Ford is reportedly building a Bronco-based pickup truck

The new Ford Bronco hasnt even been seen in the flesh yet, and were already hearing rumours about possible offshoot versions, in particular a possible pickup variant to take on the new Jeep-truck.According to Automobile magazine, citing industry analyst AutoForecast Solutions, Ford will add an open bed to the not-yet-unveiled Bronco, with production of this pickup trim starting in July of 2024.Thats a full four years after the Bronco SUV is expected to debut.Now, like us, you make be confused, because the Bronco itself is built on the upcoming Ranger platform, which is already a pickup truck. Why a second truck take on the same platform? Possibly because boxy, retro-looking SUVs and trucks are in now, as evidenced by the coming-in-hot return of the Jeep Gladiator.If Ford is truly gunning for the Gladiator, that means the Bronco pickup will likely be a crew-cab, with a smaller bed in behind. Ford is allegedly also working on another, smaller version of the Bronco that could possibly be dubbed the Bronco Scout. If reports can be believed, that will be a small unibody truck based on the Ford Focus architecture. Its possible that vehicle will morph into another small pickup, maybe called the Courier.We have no doubt this truck will sell like hotcakes; the small pickup truck market is on fire right now, and Ford is understandably keen to throw its hats into as many rings as possible. The 2020 Ranger will have to fill the boots until 2024, when the appetite for small pickups will hopefully remain
Origin: Ford is reportedly building a Bronco-based pickup truck

GM claims acceleration victory over Ram in HD pickup wars

In the never-ending Detroit pickup truck wars, it was inevitable that competition between brands would eventually spill over into areas other than simple output numbers.Ram was the first to crest the 1000 lb.-ft. of torque figure, leaving the other two Detroit truck makers to needle them about other matters of supremacy. The latest? Acceleration times.At a presentation last week during media drives of the 2020 Chevrolet Silverado HD, company spox boasted of their trucks ability to take full advantage of torque, claiming their truck is capable of faster acceleration times than an equivalent Ram HD pickup.For the record, GM was showing stats for a Silverado 3500 DRW and a Ram 3500 DRW.According to data shown at the event, Chevys workhorse can whip from zero to 60 mph (96 km/h) in 7.4 seconds, a full two seconds faster than the Ram. When laden with an 18,000-lb trailer, the Chevy can allegedly turn the same trick in 19.9 seconds, a 2.6-tick advantage over the Ram.Executing a highway passing maneuver from 40 to 60 mph with this load in tow is said to take 11.8 seconds in the Chevy, 12.8 in the Ram.Naturally, it didnt take long for Ram to hit back. According to reports, FCA reps were eager to explain theyre more concerned about the ability to maintain speed on a grade rather than flat-out straight-line performance on a billiard-smooth surface.GMs diesel does have 45 horsepower on the Ram, which explains some of its extra urgency in a quick-start situation. Remember the racers creed: horsepower is how fast your car hits the wall, torque is how far you move the wall.In any event, both the Ram and Chevy are within a hairs breadth of each other in terms of maximum towing prowesstheyll pull 35,100 lbs and 35,500 lbs, respectively.Another poke-in-the-eye that GM tossed out to its competition during last weeks launch? They claim that every 3500 DRW diesel can haul at least 30,000 lbs while pointedly asserting the Other Guys cannot make that statement.The truck wars arent ending anytime soon,
Origin: GM claims acceleration victory over Ram in HD pickup wars

Honda just restored this—classic Chevrolet pickup?

American Honda 60th Anniversary Chevy Delivery TruckHonda Honda corporates latest restoration efforts are of a less-than-usual subject, this 1961 Chevrolet Apache long-bed used to deliver motorcycles to dealers in the mid-1960s.The restoration was completed for Hondas 60th anniversary of selling vehicles in America.Powering the truck is a 283-cubic-inch V8 coupled to a three-speed manual transmission, which is more than enough to carry around a couple of lightweight motorcycles.Speaking of which, the bikes in the bed are a 1965 Super Cub with a 49-cc motor; and a 1965 CB160 with a 161-cc two-cylinder motor.The truck isnt the exact vehicle that was used by Honda in the 60s, but it has been painstakingly recreated to look just like it. Honda worked hard to make the combination as close as it could to an archival photo it had of the truck, including the hand-painted livery with Honda Americas original home office address. Honda didnt start building its own cars until the mid-sixties, and even then they werent something that could haul a bunch of bikes around. At the time, Soichiro Honda was fully engrossed in racing, and the companys focus was on cutting-edge motorcycles, which is why its first car, the Honda S600, was built of mostly motorcycle parts.The truck and motorcycle combo will be making an appearance at this years SEMA show, as well as going on a nation-wide tour, before going back home to Torrance, California, where it will be displayed in front of a replica of Hondas 1959
Origin: Honda just restored this—classic Chevrolet pickup?

