Jim Mason, a forensic engineer with ARCCA, helped us access and download the contents of our cars infotainment computer.Geoffrey Fowler / Washington Post Behind the wheel, its nothing but you, the open road and your car quietly recording your every move.On a recent drive, a 2017 Chevrolet collected my precise location. It stored my phones ID and the people I called. It judged my acceleration and braking style, beaming back reports to its maker General Motors over an always-on Internet connection.Cars have become the most sophisticated computers many of us own, filled with hundreds of sensors. Even older models know an awful lot about you. Many copy over personal data as soon as you plug in a smartphone.But for the thousands you spend to buy a car, the data it produces doesnt belong to you. My Chevys dashboard didnt say what the car was recording. It wasnt in the owners manual. There was no way to download it.To glimpse my car data, I had to hack my way in.Spilling our Chevy Volt’s secretsJim Mason hacks into cars for a living, but usually just to better understand crashes and thefts. The Caltech-trained engineer works in Oakland, California, for a firm called ARCCA that helps reconstruct accidents. He agreed to help conduct a forensic analysis of my privacy.I chose a Chevrolet as our test subject because its maker GM has had the longest of any automaker to figure out data transparency. It began connecting cars with its OnStar service in 1996, initially to summon emergency assistance. Today, GM has more than 11 million 4G LTE data-equipped vehicles on the road. I found a volunteer, Doug, who let us peer inside his two-year-old Chevy Volt.Modern vehicles dont just have one computer. There are multiple, interconnected brains that can generate up to 25 gigabytes of data per hour from sensors all over the car. Even with Masons gear, we could only access some of these systems.This kind of hacking isnt a security risk for most of us it requires hours of physical access to a vehicle. Mason brought a laptop, special software, a box of circuit boards and dozens of sockets and screwdrivers. Buried behind the touch screen and radio controls sits our Chevrolet’s infotainment computer, a box identifiable here by a circle for its fan. Geoffrey Fowler / Washington Post We focused on the computer with the most accessible data: the infotainment system. You might think of it as the cars touch screen audio controls, yet many systems interact with it, from navigation to a synced-up smartphone. The only problem? This computer is buried beneath the dashboard. After an hour of prying and unscrewing, our Chevys interior looked like it had been lobotomized.(Dont try this at home. Seriously we had to take the car into a repair shop to get the infotainment computer reset.)It was worth the trouble when Mason showed me my data. There on a map was the precise location where Id driven to take apart the Chevy. There were my other destinations, such as the hardware store Id stopped at to buy some tape.Among the trove of data points were unique identifiers for my and Dougs phones, and a detailed log of phone calls from the previous week. There was a long list of contacts, right down to peoples address, emails and even photos.Infotainment systems can collect even more. Mason has hacked into Fords that record locations once every few minutes, even when you dont use the navigation system. Hes seen German cars with 300-gigabyte hard drives five times as much as a basic iPhone 11. The Tesla Model 3 can collect video snippets from the cars many cameras. Coming next: face data, used to personalize the vehicle and track driver attention.A privacy policy only a lawyer’s mother could loveMy volunteer car owner Doug asked GM to see the data it collected and shared. The automaker just pointed us to an obtuse privacy policy. Doug also (twice) sent GM a formal request under a 2003 California data law to ask who the company shared his information with. He got no reply.GM spokesman David Caldwell declined to offer specifics on Dougs Chevy, but said the data GM collects generally falls into three categories: vehicle location, vehicle performance and driver behavior. Much of this data is highly technical, not linkable to individuals and doesnt leave the vehicle itself, he said.The company, he said, collects real-time data to monitor vehicle performance to improve safety and to help design future products and services.But there were clues to what more GM knows on its website and app. It offers a Smart Driver score a measure of good driving based on how hard you brake and turn, and how often you drive late at night. Theyll share that with insurance companies, if you want. With paid OnStar service, I could, on demand, locate the cars exact location.The OnStar privacy policy, possibly only ever read by yours truly, grants the company rights to a broad set of personal and driving data without much detail on when and how often it might collect
Origin: What does your car know about you? We hacked a Chevy to find out
