 weeks old and with mileages that are less than 1500.  So let’s start with some worn carpets on a Hyundai i10 and Honda Jazz. More serious is a service light being on at 3500 miles with a Ford Tourneo Courier. Annoying is a frozen touchscreen on a Ford Focus and irritating, especially for neighbours, is a repeated alarm activation on a Citroën C4 Cactus. Driver’s door switches not working on a Mini Countryman need to be snagged and false tyre pressure warnings on both a Jazz and a Mitsubishi Outlander are a surprise.  Our undercover correspondent signed off with a “Best of luck buying a banger in 10 to 15 years’ time”. He has a point. Cars are now needlessly complicated. It is disturbing that the cars he is driving are box fresh and already showing signs of failure. I spent some time with a major supplier of warranties called Motoreasy. They have the real-world stats, which identify repeat reliability offenders. Maybe I’ll tell you some real-life breakdown stories soon. What we almost bought this week The 1.8T is the orphan in the Mk1 range but no matter: this one, a 2002-reg with 112,000 miles, looks like a bargain. It’s got full service history, claims the private seller, and has had just three previous owners. This should go in its favour – except for the fact that they could all have been animals behind the wheel.  Tales from Ruppert’s garage My 1964 Mini, which has been piling on the miles recently, made a guest appearance at the Autocar Awards and was in a little film that was shown on the night. I made the epic journey. Well, it was only a 250-ish-mile round trip, and blimey was it noisy. I usually do half-hour blasts, but six hours at 250dB was rather tiring for someone of my age, but huge fun.  I will give it a quick once-over because it is due an MOT. Legally, it doesn’t need one, but one would be stupid not to.  Reader’s ride Steve Lee is giving us an update on his Fabia 1.9 TDI estate: “It is not far short of 177,000 miles. It was originally for my son, who needed something cheap and economical. Once he had finished with it, I took it over and used it for work and now my wife uses it.  “During its time with us, it took four of us and a boot load to near Frankfurt and back at 60mpg. That was when it had done 144,000 miles. Since then, I’ve used it to move the contents of my daughter’s flat, twice.  “While we’ve had it, it has had only routine maintenance and servicing, a couple of front dampers, rear door locking solenoids, two brake light switches and a few minor things. I have done all the work myself. It’s been the best car I’ve ever had and I’ve had a few.” Question: I’ve got £5000 to spend on a first car for my 18-year-old daughter. Is this enough or would I be better off paying a smaller deposit and £100 a month for something newer? Gordon Turner, Bedford Answer: For £100 a month and a £200 deposit, you could get her a 2016 Renault Twingo with 27,000 miles but that’s a four-year PCP with an optional final payment of £2300. Simply put, you’ve paid £5000 over the term but still don’t own the car. So see if you can persuade her to take a 2015 Skoda Citigo SE with 38,000 miles for £5000 dead – no deposit, no monthly payments and she can part-ex it any time. John Evans Question: I’ve been observed doing 38mph in a 30mph zone by speed watch volunteers. I was caught doing the same speed by police in
Origin: James Ruppert: the future of the banger is in danger

Future pedestrian intersections could predict when you’ll cross

Successfully navigating a crossing requires pedestrians and drivers to be mutually aware. Big Brother is watching, and he wants you to cross the road safely. In an attempt to improve pedestrian and traffic flow, and reduce jaywalking, the City of Vienna has ordered a research project to look at the potential future of the pedestrian intersection. Researchers at TU Graz’s Institute of Computer Graphics and Vision claim to have hit upon an “intelligent pedestrian traffic light” system that uses cameras to identify when people are ready and waiting to cross the road and automatically prompt lights to change. In doing so, the system would not just create efficiencies for those on foot – not to mention remove the terrible strain of having to push a button (ouch!) – but improve traffic flow as well by continuously monitoring and anticipating pedestrian movement. “The green phase can be extended in the case of large groups of persons, who require more time to cross the road,” explained Horst Possegger from the Institute of Computer Graphics and Vision. “And if persons leave the waiting area before the lights have turned to green, this is also passed on to the lights. The traffic lights subsequently don’t switch to green and there are no unnecessary waiting times for motorised traffic.” According to the release, the cameras mounted on the traffic lights need just one second to pick up a pedestrian and predict their intent, and another second to deem that prediction “reliable.” Creepy or cool? We say bring on the cameras, Big Bro. Ain’t nobody got time for buttons anyway.
Origin: Future pedestrian intersections could predict when you’ll cross

Nova Scotia trying to get ahead of the future of driving

Cabot Trail in Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia.Handout The last time Nova Scotia made major changes to the rules of the road, William Lyon Mackenzie King was shuffling around the Prime Minister’s office and World War II had yet to begin. While it has been amended many times, Nova Scotia’s Motor Vehicle Act hasn’t been rewritten in nearly a century. A new government bill aims to change that fact. Introduced as Bill 80 in October, the Traffic Safety Act uses flexible language so government can update it in the future, responding to changes in how roads are used. For example, in planning for the eventuality of fully autonomous vehicles or vehicles with autonomous-like driving aids, the new Act has included provisions dictating drivers must be ready to grab control of the vehicle at all times. From the legislation: “A (driver) must be positioned at the controls of the vehicle and, at all times while a vehicle is being driven on a highway, the person must be able to personally drive the vehicle, irrespective of whether the vehicle is capable of operating autonomously or in an autonomous mode. (S.153)” The replacement for the old Motor Vehicle Act also clamps down on the use of devices which are a major contributor to distracted driving. The old law only specified texting as a moving offense, creating legal issues such as people beating distracted driving charges in court by claiming they used a cellphone for something other than texting. In those cases, the onus was on the cops and prosecution to prove the activity. These new regs cover “hand-held communication/entertainment device” and any other “prescribed electronic device” including a GPS, so scofflaws planning to use that old defence are out of luck. Fines for this infraction have jumped, too. Still, the snazzy new Traffic Safety Act doesn’t entirely leave the old world behind. One section refers to the mishandling of a “beast of burden” on a highway. We doubt they’re talking about the Rolling Stones song, but maybe they’re referring to semi-trailers. The revised language also recognizes roadways as shared spaces and that pedestrians, cyclists, and those who respond to roadside emergencies deserve extra protection from motor vehicles. A government spokesperson said it will take about two years from passage before all new regulations and the new law are in place. Check out the new Traffic Safety Act at this link:
Origin: Nova Scotia trying to get ahead of the future of driving