GM invests US$150 million to increase heavy-duty pickup production

General Motors is investing millions into expanding its pickup truck capacity, the second time in two months that it’s put major cash into its truck plants. It will invest US$150 million into Flint Assembly in Michigan to increase production of the all-new Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra heavy-duty pickup trucks, which started shipping to dealers earlier this week. The money will be used to enhance the conveyor system and tooling. The expansion will be completed in the first half of 2020. Last month, GM announced it’s expanding production capacity of its light-duty Silverado and Sierra trucks in Fort Wayne, Indiana, “in response to strong customer demand.” The automaker has invested more than US$1.6 billion into Flint since 2013, expanding its capacity by about 40,000 vehicles annually. Opened in 1947, Flint Assembly has three production shifts. It added 1,000 new jobs this year, and employs more than 5,000 workers. GM said the Flint and Fort Wayne investments are its most recent in its growing truck, SUV, and crossover business. It previously announced investments at three plants in Ohio, two in Michigan, and in Spring Hill, Tennessee. Its Canadian assembly plant in Oshawa, Ontario, which makes the final versions of the last-generation pickups currently sold alongside the all-new trucks, will close later this
Origin: GM invests US$150 million to increase heavy-duty pickup production

Pickup Comparison: 2019 Ford Ranger vs. GMC Canyon vs. Toyota Tacoma

Big trucks are exactly that, and many drivers don’t need something with as much bulk as a full-size pickup. So, we corralled the Big Three of the midsize trucks — the 2019 Ford Ranger, GMC Canyon, and Toyota Tacoma — to sort out which might best suit those who don’t need or want a full-sizer. We would have loved to include the new Jeep Gladiator, which is going to be a serious contender when it arrives, but we were just a little too early for its release. We’ll throw it into the mix another time. To be sure, all three of these midsize trucks are seriously capable, close enough to their bigger siblings that they’ll be enough truck for many, many buyers. Plus they’re easier to park, drive, and manoeuvre around town and off road. Each is able to tow in excess of 6,000 pounds, carry more than 1,100 pounds, and traverse the kind of rough ground few SUVs will dare to tread. That said, each truck has its own unique strengths and one stands taller than the rest. After a day of driving each truck over the same route through a muddy and rutted forest, and after many more kilometres on asphalt, this is what we found. Engines We had ourselves a pair of sixes, and one four. The Canyon’s 3.6-litre V6 made the most horsepower at 308, while the Tacoma’s 3.5L V6 churned out 278 horses. The Ranger uses a 2.3-litre turbocharged four-cylinder engine — Ford calls it EcoBoost — that had the lowest horsepower at 270, but the highest torque at 310 lb.-ft. We like power, but we’re fond of naturally aspirated engines versus turbochargers. Regular engines have fewer moving parts, and we like a simpler design if we’re keeping the truck for a while. The turbo, however, gave the Ranger the best published fuel economy at a combined 10.9 L/100 kilometres in city/highway driving (12.2 for the Canyon, and 12.9 for the Tacoma with off-road package). That’s always a bonus, but be aware that turbo engines can get thirsty if they’re worked hard, such as when towing. Torque, of course, is what provides the feeling of power, and the Ranger leads the way here. Touch the throttle and response is immediate, whereas the Tacoma felt like it needed a hard leather whip to get it to giddy up, with peak torque absent until the 3,500-4,000 rpm mark. The Canyon fell somewhere in the middle of these two. The Ranger also felt smoother and less busy because it didn’t have to work so hard to reach its maximum 310 lb.