know
5 things you need to know about the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E
LOS ANGELES, California — As if calling an SUV a battery-powered one, at that a Mustang doesnt already foist an uphill challenge on this new model, Fords 2021 Mach-E also has to strip sales away from Tesla, prove to Ford shareholders that there really is a mass market for mid-priced electric vehicles and, at the same time, prepare the ultimate of Ford loyalists F-150 owners for the inevitable electrification of their pickup trucks.Thats a pretty steep ask. Heres how Ford plans to do it, plus some background info you just need to know.Ford was first going to just call it “Mach-E”Rumour round the L.A. Auto Show has it Ford originally tried to build the Mach-E on an existing that should be read gas-powered platform, but the engineers couldnt hit their range and performance targets.CHECK OUT ALL OUR LATEST AUTO SHOW COVERAGESo they made a deal with the devil, asking Fords accountants for more money so they could build a bespoke battery-powered chassis. The tithe exacted by the bean-counters? That they name it Mustang so they could build on the name recognition of probably the most famous Ford of all time. Which explains whyFord wants to move a boatload of its electrified sport bruteThis is no halo vehicle or vanity project. Ford is looking to move some (battery-powered) iron, here. I count, for instance, no less than nine distinct trim levels across the Mach-Es five models Select (available early 2021), Premium (late 2020), First Edition (also late 2020), California Route 1 (early 2021) and GT Performance (spring 2021). Thats a huge number of trims from a company that prides itself on efficient manufacturing. The only way to amortize the cost of that proliferation is to sell boatloads of product, which also explains whyFord is sticking it with impressively aggressive pricingBase (Select trim) Mach-Es will start at $50,495 and, unlike Elons $35,000 Model 3, youll actually be able to buy them at that price from launch. Even the all-singing, all-dancing GT Performance Edition will slip in under $83,000 (yes, these prices are all Canadian).Again, Ford plans to move a bunch of Mach-Es in preparation for what will surely be its real heavy-hitter in the EV world, an electrified F-150. The first two models available the Premium and California Route 1 will start at $59,495 (for the standard-range version of the Premium) and $64,495 (for the Route 1 and its extended-range battery). In between Ford’s offering a vast array of powertrain and battery optionsRunning through the Mach-Es order guide is like feasting at the ultimate of electric vehicle buffets. Want a rear-wheel-drive BEV with a big battery that maximizes range? Mach-Es got the California Route 1. Want an all-wheel-drive with a cheaper battery but better performance? Well, Ford has a Premium SR AWD with your name on it that can scoot to 100 clicks in about five-and-a-half-seconds.Wading through the vast array of options and combinations will make your head spin, so Ill attempt to simplify it all for you. There are basically two battery options: a standard-range (SR) 75.7-kilowatt-hour affair; and an extended-range (ER) 98.8-kWh monster.Combine the extended-range unit with a modestly-powered (282-hp) rear-wheel drivetrain and you have the 475-kilometre California Route 1. Package the same 98.8-kilowatt-hour ER hardware with 459 all-wheel-driving horses and you have the GT Performance with its three-and-a-half-second blitz to 100 kilometres an hour (though range is reduced to 375 km).The Premium, which looks to be the backbone of Fords sales effort, can be had with any combination of long- and short-range battery and rear-wheel- or all-wheel-drive powertrains you want, in 255-, 282- and yet another iteration 332-horsepower guises.Dizzy yet? Like the California, the First Edition (which will exact something of a premium $71,995 for its limited quantities) is only available with the extended-range battery, but drives all four wheels with less urge (332 hp) than the GT Performance, resulting in yet another range rating, this time 425 kilometres.Theres a Mach-E for every purse and purpose, and the only way Ford can do this at these (comparatively) aggressive prices is to sell dealerships full of them. 2021 is going to be very interesting for Fords bottom line.The big question, then, is where Ford will find all the zero-emissions enthusiasts to fill Mach-E seats. Its first course of action duh, look at the name, Dave is obviously loyalists. Now whether this means past patrons of Ford in general or of Mustang in particular is anybodys guess.Certainly branding a sport utility vehicle Mustang when it shares nothing but a grille shape and some taillights with your iconic sports car is a brave that should be read risky move. I do think, however, that while Mustang cognoscenti may prove outraged, current Ford owners looking for their first EV will appreciate the tie-up. Theres no doubt Ford also has Tesla firmly in its sights.
