To discover how lightly a full service history is treated, I visited a used car dealer and a franchise dealer in search of a couple of used cars out of warranty. I hoped they’d have poor service histories and wondered how the sales staff would handle the situation. At the used car dealer, I quickly identified my target motor: a 2011- reg Audi A3 Sportback 2.0 TDI S line with 135,000 miles, priced at £4395. The salesman produced its service book, which showed only four services had been carried out: one at 21,000 miles in 2012, another at 44,000 miles at the end of the same year and a third in 2013 at 67,000 miles, all by Audi dealers, and then nothing until early 2019 when, at 130,000 miles, it was serviced by an independent garage. Unfazed by this revelation, the salesman said he had the previous owner’s word that the car had been serviced regularly during the intervening six years and 63,000 miles. So that was all right then… I left, pondering the meaning of service history. The Audi had some but by no means could it be described as full. In any case, I wondered, what is full service history? Is it an unbroken line of services performed every year or 12,000 miles, or at the manufacturer’s recommended intervals? Is it full only when all the minor and major services have been carried out, in addition to other periodic work? If that was the case, you’d have to scrutinise all the workshop invoices to find out exactly what was done. Amazingly, some dealers do, which is why they put a higher value on full invoice history as distinct from full service history. On that point, a friend recently had his 2016-reg Volkswagen Scirocco TDI, which had done 33,000 miles, serviced at a VW dealership. It was due a major service, but because he’s planning to sell it in February 2020, he opted for a minor. In doing so, his vehicle missed, among other things, a change of air, fuel and pollen filters, and a thorough, wheels-off brake check. Not that the car’s next owner will know. They will see from the service book that the Scirocco has a full service history, yet on one occasion, it had a minor service when it should have had a major. Webuyanycar.com is one company that takes service history rather more seriously. It defines a full one as conforming to the manufacturer’s schedule. It also advises that car buyers find out what service the car is due to have next since, if it’s a major, for example, it could be expensive. From the dealer with the Audi A3, I popped into a franchise dealer, a Renault agent. My attention was caught by a Captur Dynamique S Nav TCe, a 2015-reg model that had done 35,000 miles and was priced at £8295. The salesman agreed that service history was important and recounted a story concerning one of his customers who, on the day he was due to collect his new Renault, handed over the service book for his part-exchange, a four-year-old Vauxhall Zafira. “It had no service stamps in it,” said the salesman. “I couldn’t give him what I’d offered for his car, and when I told the trader who had agreed to buy it that it had no service history, he reduced his offer by £1750. My customer ended up selling his Zafira to a car buying company for £1000 less than I’d originally offered him.” He now entered the Captur’s details on Renault’s ICM online workshop database, intending to show me its service history. It recorded the car as having its PDI (pre-delivery inspection) in August 2015 – and then nothing. He hurried off in search of the car’s service book. When he eventually returned, it showed the car had been serviced just twice, at 22,000 and 26,000 miles, both services carried out by an independent garage in 2018. There were no invoices to show what work had been done. “They’ll probably have been oil changes,” said the salesman. “In any case, the Captur can go for 40,000 miles without one.” In fact, the model’s oil change interval is 18,000 miles or two years. I asked the National Franchised Dealers Association (NFDA) what it thinks about dealers glossing over the fine detail of service histories in this way. Sue Robinson, its director, said: “It is essential that franchised retailers provide their customers with clear and accurate information about the service history of a vehicle. Transparency and integrity are vital to our sector.” Was the motor trader that the Renault salesman mentioned right to penalise the four-year-old Zafira without service history to the tune of £1750? Derren Martin, head of valuations at Cap HPI, says the cost of having no service history depends on factors including current vehicle supply and demand, the make of the car and whether it’s still in warranty. “It’s a complex picture,” he said. “At the moment, the supply of used cars is high but demand is low, so anything less than perfect – for example, a car with little or no service history – has to be priced to sell. “In a normal period, the cost of no service history is about £500 on a
Origin: A car’s service history: what is it really worth?