-ft. Transmission-wise, all were automatics: the Tacoma had six speeds, the Canyon eight, and the Ranger had ten. All of them got the job done, but with those extra gears, the Ford added an additional level of smooth shifting. All three trucks were 44, of course, but the Canyon offered an “automatic” four-wheel setting so it can be driven in all conditions, including on alternating dry/wet/snowy roads. The other two, with manually-activated transfer cases, could only be driven in 44 mode on loose surfaces to avoid binding up the drivetrain. It was no surprise the Tacoma, with its TRD Pro package, proved to be the most off-road-capable and included a drive mode dial to optimize performance in mud, sand, gravel, and other conditions. Both it and the Ranger’s FX4 Off-Road Package for $1,400, included a crawl control feature, which is basically very-low-speed cruise control when you’re off the beaten path. Ride and handling Without question, the Ranger returns the most comfortable ride. The adjustable heated seats are truly comfortable and supportive, and the suspension happily absorbs asphalt fractures, though it tended to be a little less controlled over the big bumps on our off-road route. Noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) in the Ranger have clearly benefited from the F-150, which has seen years of effort to quiet things down. The Canyon isn’t far behind, though, and delivers a smooth ride, if somewhat devoid of feedback. The Tacoma is easily the loudest (more so with TRD Pro exhaust). But the Tacoma also delivers the highest level of feel throughout the truck, which helps to elevate the overall drive experience and makes it feel more truckish than the others — something we like. What we don’t like is the Tacoma’s seating position, which is too low to the floor with no way to raise the seat, and which can result in cramped legs. That said, 2020 models get a power-adjustable seat. Practicality At 7,500 pounds of towing capacity, the Ranger topped the Canyon’s 7,000 pounds. The Tacoma only pulls 6,400 pounds, but Toyota has always marketed this as more of a “lifestyle” truck — ideal for dirt bikes, ATVs, snowmobiles, mountain bikes, and small boats. Inside, all three trucks have easy-to-use controls, with the Tacoma’s taking a slight edge for accessing functions with minimal distraction. The Tacoma and the Canyon bettered the Ranger for small-item storage in its front console. But on the exterior, nothing beats GM’s simple-and-brilliant in-bumper steps for getting into the bed. Quality, features, infotainment All three of
Origin: Pickup Comparison: 2019 Ford Ranger vs. GMC Canyon vs. Toyota Tacoma

Rivian unveils a Camping Special trim for its upcoming all-electric pickup

Electric vehicle start-up Rivian showed off a “camping special” trim available for its all-electric pickup truck late May—even though it’s yet to actually build its first production all-electric pickup truck. The California-based company showed the camper-equipped truck last weekend to visitors at the Overland Expo adventure travel show in Flagstaff, Arizona. The camping package includes a tent on top of the bed, roof racks for accessories, and a slide-out kitchen that fits into a storage compartment, called the Gear Tunnel, under the front of the truck’s bed. The kitchen included a two-burner induction cooktop, which runs off the truck’s battery. We’ve cooked up a mobile kitchen prototype that showcases just one of the many ways to utilize the extra storage space in the #R1T. It features 2 induction burners, a sink, 5 gallons of water storage and keeps all your cookware and utensils organized while youre out in the wild. pic.twitter.com/qsVXZUvCw8 Rivian (@Rivian) May 17, 2019 Founded in 2009 by R.J. Scaringe, the company unveiled its R1T electric pickup and R1S sport-utility vehicle at last year’s Los Angeles Auto Show. It says production models will go on sale in 2020, and claims specifications of around 800 horsepower, a battery range of about 750 kilometres, zero-to-96 km/h in less than three seconds, and towing capacity for the pickup of more than 11,000 lbs. The vehicles will also be capable of semi-autonomous highway driving. Prices haven’t been officially released, but the first higher-performance vehicles are expected to be around US$90,000, with less-potent models added later and starting at around US$50,000. They’ll be built in Normal, Illinois, in a former Mitsubishi plant the company bought from the Japanese automaker last
Origin: Rivian unveils a Camping Special trim for its upcoming all-electric pickup

