Brexit and diesel fears stall car sales, says new research

As news of yet another monthly fall in new car sales emerged last week, there is strong new evidence that substantial numbers of car buyers are delaying purchases as a direct result of Brexit and confusion over powertrain choices. Exclusive data has been collected for Autocar by market research firm Simpson Carpenter from a sample of more than 1000 British car owners. It shows that among those whose car is more than two years old, almost half said they had originally planned to replace their car before now. Younger people and those buying or leasing new cars are most likely to be delaying their purchase. An underlying level of delay is to be expected, as changes in personal circumstances often get in the way of new car buying decisions. But one in four of those surveyed attributed the delay to the effects (potential or already felt) of Brexit, and 39% cited general economic concerns as a reason. A mix of uncertainty about the future of diesel and confusion over which powertrain to buy are the reasons mentioned by 27% of those sampled. Both Brexit and powertrain concerns have hit the new car market harder than the used, according to the data, with both factors cited by a majority of those intending to get a new car the next time they do upgrade. The premium car category is most badly hit: around a third who mentioned the two factors intend to buy more expensive cars. The hiatus seems likely to continue until the Brexit uncertainty is resolved. Almost a third claim they will put off their purchase until the effects become clear, with those aged 25-44 and those intending to buy in the next two years most likely to delay their decision. Conversely, two-thirds claim their next car purchase won’t be affected. Brexit appears to be affecting people’s choice of brand, too. One in five say they are more or less likely to buy certain marques as a result of Brexit, with German brands such as BMW, Volkswagen and Audi and French brands such as Renault, Peugeot and Citroën all most likely to be dropped from consideration. More people are likely to buy Fords and Toyotas, although Nissan loses slightly more than it gains – possibly as a result of the decision not to build the X-Trail in Sunderland. Tom Simpson, managing director of Simpson Carpenter, said: “New car sales are clearly being damaged by a political failure to provide clarity – firstly over the future of diesel and then the seemingly neverending Brexit negotiations. “The new car market is unlikely to recover until these uncertainties are resolved. And in these circumstances, it’s difficult to criticise car manufacturers if they delay decisions to invest in the UK.”
Origin: Brexit and diesel fears stall car sales, says new research

Mercedes-Benz says it wants to be carbon-neutral by 2039

The 2020 Mercedes-Benz EQC.Andrew McCredie Mercedes-Benz mid-May announced its intentions to make its entire fleet carbon-neutral in the next 20 years. The plan, dubbed Ambition2039, represents the automaker’s latest environmental responsibility goals, and sets a target date of meeting them by the year 2039, undercutting Volkswagen’s similar milestone date of 2050. That’s just 20 years away, and in just 10 years M-B hopes that PHEVs and EVs will account for at least half of all its car sales. “Let’s be clear what this means for us: a fundamental transformation of our company within less than three product cycles,” said future Chairman of the Board of Management of Daimler AG, Ola Källenius. “That’s not much time when you consider that fossil fuels have dominated our business since the invention of the car by Karl Benz and Gottlieb Daimler some 130 years ago. But as a company founded by engineers, we believe technology can also help to engineer a better future.” Other milestones set by Daimler include the use of more clean energy in the manufacturing process. The date for carbon-neutral European plants has been set for 2022. The latest product borne of this new era, the EQC electric crossover, left the factory earlier this month and will arrive in Canada sometime next year, giving Mercedes something to hook its public sustainability pledge on.   The brand’s ambitious goals to help the climate also echo a similar movement in the U.S. where the so-called Green New Deal proposes lofty goals and drastic changes in the name of the environment.
Origin: Mercedes-Benz says it wants to be carbon-neutral by 2039