Origin: 5 things you need to know about the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford study suggests most Americans don’t know nothin’ about EVs
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAFord As Ford amps up its electric-vehicle campaign in advance of the launch of the electric F-150, it has been trying to get an idea of where people are in terms of acceptance and understanding of the EV market. As part of the brand’s research into the emerging market, it funded a study that polled drivers across international car markets to see just how much or little they understood about EVs. You can see for yourself in the published results on Medium, but it doesn’t exactly tally up to a vote of confidence for the electric future. In fact, it exposes a pretty crucial gap in our societies’ EV education. Perhaps the most startling figure is the percentage of people who believe electric vehicles require gas to run. Forty-two percent of Americans polled believed that to be true. It isn’t, except in a hybrid. It’s also not true that EVs suck at towing, but 67 per cent of people still believe that. Ford recently attempted to correct some of the misconceptions on this front when it used an electric F-150 prototype to tow a 1-million-pound train. Some 90 per cent think EVs can’t keep up off the starting line, believing them to be inferior at accelerating. (They obviously haven’t seen this.) Sixty-five per cent of people who identified as being on the hunt for an AWD said they wouldn’t go with an EV, which might be explained by the gap in understanding of how the batteries function in different weather conditions. The study found that 80 per cent of Americans figure winter cold or summer heat would defeat EVs, which is also not true — well, not entirely, anyway. The point is, collectively speaking, we don’t know squat about electric vehicles. Or at least Americans don’t. Do you think a poll of Canadians would have us fare any
Origin: Ford study suggests most Americans don’t know nothin’ about EVs
These innovations defined the Corvette as we know it
The new Corvette makes an appearance at GMs Motorama car event in 1953.General Motors That the Corvette is here at all is a marvel. Designed as a plastic dream car purely to dazzle car-show-goers, the Corvette has survived multiple GM mutinies and a corporate bankruptcy. Along the way, moments passed that inarguably define Corvette.This is our list of the occasions and innovations that made the Corvette the fast, enduring and lovable car it is today.The V8Its common knowledge the Corvette was launched with the laggardly and un-sexy Chevrolet Stovebolt six-cylinder, so nicknamed for the shape of its head studs. But what GM really wanted to use was Cadillacs 331-cubic-inch OHV V8. Cadillac was then truly the Standard of the World, and was revolted by the idea of sharing its fine engine with a lowly Chevrolet. Thus, the Corvette soldiered on with the straight-six warbling through triple single-barrel carbs.But by 1955, a savior had arisen. The small-block Chevy V8 was nothing short of a revolution. Back then, it measured 265 cubic inches, it was light, it was compact and it was powerful. The Corvette had finally found its engine. The V8 added a much needed dose of power, and a new-for-1955 three-speed manual helped it scoot along even better. The Corvette was inching closer to becoming a real sports car.Literally Zora Arkus-DuntovZora Arkus-Duntov was undoubtedly a mechanical genius and a born racer. His first motorized vehicle was a 350-cc motorcycle that he raced. His parents worried this was too dangerous and told him to buy a car, which they believed would be safer. He bought a race car. He started working at General Motors in 1953, and by 1957 he had developed a performance camshaft for the Corvette that became known as the Duntov Cam; it was used in the gnarliest Corvette engines right up until 1963.Whereas most of GM management was content to let the Corvette stay a sporty-looking boulevardier, Duntov insisted it be a true sports car of the highest order and rarely settled for less. Mr. Duntov may not be the reason the Corvette still exists, but he is the reason it became a real sports car.His fingerprints are all over Corvette innovations, and he was a fixture in the Corvette world, giving his last Corvette presentation just six weeks before his death. His ashes are buried at the