YouTuber fits vintage Dodge pickup with 212-cc lawn mower engine

Carson Duba, a.k.a. EverythingWithWheels on YouTube, has a thing for Predator engines. It says so right on his YouTube About page: Let’s fix something or put a Predator in it! Words to live by, truly. For Duba, the most recent manifestation of this mantra is a vintage Dodge Ram that runs on a US$120 212-cc Predator motor, a power plant designed for vacuums, mowers and pressure washers. Designed for, perhaps, but not relegated to, because the motor moves this little truck just fine, forward and backward, at speeds up to 32 km/h. When Duba’s friend who’d had it kicking around the yard gave it to him, the early ’80s Dodge Ram 50 had a four-cylinder engine. That was scooped out clean to make room for Duba’s more-modest solution. The 6.5-horsepower motor sits on a custom-made platform with its throttle connected to the vehicle’s pedal. It took some negotiation to get the clutch, 60-tooth sprocket and chain to ship power to the five-speed manual transmission and lug the heavy truck around. But, well, take a look at the results! Possibly the best feature? The fact that it looks and drives like a truck, but still starts like a lawnmower, with a pull cord that’s fed through the body and pulled from under the front driver’s side wheel.
Origin: YouTuber fits vintage Dodge pickup with 212-cc lawn mower engine

Motor Mouth: Which of these EV pickup concepts have the best chance of reaching production?

Its only a matter of time before pickup trucks become electrified.Brendan McAleer / Handout / Driving / GMC It was inevitable. Inescapable, really. Money, as they say, follows markets and there’s simply no market bigger right now than the gargantuan pickups that have, quite literally, taken over North America. Marry that predilection with the headlines surrounding pretty much anything electric and it’s amazing we’re not already awash in plug-in pickups. Actually, if Tesla’s biannual financial funk gets any deeper, Elon Musk may start taking deposits soon. Cynicism regarding Musk’s business practices aside, Tesla’s success has emboldened all manner of startups — Rivian, Atlis, and others — to build their own electric colossus, each vying to stuff more lithium-ions into their truck beds than the next. Even General Motors and Ford are leaping — OK, taking baby steps — into the segment themselves, worried the proverbial rock-and-hard-place that is consumer demand for ever more trucks versus increasingly stringent emissions standards may eventually limit how many profit-producing pickups they’ll be allowed to sell. So Motor Mouth decided to evaluate the major players in this burgeoning market; one eye trying to determine which ones will actually get produced, the other gauging their chances of success. And to measure each player’s chances, we have introduced a new rating system — the Motor Mouth Vapourware Index. Using our new VI index is easy: Our best score of zero represents an absolute certainty of success — a “dead cert,” if you will — while the maximum 10 denotes approximately the same probability of anyone actually driving, say, a Faraday Future vehicle. Tesla pickup — as inevitable as an inappropriate Elon Musk tweet A fan rendering of Tesla’s upcoming pickup truck Stephen William Mason There is little doubt Tesla will produce a pick-me-up sometime in the future. And, whatever its guise, it will likely be a grand success, loyal Teslarati likely to park one right beside the Range Rover that’s never seen a dirt road or the Ferrari that’s never been to a racetrack. Exactly what will power these “cyberpunk Blade Runners” — quite literally Musk’s description for his new pickup — remains speculation, but he has promised a range of 500 miles (800 kilometres), meaning — if the Model X is any indication — it eats up about 40 kWh every 160 kilometres of driving. We’re looking at about 200 kWh of lithium ion. That’s US$40,000 worth of battery, which means there will be precious little change from CDN$100,000. Nonetheless, look for them to be a plague at high-end craft meets. Motor Mouth VI: 0 Rivian R1T — the new darling of the plug-in set 2019 Rivian R1T Electric Truck Handout / Rivian Rivian is the one manufacturer threatening Tesla’s stranglehold on EV hype, its marketing just the right combination of exaggeration and outright hyperbole. Beyond the standard puffery — the R1T’s 180 kWh battery has inspired truly headline-grabbing embellishments — there’s some pretty nifty design, like the innovative ski pass-thru that reveals inventiveness beyond mere emissions reduction. Ford has invested heavily in Rivian, and R1T test mules were actually disguised as F-150s to prevent detection, which begs the question: Will Rivian produce electrified pickups under its own badge, or will the guppy get swallowed by the whale? Whatever the case, the R1T (or something using its technology) will hit streets. Motor Mouth VI: 4 as a standalone marque, 1 as a rebadged Ford Workhorse W-15 — perhaps a little too practical for its own good The Workhorse electric truck concept. Handout / Workhorse Workhorse is in negotiations to buy the shuttered Lordstown plant from General Motors, so one has to assume it intends to produce something that resembles its much-ballyhooed W-15. That said, the deal — contrary to Donald Trump’s recent tweet — is not final, rendering the promise of 2019 deliveries somewhat fanciful. Nonetheless, Workhorse stands out in this crowd with its decision to use a more practical plug-in hybrid powertrain. Oh, its 60-kWh battery does promise 80 miles (128 kilometres) of electric-only driving, but its BMW-supplied range extender allows 310 miles (500 kilometres) more gasoline-fueled range. The W-15 is set to start at about US$50,000 and will have the capacity to power your house in an emergency. Indeed, the only knock on the Workhorse may be that it is both practical and affordable, both qualities the EV crowd seems to find unappealing. Motor Mouth VI: Eventually 1, but a 7 going by the initial promise of this year Bollinger B2 — modest goals mean this “electrified Hummer” has an off chance to make it to market The Bollinger B2 electric truck Handout / Bollinger Unlike the rest of the plug-in pickups discussed here, the Bollinger is not looking to impress nouveau-riche dilettantes. It boasts but 200 miles (320 kilometres) of range despite carrying no less than a 120-kWh of Li-ion in its
Origin: Motor Mouth: Which of these EV pickup concepts have the best chance of reaching production?