Alberta premier Jason Kenney says provincial carbon tax will die May 30

Ontario Premier Doug Ford, left, and United Conservative Leader Jason Kenney greet supporters on stage an anti-carbon tax rally in Calgary, Friday, Oct. 5, 2018.Jeff McIntosh / The Canadian Press Premier Jason Kenney says Alberta’s carbon tax has about two weeks to live. Kenney says the Carbon Tax Repeal Act is to be introduced during next week’s legislature sitting and will have a proviso to end the tax by the end of the month. By May 30th there will no longer be an Alberta carbon tax, Kenney said Monday at a news conference outlining some of the legislation coming from his new United Conservative government. An end to the tax brought in by the former NDP government will put an estimated $1.4 billion a year back in the pockets of taxpayers, he said. The levy is charged on home heating using fossil fuels and on gasoline at the pumps. Ending the tax would open the door to the federal government imposing its tax, as it has done with four other provinces that wouldn’t bring in their own carbon pricing: Ontario, New Brunswick, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who was in Edmonton last Friday, wouldn’t say if his government would immediately charge the federal tax if Alberta ditched its own, but stressed that no province will be exempt. Opposition Leader Rachel Notley said the repeal sets the stage for a made-in-Ottawa, a made-by-Justin-Trudeau carbon plan to be imposed on Albertans. I don’t think it’s wise, the NDP leader said. And we will certainly make the case vigorously that it’s not wise. Getting rid of the carbon tax was a central policy pillar in Kenney’s successful campaign last month to win the election. He defeated Notley’s party, achieving a strong majority. On the campaign trail, Kenney promised to file an immediate court challenge on the constitutionality of the federal carbon tax if he won the election. He promised to file the court papers by April 30; however, his cabinet was not sworn in until that day. In the two weeks since, no challenge has been filed. Kenney said Monday the lawsuit has been delayed and may not be filed at all. He said his government wants to review court decisions in Saskatchewan and Ontario before it decides if it will challenge the federal tax in court. The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal recently ruled in a split decision that the federal tax imposed on provinces without a carbon price of their own is constitutional. The Ontario government is waiting for a decision on its court challenge.
Origin: Alberta premier Jason Kenney says provincial carbon tax will die May 30

Saskatchewan court says the carbon tax is constitutional

Car exhaust contains lethal carbon monoxide, so its important to make sure exhaust systems are working properly.Sue Reeve A Saskatchewan court has ruled that the federal government has the power to fight climate change on a national level, despite objections from the province. The decision allows the government to set a minimum national price on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and hit specific provinces with a carbon tax if they do not enact their own measures. The province filed the motion with the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in February, arguing that the carbon tax intruded on provincial jurisdiction, and was unconstitutional because it was not applied equally to all jurisdictions. Premier Scott Moe said that “climate change itself was not on trial,” but the province’s lawyers argued that a national tax would give the federal government power over Saskatchewan’s natural resources and its industrial regulations. In a 3-2 decision released today, the court sided with Parliament and said the carbon tax is constitutional, and is actually a regulatory charge on emissions, rather than a tax. Lawyers for the federal government had argued that a national carbon tax was required because the provinces can’t respond to GHG on their own. The carbon tax isn’t applied to all provinces, just to those that have not enacted their own carbon-pricing schemes that meet the national standards – which are Ontario, Manitoba, New Brunswick, and Alberta. Ontario has already launched a similar court case and is awaiting a ruling, while the premiers of the other three provinces have said they will launch legal actions of their own. The dissenting judges on Saskatchewan’s court said that the tax should be struck down, and that “federalism in Canada means that all governments of Canada must bring all law-making power to bear on the issue of climate change, but in a way that respects the division of power.” It’s expected that the Saskatchewan case, along with those of other provinces, will eventually end up at the Supreme Court of Canada, where all would likely be assembled into one challenge. The federal tax took effect on April 1, 2019 and is currently $20 per tonne of CO2, with an increase of $10 each year until 2022. Saskatchewan said the tax has or will raise the price of gasoline, heating oil and electricity, while the federal government said the majority of families will receive more in rebates than they pay for the carbon
Origin: Saskatchewan court says the carbon tax is constitutional

GM says it’s definitely building an electric pickup

2019 GMC Sierra AT4Costa Mouzouris After recently backing away from partnership talks with EV truck-maker Rivian only to have Ford jump in, and following a trail of hints at an electrified SUV or pickup, GM has announced it’ll be developing an electric pickup truck of its own. CEO Mary Barra confirmed the company’s plans to enter a product into the electric pickup segment during an investor call this week. It’s basically a no-brainer for GM as much of the competition already announced their plans to produce electric pickups. This includes Ford, which just last week made public its plans to drop $500 million into Rivian in addition to previous announcements to develop a hybrid and EV F-150, and Tesla, which is also getting into the pickup game. The GM truck—likely a Sierra or Silverado as both of the current generations were built to work with other power sources, namely electricity—will line up beside GM’s other current and future E-vehicles, including the upcoming nameless electric Caddy SUV and the Chevrolet Bolt. That’s about all we’ve got for details at the moment: It’ll be a pickup, it’ll be a GM and it’ll be electric. But it probably won’t be here anytime soon.
Origin: GM says it’s definitely building an electric pickup