history
66 Years of Corvette complaints: a history of hating America
A 1977 Chevrolet Corvette.Chevrolet The Corvette is Americas sports car. Sure, it wasnt the first to come along, and it has seen plenty of competitors come and go, but GMs plastic two-seater remains the favourite sports car of a nation.Today we have the National Corvette Museum, where various models are enshrined (when they arent being restored from sinkhole damage).And on any given weekend, you can find several Corvettes (along with their fashionably dressed owners) at basically any classic car show.Still, the Corvette has not existed free of criticism. From its troubled beginning as a flimsy show car, professional car reviewers have not held back on sharing their honest opinions on the Corvette.Having been obsessed with Corvettes since well, before I was eating solid foods, Ive built a veritable library of period road tests of the model. And so on the eve of the C8s debut, I pored over my collection of Corvette road tests and found the rudest things reviewers said about each of the seven generations so far.C1: 1953 to 1962The production C1 Corvette was born haphazardly out of GMs Motorama show, and its kinda evident when examined up close. Most reviewers were simply happy Chevrolet was actually building the thing, but it wasnt all roses. Especially in the handling department.A driving impression not entirely favorable concerns cornering, said Motor Life in 1954. The outlet said it showed a definite unwillingness to tuck back in after flinging the back end out in a corner, and mentioned that the ride was not as comfortable as other Chevrolets.From its clean design in 53, the Corvette had grown a smattering of Harley-Earl-dictated chrome details by 1958, some of which displeased the editors of SCI magazine. They disliked the washboard-like phony louvers on the hood and Pontiac-like chrome strips on the trunk. In regards to handling, the magazine said it would simply plow right off the road as power was applied. Hardly high praise!Yes, the C1 Corvette had a handling problem, and by 1961 it still hadnt gone away. When either end of the Corvette does swing out in a corner, it swings pretty quickly and without much warning , so some vigilance is required said SCI in a 1961 road test. In 1962, Motor Trend found the ergonomics rather poor and the build quality even worse, but still said the car was completely satisfying.They said the steering wheel is mounted in a vertical position and most drivers will find it too close.It also leaves little room between the drivers lap and the bottom of the rim. This and the miserably mounted throttle pedal (it kept falling off) are the only real beefs we have about this otherwise completely satisfying car. So the C1 was ill-handling, was (in some years) covered with chrome trinkets and had old-world ergonomics. But lots of that would change in 1963.C2: 1963 to 1967The C2 Corvette was a revolution. Benchmarked against the new Jaguar E-Type during development, the C2 was fast, beautiful, and technically advanced. Made only for a short spell, the C2 is now the classic Corvette. But what drawbacks did the car have when it was new?I tried to find evidence to support the oft-repeated tale that reviewers found the split rear window annoying and found absolutely nothing to support that. Even when turning a critical eye to the car, most reviewers had very few bad things to say about it. Some equated it with the contemporary Ferrari 250 GT. But it wasnt perfect.In 1963, Car and Driver said On bumpy turns its at its worst, veering freely from one course to another, making high-frequency corrections standard operating procedure. Regarding the four-wheel drum brakes, the magazine noted fade is easily provoked. Four-wheel discs would be introduced in 1965 to quell that issue.But by 1967, Car and Driver was still unhappy about the handling. The Sting-Ray rides softly and vaguelyyoure never sure what the car is trying to tell you, editors wrote. In all, reviews here were fairly positive. Maybe the C2s classic status is well-earned.C3: 1968 to 1982The C3 is possibly the most misunderstood car ever made. Its definitely the most misunderstood Corvette. I own a beat-up 1970 model, and nearly caught fire after I claimed it was the second-best Corvette generation of them all. Over its lengthy 14-year run from 1968 to 1982, it morphed from a no-nonsense sports car bristling with power and seething with lumpy-cam attitude; to an overweight, outdated fashion statement on aluminum wheels.The fastest and most powerful Corvettes of the classic era were C3s and the slowest and least powerful V8 Corvettes were also C3s. The complaints I found for the C3 reflect this shift.Early complaints for chrome-bumper cars like mine point to its brutal, animalistic nature. In 1968, Car Life said, The 427 rides like a truck. It shakes so badly on normal roadways that you have to hang on to the wheel just to keep it from bouncing out of your grip. The fiberglass body twists like a snake, and the big V-8
