A meeting of minds: Aston Martin, JLR and Porsche lead engineers debate the future of performance cars

Pick three blokes – any three blokes in the world – to sit around a table with and talk cars. Fast cars, interesting cars, everyday cars, driver’s cars, electric cars, motorsport and more. Come on – who are you gonna pick?  Well, you couldn’t do much better than these three: Matt Becker (chief engineer of vehicle attribute engineering at Aston Martin), Mike Cross (chief engineer, vehicle targets and sign-off, at Jaguar Land Rover) and Andreas Preuninger (director of high-performance cars at Porsche).  These three blokes will each be well known to regular Autocar readers because they’re among the most influential figures in the industry for defining and tuning the character traits of the very best driver’s cars in the world. They collectively have years of experience doing the sort of job most of us could only dream of, and have personally shaped and tailored some utterly unforgettable metal.  We have occasion to talk to them, each in isolation, pretty regularly. But never before the chance to sit them around the same table to gossip about the state of the sports car industry, about each other’s wares, and about all of our hopes and fears for the future of enthusiast motordom.  Not, at least, until now. You guys have what some would consider the best jobs in the world. But how do you know when it’s done? When is a car finished?  Mike Cross: The trouble is they never really are.  Andreas Preuninger: It’s never done (smiles).  Mike Cross: You just get to a point of sufficiently diminished returns that you know you’re ready for production. I’m not sure I’m ever completely satisfied with something, but I know when I’ve achieved my targets. Would your colleagues call you a perfectionist?  MC: Definitely. They’d be exasperated with me.  Matt Becker: They might use some other words, too Do you find you agree with your peers about what makes a really good driver’s car?  MB: There’s certainly agreement within my team, because my guys are hand-picked to recognise what ‘good’ is. It’s a little bit subjective. But you can’t do it all yourself. You need a team with the same instincts as you.  AP: That’s especially true, even now, with chassis engineering. You’re so dependent on what you feel in a car; and that’s really what we try to create and fine-tune. We want the driver to feel what the car is doing and to be sure that the electronic systems are adding to that feeling. It’s a challenge – but it’s important. It’s not just about empirical tests and computers and simulations. What do young engineers do better now than you did at their age, and what do you wish they did better?  MC: They’re a lot smarter academically than I was, but I’m not sure they’re quite as practical. I think they’ve got to want to love cars, they’ve got to be interested on a mechanical level, and they need an aptitude for it.  AP: I second that completely. Right now, there are still enough engineers with gasoline in their veins to keep us going, because you have to live for the job, to be creative and to think about it day and night in order to be really good. The generation of youngsters right now needs pushing a little bit more and their practical thinking is a little bit short. Could you pick the guy in your department who’ll be doing your job in 20 years’ time?  AP: Yes.  MB: Not yet.  MC: Not sure. If you were starting out today, do you think you’d pick the same career?  MB: Yes. Because, as Mike says, you don’t stop learning; and making use of the talent of the younger guys, with the heads for software, to get the feeling you want in the car is great fun.  MC: It never becomes routine because the next car is always different. Always more to learn.  AP: I’d definitely do it all over again. The sports car has been declared dead so many times, but where there’s technology, there’s always a way. The next 20 years will be even more exciting than the last.   Have driver assist systems made your cars better?  MB: The systems can – and do – enhance the appeal of the car. And in our cars, when you switch them off, they stay off. They’re not still active in the background. The fact is stability and traction control systems have improved so much and have become so clever, they can even pre-empt what’s going to happen to the car. It’s all about tuning them properly so they don’t dilute the driving experience – which is why we’re here.  AP: The big question about them for me is always ‘what purpose is it achieving?’. Torque vectoring on a sports car is very useful. People taking their cars on track days at the weekend want to be quick. So there is a tangible benefit.  MC: Also, getting the vehicle fundamentals right is so important. Then the assistance systems only need to augment what you’ve already got. You want the car to be engaging at low speeds and high speeds. Can you get the same character we currently see from the engine in a Porsche, Jaguar or Aston Martin from an electric motor?  MC: No. And I
Origin: A meeting of minds: Aston Martin, JLR and Porsche lead engineers debate the future of performance cars

