Next-gen safety to focus on rear seat safety

The 2019 Jeep Wrangler undergoing Euro NCAP crash testingHandout / Euro NCAP In recent years, auto manufacturers have been steadily ratcheting up their safety game for vehicle occupants, spurred on by ever-tougher crash tests cooked up by the NHTSA and IIHS. In particular, the new small- and medium-overlap tests put a big push on redesigning some vehicle components so front seat occupants are less likely to be injured in such a crash. But what about those who are sitting in the back seat? According to a recent story in the New York Times, that rear seat area might not be the safest spot in a car anymore. This is contrary to what most of us have been taught for years, that the back seat is definitely the safest place for certain passengers (read: children) in a crash. This likely stems from the days when dashboards were made of metal and the only thing between you and that enormous steering wheel was your face. Advancements for front seat passengers may have started to tip the balance. Those up front generally benefit from the likes of seat belt pre-tensioners and a raft of airbags, not all of which show up in rear passenger compartments of cars and SUVs. The Times reports safety professionals now have new recommendations about what to buy and where to sit, highlighting vehicles whose rear seats have similar safety gear as the ones up front. If seatbelts with pre-tensioning and load-limiting technology aren’t available in the back seat, the NHTSA recommends people aged 55 and older should sit up front. No more relegating grandpa to the back seat, so be prepared to hear more stories about the Pony Express in the name of safety. To be clear, the seatbelts in question meet federal safety standards. Perhaps it’s time for the standards to evolve. Help is on the way for new-car buyers who like to do their research. Within the next three years, the IIHS hopes to have developed a back-seat crash test, allowing buyers to compare new models on this measure. Stay safe out there,
Origin: Next-gen safety to focus on rear seat safety

Japan wants to limit seniors to driving cars with high-tech safety features

Statistics support driving tests for seniors over a certain age.Stock image Following a rise in fatal traffic accidents involving senior citizens in Japan, authorities are considering a change to licensing legislation that would require drivers over a certain age to only pilot safety-enhanced vehicles with features like automatic brakes. The changes, being developed by the National Police Agency in collaboration with various national ministries, will be proposed to Japan’s Cabinet along with the government’s growth strategy, sources recently told The Japan Times. According to Japan’s National Police Agency, the incidence of fatal accidents caused by drivers over the age of 75 in Japan has almost doubled in the last ten years. In 2008, fatal accidents caused by that age group accounted for 8.7 per cent of the total number in the country; in 2018, with 460 fatalities caused by drivers over 75, that figure was tallied at 14.8 per cent. The Agency commissioned three panels of experts to come up with some potential solutions to the growing issue. The new license would limit certain drivers to certain areas at certain times in certain vehicles, likely ones that include automatic braking and fail-safes for when the wrong pedal is pressed. This April, an 88-year-old driver and former government official struck and killed a mother and her daughter, and injured six others, in Tokyo. And even more recently in the city of Fukuoka, an 81-year-old driver collided with five other vehicles in an intersection, killing himself and his wife and injuring nine others. In both cases, it is believed the driver mistook the gas pedal for the brake pedal.
Origin: Japan wants to limit seniors to driving cars with high-tech safety features

Volvo crash-tests bike helmets for cyclist safety

Volvo Cars and POC develop world-first car-bike helmet crash test Volvo is developing a new, world-first crash test that pits bicycle helmets against cars to help protect cyclists. The automaker has teamed up with POC, a Swedish sports and safety company, to create the tests. They are being carried out at Volvo Cars’ research facilities in Gothenburg, Sweden, and are part of a wider research project aimed at understanding the types of long-term injuries that cyclists can sustain. For the test, POC bicycle helmets are put onto crash dummy heads that are mounted on a testing rig. The test vehicle doesn’t move; the dummy heads are launched toward different area of the hood, at different speeds and angles. Current bike helmet test procedures only involve dropping a helmet onto a flat or angled surface from different heights, and do not include vehicle-bicycle collisions. Volvo said the project with POC “aims to further refine and advance such testing.” In 2013, Volvo was the first auto manufacturer to add cyclist detection to its emergency forward braking system, following the launch of pedestrian detection with full braking in
Origin: Volvo crash-tests bike helmets for cyclist safety