GM says it’s definitely building an electric pickup

2019 GMC Sierra AT4Costa Mouzouris After recently backing away from partnership talks with EV truck-maker Rivian only to have Ford jump in, and following a trail of hints at an electrified SUV or pickup, GM has announced it’ll be developing an electric pickup truck of its own. CEO Mary Barra confirmed the company’s plans to enter a product into the electric pickup segment during an investor call this week. It’s basically a no-brainer for GM as much of the competition already announced their plans to produce electric pickups. This includes Ford, which just last week made public its plans to drop $500 million into Rivian in addition to previous announcements to develop a hybrid and EV F-150, and Tesla, which is also getting into the pickup game. The GM truck—likely a Sierra or Silverado as both of the current generations were built to work with other power sources, namely electricity—will line up beside GM’s other current and future E-vehicles, including the upcoming nameless electric Caddy SUV and the Chevrolet Bolt. That’s about all we’ve got for details at the moment: It’ll be a pickup, it’ll be a GM and it’ll be electric. But it probably won’t be here anytime soon.
Origin: GM says it’s definitely building an electric pickup

Is Volkswagen finally ready to challenge Tacoma and Ranger in the small pickup market?

What is it? Not a full-size truck and not an SUV either, the Volkswagen Tarok Concept is VW dipping its toe in the small-truck waters to see if should dive in and swim. Clearly envious of the stampede of sales going to full-size trucks amid an equally coveted resurgence of midsize trucks, VW is presenting the Tarok at the NY Auto Show as way to gauge interest for the vehicle in North America, even though VW already intends to build the truck for South America. Why does it matter? With a reconfigurable cargo bed capable of carrying six-foot objects, thanks to a folding waterproof panel behind the rear seat, the Tarok boasts a cargo-carrying capacity of 1,030 kg (2,270 pounds) — more than the Toyota Tacoma, Ford Ranger or Jeep Gladiator — so perhaps take that with a grain of salt, given that a solid rear axle is unlikely and the engine is the same as that in a Golf, a 147-hp turbocharged 1.4-liter four cylinder. A digital instrument cluster, 9.2-inch infotainment touchscreen, and a removable Bluetooth speaker in the centre console also add character, as does the concept’s large glass roof. When is it coming? That’s entirely up to the public’s reaction. VW previously showed a small pickup in NY, the Atlas Tanoak, a pickup with considerable appeal and strong interest, yet the Tanoak hasn’t moved much down the production line as far as we know. Should you buy it? If a full-size truck is too big, and the midsize offerings from Chevrolet, Toyota and Jeep are just too truckish, the Tarok would no longer leave some buyers between a rock and a hard
Origin: Is Volkswagen finally ready to challenge Tacoma and Ranger in the small pickup market?