National Corvette Museum in Bowling Green, Kentucky (Im not kidding) and he will always be Mr. Corvette.The Fuel InjectionThe first fuel-injected production car was the world-beating Mercedes 300 SL Gullwing of 1954 complete with lambskin fuel filter! Just two years later, in 1956 (for the 1957 model year), Chevrolet made the second-ever fuel-injected production car engine when it installed a Rochester mechanical fuel injection system onto its top-spec 283-cubic-inch V8. The engine made exactly 283 hp, said GM, or one horsepower per cubic inch, a feat few had achieved in a production engine.The fuel-injected engine made the Corvette downright fast, and with acceleration gears, zero to 60 mph could be pulled off in under 6.0 seconds, a staggering number for the late 1950s. Though the injected 283 established the Corvette as a global leader in engineering, it wasnt exactly perfect. The mill was difficult to tune and very sensitive to adjustments, and most shops couldnt figure out how to work on the space-age piece of equipment.As such, most street cars and race cars removed the injection setup for the less efficient but doubtlessly practical dual four-barrel carburetors. Nonetheless, the fuel-injected classic Corvette soldiered on until 1965, reaching a peak output of 375 hp from 327 cubic inches.The Independent Rear SuspensionRace car tech has always had a way of trickling into street cars, and in the early 1960s, the tech the best cars had to have was independent rear suspension (IRS). Jaguar had lead the way on that front with the 1961 E-Type, a year that still saw live axles under cars like the Ferrari, Maserati and Corvette. By 1963, only one would adopt the new tech Corvette. The IRS system had been lobbied for heavily by Duntov, but Chevy execs were finding trouble seeing the value of making an entirely new rear suspension not shared with any other GM model.Various mid-engined CERV prototypes were made to prove the efficacy of the new setup and in the end, the bean counters acquiesced as long as Duntov agreed to use off-the-shelf parts for the Corvettes front suspension to save money. The rear suspension of the C2 (and C3) Corvette uses the half-shafts as the upper suspension arms, and then has typical lower suspension arms.The unique part is the Corvette uses a single transverse leaf spring to suspend all of this instead of two upright coil springs. The transverse leaf keeps the weight of the spring itself lower in the chassis and intrudes less into the cargo space. The independent rear suspension sprung the Corvette into the next era of sports cars.The Big-Block EnginesCorvettes had always been fast, but
Origin: These innovations defined the Corvette as we know it
You know you want this remote-controlled Lego Land Rover Defender
Lego’s Product Ideas are kind of like concepts in the automotive world — they’re one-off builds that are presented to the public to test the waters and gauge interest. If enough people are into it, Lego makes it a set and sells it officially. If not, well, hopefully it was fun to build. The latest Idea to get our attention is this Land Rover Defender using two electric motors driving all four wheels, and a remote control with which to control them. As the builder himself points out, there have been other Lego Defenders in the past, but none have included 4WD or a remote control like this one. The model is constructed on Lego’s Technic chassis, with the creator adding rear pendular suspension, and an L-motor on each of the axles. Apparently the Defender, which is constructed of around 1,800 pieces, one battery pack, and one infra-red receiver, “has a shape that lends itself to Lego very well.” The model currently has two small antennas connected to the roof which communicate with the remote, but the builder believes the model will work perfectly with the brand’s upcoming Technic power system. With the small electric motors geared down and power going to all four wheels, the mini off-roader moves deliberately over all sorts of tiny terrain. If you like the look of the model and wouldn’t mind taking a Lego Defender of your own through an obstacle course in your backyard, you can vote here to support the idea. At the time of publication, the project had 974 of the 10,000 Supporters required to trigger an official review by Lego in 302 days.
Origin: You know you want this remote-controlled Lego Land Rover Defender