Meeting Jost Capito, the man behind Volkswagen’s R division

While some senior car company executives spend their entire career with one manufacturer, the ones who bounce around the industry tend to end up with the more interesting tales.  None has packed more into their professional life than Jost Capito, today head of Volkswagen’s R GmbH performance division but with a CV that seems to be pretty much all highlights. Now a youthful 60, the German says he hopes to end his career at Volkswagen but admits that his non-linear life has been fun.  The biggest adventures came early on. As a teenager Capito had been a successful endurance bike racer and – as a young graduate engineer at BMW – he and his father entered the Paris-Dakar rally in a Unimog, winning the truck class in 1985. “I learned a huge amount about teamwork,” he says, “but I had taken my whole year’s vacation. I came back and was completely destroyed, with no holiday for the rest of the year.”  He had joined BMW from university driven by his passion to work at M division under legendary engine designer Paul Rosche. His first project was the four-cylinder engine for the E30 M3 – Capito did the intake and exhaust manifolds. He started to climb the corporate ladder but was wary of specialising too soon – Rosche’s nickname in German translates as ‘Camshaft Paul’ – so in 1989 he took up an offer to move to Porsche’s race department. Capito was responsible for the one-make cars and soon found buyers lobbying for road-going versions. “There was so much demand that we pushed the board until they gave us approval,” he remembers. “It was the 964 RS, the first road car from the Race division. I promised to sell 1400 cars and we ended up making 5000.”  Next came a lateral move to Sauber, specifically Sauber Petronas Engineering, which was charged with moving Proton beyond its early technical alliance with Mitsubishi. Capito led development of an all-new 2.0-litre engine, and although this didn’t make production his skills at project management were noticed and he was made COO of the Sauber F1 team in 1998. He was the man who signed up a young Finn called Kimi Räikkönen.  But then Ford came knocking with an offer Capito couldn’t refuse. “Martin Leach approached me, they wanted to get ST and RS launched properly, to bring them back,” he recalls.  The problem was that the first Focus RS had already been mostly developed by the time Capito joined in 2001, and it was both over-budget and behind schedule. Sales weren’t good enough to warrant the cost of developing a version of the Mk2, so Capito found a way of short cutting Ford’s cautious decision making. “We did the five-cylinder Focus ST and it was successful,” he says. “But I knew if I said I wanted to do an RS it would be no. So I said I wanted to do an ST Plus, to build on what was already successful. Then when the car was developed we said ‘ST Plus isn’t much of a name – we should call it the RS!’”  His role expanded to become global. The Ford F150 Raptor and Mustang Shelby GT500 were developed on his watch and he became increasingly involved with motorsport, especially the WRC. “In 2006 and 2007 we won the manufacturers’ championship, but that was with an external team,” he says, recalling M-Sport’s success. “The next step was obviously to do it with a works team, and that’s when Volkswagen approached me.”  Capito led the WRC team throughout a period of dominance, taking four drivers’ and constructors’ championships in a row. “It was like a dream,” he admits. “I think the most rewarding time of my career, of all of it.”  It also led onto another radical change in direction, with Capito recruited by McLaren to head the Formula 1 team in 2016. It should have been the pinnacle of his career, but he ended up leaving just three months later.  “I had agreed what I was going to do with Ron (Dennis),” Capito says. “But then he was gone and it didn’t make any sense. People thought I was really close to Ron. I wasn’t, I just liked working with him and we had a good plan to get the team back to success. The other guys had a completely different opinion, and I said ‘I can only take responsibility if I can be in charge’.”  Capito insists he has no hard feelings, not least as his departure brought him straight back to Volkswagen. “(CEO Herbert) Diess had said I could always come back – as soon as he heard I was leaving he asked if I wanted to help set R up.”  Capito is planning a significant increase in R-branded vehicles, confirming that we can expect many of VW’s bigger models to spawn performance derivatives. He’s also happy to be involved in the push to electrification. “To be part of that transformation and see how it works from the performance side is really exciting,” he says.  Capito’s enthusiasm is unforced and – from conversations with underlings and colleagues – he seems to be almost universally well regarded. He admits he regards himself as being lucky in terms of his career. “I had really great bosses, pretty much all of them. I
Origin: Meeting Jost Capito, the man behind Volkswagen’s R division