Origin: 66 Years of Corvette complaints: a history of hating America
Audi RS history – 25 years of Audi Sport models
It’s 25 years since the formidable Audi RS2 performance estate was launched, packing a snorting Porsche-fettled five-cylinder unit and spearheading Ingolstadt’s long line of hot family haulers. We’ve been considering some of the most significant models to bear the RS badge since 1994, and seeing whether the pioneering RS2’s spirit lives on. With an aim to rekindle some of the B7 RS4 magic, Audi launched the RS5 coupe in 2010. Powered by the same naturally-aspirated 4.2-litre V8 as the B7, but with mild tweaking to increase power to 444bhp with an all-singing 8500rpm redline, it was only available with a seven-speed twin-clutch gearbox. Zero to 62mph was covered in 4.6sec and it had genuine all-weather performance. However, it lacked just a touch of engagement and still felt weighty. That same year, the Audi RS3 was hastened into production. With the TT RS’ 2.5-litre five-pot turbocharged engine shoehorned into the bonnet and mated to a seven-speed dual-clutch gearbox, the RS3 proved to be a more than capable performance hatchback. Despite the engine character, everyday usability and practicality, the RS3’s dynamic prowess was dampened by its inert steering and lack of chassis finesse. In 2012, Quattro GmBH reverted back to its traditional format for the new RS4, launching it in estate form only. The styling was turned up a notch, with steroidal wheel arches, triangular air intakes on the front fascia and large oval-tipped exhausts at the rear, which added up to a wonderfully macho-looking car. It utilised the same 4.2-litre V8 444bhp motor from the RS5 with 0-62mph covered in 4.7sec while being limited to 155mph. An optional extra would allow this to be stretched to 174mph. That year also saw the debut of the C7 RS6, with Audi retiring its predecessor’s mighty V10 powerplant in favour of a downsized 4.0-litre twin-turbocharged V8 making 553bhp. Even with the reduced engine capacity, the new RS6 remains quicker than its predecessor – rattling off the 0-62mph sprint in a staggering 3.9sec and passing the quarter-mile mark just three-tenths slower than a Porsche 997 GT2. The latest-generation RS5 has made the switch to a 444bhp 2.9-litre V6 unit. Emissions regulations led to a delay in the UK, with both coupé and sportback versions finally going on sale in 2019. Less potent S-badged performance models now make use of a 345bhp mild-hybrid diesel V6, as the brand seeks to sustain its performance offering in the face of increasingly stringent emissions legislation. Now, with the refreshed Audi TT RS, forthcoming updated RS3, and an ambitious target to futureproof its most potent models, Audi looks set to continue the high-performance sub-brand’s impressive legacy. Aaron
Origin: Audi RS history – 25 years of Audi Sport models
Smallest race car in history, Allard Atom, restored and up for sale
The Allard Atom, the smallest race car in the world, was a product of circumstance. Hemmings details in its blog how, in the 1950s in England, Ronnie Greene, the manager of a track in London called Wimbledon Speedway, noted there was a national thirst for automotive speedway racing and few tracks dedicated to the sport.He also noted that Wimbledon Speedway was designed for motorcycles and would not support a field of full-sized vehicles racing down it.So he tasked racer and founder of the London-based Allard Motor Company, Sydney Allard, with building a car that would use the 500-cc JAP engines common in racing motorcycles at the time and give the local race fans something else to cheer. With a wheelbase of four-and-a-half feet and a front track (the wider of the two) of three feet, the Allard Atom is hardly larger than a ride-on mower. But the 500-cc engine, which runs on pure methanol, was said to accelerate the car at the same rate as Formula 1 cars of the era, pushing its tiny body to a top speed of 150 mph (241 km/h). To save space for the driver and engine, there’s no transmission or brakes. Instead, drivers were expected to adjust speed in the corners. This was to be the first vehicle in the British ‘midget racing’ series. Unfortunately, only two Allard Atoms were ever made. One was crashed and FUBAR’d, and the other is right here. The last remaining Allard Atom has been fully restored and shows the original red-and-black colour scheme, punctuated with a gold star on the nose. It is scheduled to cross the block at Coys’ Blenheim Palace auction where it is expected to fetch from £10,000 to £15,000 ($17,000 to
Origin: Smallest race car in history, Allard Atom, restored and up for sale