Mercedes unveils GLE-based experimental safety vehicle

Mercedes-Benz unveiled the latest in a long line of experimental vehicles in an ongoing project into advanced safety technology. Based on a yet-to-be launched petrol-electric GLE, the ‘ESF 2019’ research project acts as a rolling showcase for new and improved safety functions that Mercedes expects to incorporate on its future models. Among the project’s innovations are those that the German car maker calls “near series” as well as developments that “look well into the future”. The ESF 2019’s developments include a new holistic driver environment that features a retractable steering wheel and pedal box as well as ideas for new airbag installations that Rodolfo Schöneburg, the head of Mercedes vehicle safety, said “take into account the greater interior flexibility offered by autonomous vehicles”. He said: “The great advantage of automating driving functions is that, in the future, fewer accidents will be caused by driver error. However, fully automated and driverless vehicles also come up against physical limits and there will undoubtedly be mixed traffic consisting of automated and non-automated vehicles for many years.” The heavily modified GLE also uses a new interior lighting function incorporated into the driver’s sun visor. It has been developed in response to recent studies that reveal a vitalising light source similar to that of mood lamps can significantly improve driver alertness on long journeys. As part of an update to its existing Pre-Safe belt tensioners, Mercedes has also equipped the ESF 2019 with Pre-Safe Curve, which warns the driver if the entry speed to corners is too high by lightly tightening the seatbelt. A new Pre-Safe Child function preventatively tensions the seatbelt and inflates impact protection elements around the child seat before an impact, reducing the loads acting on the child. This new function is also able to monitor the seat installation and the child’s vital signs. On its outside, the new safety research vehicle features digital surfaces incorporated into the grille, rear window and roof. Developed in a programme that aims to build people’s trust in automated vehicles, these digital surfaces communicate directions and other vital information as well as warn other road users and pedestrians of impending danger, even when parked. Another new development heavily tipped to appear on next year’s all-new S-Class is Mercedes’ Digital Light – a high-definition light source with a resolution of more than two million pixels that is claimed to be dazzle-free. A further future safety function being tested by Mercedes is a small robot that doubles as a warning triangle to secure accident sites or breakdowns. It deploys from the rear and positions itself at the side of the road. An additional warning triangle folds out of the roof. A potentially life-saving innovation is the new Pre-Safe Impulse Rear. It monitors when vehicles are approaching from the rear in a tailback and can autonomously move the ESF 2019 forwards if an impending impact is detected, provided there is the space to do so. The project draws on more than 50 years of accident research. Previous experimental vehicles have previewed functions in current Mercedes models, including the rear seatbelt airbag and active high beam assistant initially incorporated on the ESF
Origin: Mercedes unveils GLE-based experimental safety vehicle

Autopilot was on when Tesla hit semi trailer in fatal crash: safety board

A Tesla Model 3 involved in a March 1 fatal crash in Florida was being driven by the vehicle’s semi-autonomous Autopilot system and the driver’s hands weren’t on the steering wheel, according to the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board. The driver was killed when the car slammed into the side of a semi-truck that was crossing a highway in Delray Beach, the NTSB said in a preliminary report released Thursday. The driver apparently wasn’t steering in the eight seconds before the collision, according to NTSB. “Preliminary vehicle data show that the Tesla was traveling about 68 mph (109 km/h) when it struck the semitrailer,” the report said. “Neither the preliminary data nor the videos indicate that the driver or the ADAS executed evasive maneuvers.” ADAS refers to Tesla’s advanced driver assistance system. The NTSB used video from a nearby surveillance camera showing the collision and the video devices that Teslas use to help them steer and perform other functions. “We are deeply saddened by this accident and our thoughts are with everyone affected by this tragedy,” Tesla said in an emailed statement. The company informed NTSB and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration about the Autopilot activation after reviewing the car’s computerized data log, the company said. The crash is the latest Tesla accident under investigation by the NTSB and is strikingly similar to 2016 case in which a Model S hit the side of a truck without braking. In that fatal collision, the NTSB found that the design of Tesla Autopilot system was partially responsible for the crash and issued two recommendations to the company and other manufacturers to improve the safety of such partially autonomous driving tools. Among the NTSB’s findings was that the car’s sensors weren’t designed to identify the side of the truck and, therefore, didn’t slow the car. The NTSB preliminary report on the March 1 collision doesn’t spell out what the car’s sensors detected as the vehicle approached the truck. The safety board is also looking at another fatal crash involving Autopilot in 2018 in California. In that case, a Model X struck a concrete highway barrier, killing the driver. NTSB investigators are also probing how the electric Tesla’s batteries behave after accidents following several
Origin: Autopilot was on when Tesla hit semi trailer in fatal crash: safety board

Watch a Chinese safety car take out the leaders of a race

An accident involving a safety car on the track of a recent Chinese Touring Car Championship event serves as a great example of why you should always, always shoulder-check.   Take notes on how this ‘safety car’ merges out in front of a pack of speeding race cars, and then, please, please always do the opposite. Video footage of the race shows the competitors coming down the track at speed when the safety car, a white Nio SUV, makes a wide and seemingly deliberate turn out in front of the speeding cars. The two lead drivers, teammates and brothers David and Juan Carlos Zhu, either don’t see the new obstacle in front or don’t have enough time to react and are forced to swerve to avoid the un-safety car. The movement causes the two BAIC Senova D50s to clip, with the rear vehicle then contacting the boards hard. The friendly oops, sorry, didn’t see ya there wave of the safety car’s driver was probably poor consolation for the racers who were forced out of the competition.  Nothin’ safe about
Origin: Watch a Chinese safety car take out the leaders of a race